GTM AI Index
Index GTM data and infrastructure Automation & iPaaS › Workato vs n8n
Workflow automation and iPaaS · September 2026 Edition

Workato vs n8n

Eight of twelve models named Workato first on the direct prompt; one named n8n. Both were named by all twelve models and Workato carries 53 labels and n8n 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Workato

endorsed leader

Named in one category this edition.

n8n

accepted challenger

Berlin, Spain, founded 2019. Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share38%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate13%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels5344A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Workato reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Make was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Workato vs Make · Make vs n8n

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
WorkatoFirst choices, of twelve modelsn8n
Direct811 against Workato
Paraphrase701 against n8n
Comparative11
Budget-constrained051 against Workato
Scale-constrained50
Negative105 against Workato · 7 against n8n
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Workato and n8n stood in it.

Workato first, n8n an alternative

8 of 12 modelsn8n was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Workato alternatives: Kissflow, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
GPT-5.4 miniWorkato alternatives: Boomi, MuleSoft
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, Tray.ai
Perplexity SonarWorkato alternatives: HubSpot Operations Hub, Make, n8n
Grok 4.1 FastWorkato alternatives: Boomi, Celigo, Make, Tray.ai
Mistral SmallWorkato alternatives: Jitterbit Harmony, Tray.ai
DeepSeek V4 FlashCeligo, Workato alternatives: Boomi, Jitterbit, Tray.ai
Llama 4 MaverickBoomi, SnapLogic, Workato

n8n first, Workato an alternative

1 of 12 modelsWorkato was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2Make, n8n alternatives: Workato, Zapier

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashMake alternatives: Tray.ai, Workato
GLM 4.7 FlashXMake alternatives: n8n

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
MiniMax M2.5Boomi, SnapLogic alternatives: Make, Microsoft Power Automate

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Workato2%#6 of 8
n8n2%#4 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Workato leads by twenty-seven points.
Workato38%#1 of 12
n8n12%#3 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Workato leads by twenty-seven points.
Workato29%#1 of 11
n8n2%#6 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Workato

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“### Workato Avoid or Use with Caution If: ... overkill and significantly more expensive than necessary” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid MuleSoft, Workato, and Tray.io (unless you are a major enterprise)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise like Workato ($10k+/yr)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Workato is an enterprise integration and automation platform with AI capabilities... best for growing teams (50+ employees) preparing for scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Workato is considered the best overall iPaaS for mid-market companies due to its balance of usability, depth, governance, and speed.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The gold standard for business-IT collaboration... though it sits on the more expensive side of the mid-market spectrum.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about n8n

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“n8n ⚠️ SECURITY CONCERNS ... Webhook URLs have been actively abused by threat actors since October 2025” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Excellent if you have genuine DevOps capacity... A trap if you're a non-technical team looking to save money.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious of Make (Integromat) and n8n ... they expect you to understand data structures like JSON” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“while n8n is the strategic choice if you have technical resources and want to scale without pricing surprises” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Privacy, Custom Code, or AI | n8n | Can be self-hosted securely, easily handles custom JavaScript/Python” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Make or n8n offer the best balance of features and cost, depending on your technical capabilities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.