Every category where a model named Celigo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	12%	4 of 76	0%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Celigo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Celigo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels3

Paraphrase18 labels6

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall Balance: Celigo ... strikes a perfect middle ground between ease of use and power.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Choose Celigo if you want faster time-to-value and lower operational overhead” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · first choice

“Celigo: Best Overall for ERP-Centric & B2B E-Commerce Operations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Celigo as the best overall fit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Celigo, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Celigo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workato29 of 3416Not in the top three

Zapier26 of 343Not in the top three

Boomi24 of 341Not in the top three

Make21 of 344Not in the top three

MuleSoft17 of 340Not in the top three

Microsoft Power Automate14 of 340Not in the top three

n8n14 of 340Not in the top three

Tray.ai10 of 341Not in the top three

Jitterbit9 of 340Not in the top three

SnapLogic5 of 340Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Celigo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 34 answers that named Celigo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

frends.com3

appseconnect.com2

cazoomi.com2

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com2

dckap.com2

exalate.com2

g2.com2

gartner.com2

getapp.com2

partnerfleet.io2

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Celigo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appseconnect.com/blog/13-best-ipaas-solutions2

cazoomi.com/blog/top-ipaas-vendors-2025-comparison-features-pricing2

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/best-ipaas-platforms/1267865432

dckap.com/blog/ipaas-solutions-platforms2

exalate.com/blog/ipaas-solutions2

frends.com/answers/best-ipaas-platforms-2026-compared2

frends.com/insights/the-best-integration-platforms-ipaas-for-mid-sized-companies-in-europe2

g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-ipaas-for-small-business-software-integration2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Celigo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Celigo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at celigo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.