Workflow automation and iPaaS for enterprise buyers
Asked as “workflow automation and integration platform”, and as “iPaaS”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
42%
Clear leader
42Workato12MuleSoft Anypoint Platform11Microsoft Power Automate35others
42% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+13Since September 2026: 29% → 43%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Workato held the lead, +13 points on 29%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Make44%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 50% → 44%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Workato28%Contested▼−13Since September 2026: 38% → 25%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseWorkato42%Clear leader▲+13Since September 2026: 29% → 43%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Make44%Clear leader▼−6Since September 2026: 50% → 44%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketWorkato28%Contested▼−13Since September 2026: 38% → 25%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseWorkato42%Clear leader▲+13Since September 2026: 29% → 43%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Workato42%10%71endorsed leader▲+13Since September 2026: 29% → 43%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 43%
Workato42%10%71endorsed leader▲+13Since September 2026: 29% → 43%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 43%02
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform12%14%51accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 18% → 13%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 13%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform12%14%51accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 18% → 13%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 13%03
Microsoft Power Automate11%26%46criticized challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 9%
Microsoft Power Automate11%26%46criticized challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 9%04
Boomi9%10%41accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%
Boomi9%10%41accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%05
Zapier4%57%47criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Zapier4%57%47criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%06
Tray.ai2%6%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Tray.ai2%6%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%07
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services2%0%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services2%0%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
n8n2%33%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
n8n2%33%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Make0%70%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Make0%70%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
UiPath0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
UiPath0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Automation Anywhere0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Automation Anywhere0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Celigo0%6%16accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
Celigo0%6%16accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%11SAP Integration Suite0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10
ServiceNow Flow Designer0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Flow Designer0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Workato vs BoomiWorkato vs ZapierWorkato vs Tray.aiWorkato vs Pabbly ConnectMake vs CeligoMake vs n8nMake vs BoomiMake vs ZapierMake vs Tray.aiMake vs Pabbly ConnectCeligo vs n8nCeligo vs BoomiCeligo vs ZapierCeligo vs Tray.aiCeligo vs Pabbly Connectn8n vs Boomin8n vs Zapiern8n vs Tray.ain8n vs Pabbly ConnectBoomi vs ZapierBoomi vs Tray.aiBoomi vs Pabbly ConnectZapier vs Tray.aiZapier vs Pabbly ConnectTray.ai vs Pabbly Connect
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910S11
121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Workato42%
Workato42%02MuleSoft Anypoint Platform12%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform12%03Microsoft Power Automate11%
Microsoft Power Automate11%04Boomi9%
Boomi9%05Zapier4%
Zapier4%06Tray.ai2%
Tray.ai2%07Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services2%
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services2%08n8n2%
n8n2%09Celigo0%
Celigo0%10ServiceNow Flow Designer0%
ServiceNow Flow Designer0%11SAP Integration Suite0%
12Automation Anywhere0%
Automation Anywhere0%13UiPath0%
UiPath0%14Make0%
Make0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zapier57%
27 of 47 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“Consumer-Grade & SMB-Focused Automation Tools **Examples:** Zapier, Make (formerly Integromat), IFTTT... they represent a significant risk when deployed across a large enterprise.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Make70%
19 of 27 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“SMB-First No-Code Tools (e.g., Zapier, Make) ... present significant risks when deployed across the entire organization.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Power Automate26%
12 of 46 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Zapier, Make, and basic Power Automate are not built for large-scale governance needs” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Workato10%
7 of 71 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Predictable Costs ... No public pricing; unpredictable overages” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1177 links across 366 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Zapier26 answers · 41 citations · 13 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ONES.com15 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Frends13 answers · 27 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 22 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Workato13 answers · 22 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Teamwork.com13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
19 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workflow automation and integration platform”, “workflow automation and integration platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workato workato.com | 42% | 148 | 14,800 | 405 | 38,042 | $20 | 120 |
| MuleSoft Anypoint Platform mulesoft.com | 12% | 69 | 720 | 4 | 73,982 | 99 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power Automate 11% | 11% | 114 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| Boomi boomi.com | 9% | 73 | 12,100 | 732 | 19,837 | $22,810 | 120 |
| Kissflow kissflow.com | 4% | 17 | 36,586 | 34 | |||
| Cleo Integration Cloud cleo.com | 4% | 2 | 170 | 1 | 63,575 | 41 | |
| Zapier zapier.com | 4% | 213 | 165,000 | 2,145 | 7,333,309 | $230 | 120 |
| Tray.ai tray.ai | 2% | 42 | 390 | 7 | 4,110 | $97 | 1 |
| Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services informatica.com | 2% | 17 | 50 | 2 | 73,321 | 120 | |
| Dell Boomi dell.com | 2% | 10 | 13,697,880 | $10,867 | 63 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (latenode.com). The first result for “best workflow automation and integration platform” is useparagon.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workflow automation and integration platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which iPaaS would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade workflow automation and integration platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workflow automation and integration platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a workflow automation and integration platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workflow automation and integration platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: IFTTT, Make, ZapierMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedWorkatoNoxus, Workatoagainst: Zapierno first choiceagainst: Make, Zapier
Four alternatives
Dell Boomi, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, Talend, WorkatoSix alternatives
Make, Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow Flow Designer, UiPath, Zapier, n8nOne alternative
Microsoft Power AutomateGPT-5.4 miniWorkatoBoomiChangedMicrosoft Power Automate, WorkatoBoomiagainst: Microsoft Power AutomateTray.ai, Workato, Zapiernothing named
Three alternatives
Boomi, Microsoft, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformOne alternative
MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformFive alternatives
Boomi, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, SAP Integration Suite, SnapLogicOne alternative
WorkatoGemini 3.5 FlashWorkatoMuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoChangedTray.ai, WorkatoWorkatoWorkatoagainst: Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platformagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, IFTTT, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Salesforce Flow, ServiceNow App Engine, UiPath, Zapier
Four alternatives
Boomi, Celigo, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformThree alternatives
Boomi, Microsoft Azure Integration Services, SAP Integration SuiteSeven alternatives
Appian, Boomi, Camunda, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, Microsoft Power Automate, Salesforce, ServiceNow Flow DesignerThree alternatives
Frends iPaaS, Microsoft Power Automate, n8nTwo alternatives
Tray.ai, ZapierPerplexity SonarWorkatoMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedagainst: WorkatoWorkatoagainst: Maken8nagainst: ZapierWorkatoagainst: Adobe Workfront, BMC Control-M, Broadcom Automic/AutoSys, Jira automation, Kissflow, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
Four alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow Flow Designer, Tray.ai, ZapierTwo alternatives
Boomi, Informatica Intelligent Cloud ServicesSix alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Camunda, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow Flow Designer, ZapierOne alternative
ServiceNow Flow DesignerFour alternatives
Jinba, Kissflow, Moxo, SpendfloGrok 4.1 FastWorkatoagainst: ZapierDell Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedWorkatoagainst: Microsoft Power Automate, ZapierMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Boomi, Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.ai, Workato, ZapierWorkatoagainst: IFTTT, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
Four alternatives
Boomi, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps / Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration CloudTwo alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, WorkatoSeven alternatives
Boomi, Celigo, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud, SAP Integration Suite, Tray.aiOne alternative
Frends iPaaSThree alternatives
Boomi, Celigo, ServiceNow Flow DesignerMistral SmallCleo Integration CloudInformatica Intelligent Cloud ServicesChangedMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformKissflowagainst: Make, Zapierno first choiceagainst: Zapieragainst: BMC Control-M, Broadcom Automic/AutoSys, Relay.app, Relevance AI
Three alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoTwo alternatives
Boomi, Jitterbit HarmonyFour alternatives
Dell Boomi, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, Jitterbit Harmony, WorkatoThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow IntegrationHub, WorkatoFive alternatives
Boomi, Celigo, Microsoft Power Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoDeepSeek V4 FlashWorkatoagainst: ZapierMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformFrends iPaaSagainst: Boomi, Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoWorkato, Zapieragainst: Celigo, Make, n8nagainst: Automate.io, BMC Control-M, Broadcom Automic/AutoSys, IFTTT, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Cloud Platform Integration, Zapier, n8n
Five alternatives
Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Paragon, Prismatic, SAP Integration SuiteTwo alternatives
Boomi, WorkatoSeven alternatives
Boomi, Celigo, Microsoft Power Automate, Nintex, ServiceNow Orchestration, SnapLogic, WorkatoOne alternative
Microsoft Power AutomateThree alternatives
Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.aiLlama 4 MaverickWorkatono first choiceChangedno first choiceWorkatoJinbaagainst: BMC Control-M, Broadcom Automic/AutoSys, Microsoft Power Automate, Workato
Three alternatives
Coworker AI, Workato, ZapierQwen 3.7 FlashWorkatoMuleSoft Anypoint PlatformChangedagainst: ZapierMuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Make, Zapierno first choiceagainst: Activepieces, Automation Anywhere, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Zapier, n8n
Three alternatives
Dell Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformTwo alternatives
Microsoft, WorkatoEight alternatives
Appian, Automation Anywhere, Dell Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, Nintex, Pega, ServiceNow Flow Designer, UiPathTwo alternatives
Workato, n8nSix alternatives
AWS AppFlow, Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.ai, WorkatoKimi K2Workatoagainst: ZapierWorkatoHeldMuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Workatoagainst: ZapierMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, UiPath, Workato, Zapierno first choiceagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Power Platform, Zapier
Two alternatives
Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformTwo alternatives
Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformSix alternatives
Boomi AtomSphere, Celigo, IBM App Connect, Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow Flow Designer, SnapLogicOne alternative
BoomiGLM 4.7 FlashXWorkatoBoomi iPaaSChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Boomi, Workatono first choiceagainst: Make, Zapier, n8n Cloudagainst: Zapier
Three alternatives
Dell Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, n8nThree alternatives
IBM iPaaS, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoTwo alternatives
Kissflow, iPaaS.comTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, WorkatoMiniMax M2.5Cleo Integration Cloud, WorkatoBoomiChangedno first choiceKissflowagainst: Microsoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
Three alternatives
Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformTwo alternatives
Jitterbit Harmony, WorkatoThree alternatives
ServiceNow Flow Designer, Workato, ZenphiGPT-6 LunaWorkatoBoomiChangedno first choiceagainst: ServiceNow Integration HubMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Workatono first choiceagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft RPA, Zapier, n8n
Three alternatives
Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformTwo alternatives
Azure Logic Apps, MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformOne alternative
MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformSix alternatives
Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.ai, Workato, ZapierMuse Glimmer 30BBoomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, WorkatoBoomi AtomSphere / Boomi Enterprise PlatformChangedDell Boomi AtomSphere, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Workatoagainst: IBM App ConnectMicrosoft Power Automate, Workatoagainst: Make, ZapierWorkatoagainst: Composio, Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapier, n8n cloud
Three alternatives
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, SnapLogicOne alternative
Microsoft Power AutomateThree alternatives
Frends iPaaS, Integrate.io, PeliqanFour alternatives
Boomi, Celigo, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.aiBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:45 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:40 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:11 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 15 | 56 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:01 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:41 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 13 | 57 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 6 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:32 | yes | 25 | 65 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 14:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:19 | yes | 10 | 70 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:25 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:41 | yes | 11 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:21 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:11 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:44 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:35 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 4 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:09 | yes | 27 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:21 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:07 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:36 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 24 | 72 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:02 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 14 | 70 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:41 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:21 | yes | 27 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:56 | yes | 21 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:34 | yes | 25 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 25 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 24 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:28 | yes | 25 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:40 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Frends read as Frends iPaaS
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services
Informatica (Intelligent Data Management Cloud) read as Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services
Informatica IICS read as Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) read as Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services
Jitterbit read as Jitterbit Harmony
Jitterbit (SAP) read as Jitterbit Harmony
MuleSoft read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Salesforce Anypoint Platform) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Salesforce) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (by Salesforce) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Oracle read as Oracle Integration Cloud
SAP read as SAP Integration Suite
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Flow Designer
ServiceNow (App Engine & Flow Designer) read as ServiceNow Flow Designer
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS AppFlow
Bonita
Boomi AtomSphere
Boomi AtomSphere / Boomi Enterprise Platform
Boomi Enterprise Platform
Boomi iPaaS
Composio
Coworker
Dell Boomi AtomSphere
Flokzu
Flowable
IBM iPaaS
IBM webMethods
IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration / IBM Integration SaaS
Jira automation
Microsoft
Microsoft (Azure Logic Apps + Power Automate)
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps / Power Automate
MuleSoft RPA
Nango
Noxus
ONEiO
Onspring
Qntrl
Rezolve.ai
Robocorp
SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI)
Salesforce (MuleSoft Anypoint Platform)
ServiceNow App Engine
ServiceNow Integration Hub
ServiceNow Orchestration
Stacksync
Suite (by Beta Systems)
The Bricks
WSO2
Zenphi
iPaaS.com
monday AI Workspace
n8n Cloud
n8n cloud
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.