Every category where a model named UiPath for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	57 of 76	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Workato at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UiPath yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UiPath across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose UiPath for legacy desktop/UI automation.” Perplexity Sonar · Automation & iPaaS · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“UiPath is not suitable for small teams or freelancers” Perplexity Sonar · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UiPath, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UiPath was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workato18 of 217Not in the top three

Zapier17 of 213Not in the top three

Microsoft Power Automate17 of 212Not in the top three

n8n17 of 211Not in the top three

Make16 of 211Not in the top three

Boomi10 of 211Not in the top three

Automation Anywhere10 of 210Not in the top three

MuleSoft6 of 211Not in the top three

ServiceNow6 of 210Not in the top three

Kissflow5 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UiPath. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 21 answers that named UiPath and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlassian.com5

guideflow.com4

reddit.com4

stacksync.com4

betasystems.com3

invensislearning.com3

munro.agency3

ones.com3

technologyadvice.com3

analyticsinsight.net2

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming UiPath came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlassian.com/agile/project-management/workflow-automation-software5

guideflow.com/blog/workflow-automation-platforms4

stacksync.com/blog/workflow-automation-tools-guide4

betasystems.com/resources/blog/enterprise-workflow-tools3

invensislearning.com/blog/best-workflow-automation-software3

munro.agency/insights/top-workflow-automation-and-integration-platforms3

ayautomate.com/blog/best-workflow-automation-platforms2

fiverr.com/resources/guides/business/top-six-workflow-automation-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

UiPath.

Website: uipath.com
Headquarters: New York City, United States
Founded: 2005
Employees: about 4,000
Ownership: Public, PATH on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UiPath's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UiPath, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at uipath.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.