AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › GTM data and infrastructure › Automation & iPaaS › Workato vs n8n
Workflow automation and iPaaS · October 2026 Edition

Workato vs n8n

Eight of fourteen models named Workato first on the direct prompt; zero named n8n. Both were named by all fourteen models and Workato carries 56 labels and n8n 48, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Workato

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

n8n

accepted challenger

Berlin, Spain, founded 2019. Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share28%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5648A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Workato reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Make was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Workato vs Make · Workato vs Celigo · Workato vs Boomi

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
WorkatoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsn8n
Direct802 against Workato
Paraphrase40
Comparative10
Budget-constrained051 against Workato
Scale-constrained40
Negative025 against Workato · 10 against n8n
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Workato and n8n were named in the same answer sixty-three times, of the 162 answers naming Workato and the 131 naming n8n. In those answers n8n took the first choice three times and Workato sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Workato and n8n stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Workato n8n first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workato on the left and n8n on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Workato and n8n stood in it.

Workato first, n8n not the choice

8 of 14 modelsn8n was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniWorkato alternatives: Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapier
Perplexity SonarWorkato alternatives: HubSpot Operations Hub, Make, Zapier
Grok 4.20Workato alternatives: Boomi, Celigo, Make, Tray.ai, Zapier
Mistral SmallWorkato alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Jitterbit Harmony, Microsoft Power Automate
DeepSeek V4 FlashCeligo, Workato alternatives: Make, Microsoft Power Automate
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkato alternatives: Jitterbit Harmony, Make, Microsoft Power Automate
GPT-6 LunaWorkato alternatives: Boomi, Make, Microsoft Power Automate
Muse Glimmer 30BCeligo integrator.io, Workato

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCeligo alternatives: Make, Tray.ai, Workato, Zapier
GLM 4.7 FlashXMake alternatives: Zapier, n8n
MiniMax M2.5Make, Zapier alternatives: Workato

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Llama 4 MaverickAdRoll ABM alternatives: Boomi, Celigo's integrator.io
Kimi K2Make alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
n8n leads by two points.
n8n2%#5 of 9
Workato0%#9 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Workato leads at mid-market.
Workato28%#1 of 11
n8n9%#4 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Workato leads by forty points.
Workato42%#1 of 14
n8n2%#8 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Workato

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Caution points are cost and complexity... Overkill for small teams; licensing and implementation costs can be high relative to simpler needs.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“often enterprise-first and can require significant IT involvement ... may be overkill for simple team automation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Powerful but expensive (~$2,500+/month...). Better for enterprises with dedicated integration budgets.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Workato is the best overall choice due to its scalability, depth, and B2B-focused integrations.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Workato is most often named as the overall "best for mid-market and enterprise IT teams running governed integrations"” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Workato is the safest and most flexible first choice if you want business teams to automate across apps” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about n8n

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Critical vulnerabilities: Multiple CVEs (CVE-2026-27577, CVE-2026-27493) with CVSS scores of 9.4-9.5” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tens of thousands of systems may be exposed to a critical vulnerability in n8n (CVE-2026-21858)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“This popular open-source workflow automation platform has faced multiple critical vulnerabilities... If you use n8n, ensure you're running the latest versions” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“For a company with a limited budget, n8n stands out as the best overall workflow automation and integration platform.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value (Free Option Available) ... n8n is unbeatable if you have technical resources to self-host” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“n8n self-hosted or Activepieces gives you truly zero vendor cost and unlimited runs” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.