Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 71 → 62 of 63
1 category · RankedMuleSoft Anypoint Platform
80Judge labels
7First choices
24Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Automation & iPaaS for enterprise buyers
Rank 67 of 67 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 48% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business67 of 68
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market67 of 67
0%23 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise2 of 101
12%51 labels
accepted challenger
In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow automation and iPaaS | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 67 of 67 | 48% | 23 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Automation & iPaaS · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 73 → 63 of 63
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 18% → 13%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 18% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 2 of 79, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automation & iPaaS | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 73 → 67 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MuleSoft Anypoint Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MuleSoft Anypoint Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels1
Paraphrase17 labels6
Comparative14 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained14 labelsNone
Negative14 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative80 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Governed enterprise integration: Workato, SnapLogic, Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint, Celigo” Muse Glimmer 30B · Automation & iPaaS · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose MuleSoft if you are a massive enterprise tasked with managing complex APIs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · comparative prompt · alternative
“MuleSoft: if you already have a strong API-led architecture” GPT-5.4 mini · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · alternative
“Limitations: Expensive and requires significant expertise.” Mistral Small · Automation & iPaaS · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why to Avoid: They are notoriously difficult to implement, expensive to license, and require certified administrators” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tier 3: Avoid for Most Mid-Market B2B - Enterprise-grade, expensive, requires full-time integration engineers.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Heavy Enterprise Middleware (MuleSoft, Boomi, TIBCO) unless you are a Fortune 500 company” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · hard negative
“overkill and overpriced for most mid-market B2B needs” Kimi K2 · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MuleSoft Anypoint Platform was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MuleSoft Anypoint Platform was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MuleSoft Anypoint Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 80 answers that named MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
zapier.com22
technologyadvice.com18
frends.com17
g2.com17
learn.microsoft.com14
munro.agency14
ones.com14
workato.com14
albato.com13
automationatlas.io13
156 of the 156 domain citations in answers naming MuleSoft Anypoint Platform came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mulesoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform takes 0% of first choices and Workato takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mulesoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform takes 0% of first choices and Workato takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workflow automation and integration platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best workflow automation and integration platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“mulesoft anypoint platform”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 73,982 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,471 · 760 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,563
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 67 of 67 in automation & ipaas
Segment leader
28%
Workato
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 80 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 69 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mulesoft.com
10,045
subdomains included
Content
59
counted in the table below
Documentation
9,978
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 29 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 5 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Blog | 2 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mulesoft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform; a claim can dispute any of them.
MuleSoft 12MuleSoft (Anypoint) 3MuleSoft (Salesforce) 3MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) 2MuleSoft Anypoint 1
Follow MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MuleSoft is the company behind MuleSoft Anypoint Platform.ShowHide
The company
MuleSoft is the company behind MuleSoft Anypoint Platform.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- mulesoft.com
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2006
- Ownership
- Part of Salesforce
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- You can deploy your Mule applications from Anypoint Studio to the Anypoint Platform cloud.
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial docs.mulesoft.com/studio/login-platform-from-studio
- Hosting
- Canada CloudJapan CloudEU CloudMuleSoft Government CloudPCE 3PCE 4US CloudIndia Cloud
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, customers
What MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: docs.mulesoft.com/studio/login-platform-from-studio, docs.mulesoft.com/studio/set-anypoint-platform-cloud, docs.mulesoft.com/mulesoft-mcp-server/getting-started-platform, docs.mulesoft.com/access-management/trusted-anypoint-platform-org, docs.mulesoft.com/mulesoft-mcp-server/reference-mcp-tools-platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MuleSoft Anypoint Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.