Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 3 of 63
3 categories · RankedCeligo
48Judge labels
10First choices
4Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Automation & iPaaS for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 67 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Celigo →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business3 of 68
5%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market3 of 67
12%18 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise17 of 101
0%16 labels
accepted challenger
In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Celigo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow automation and iPaaS | GTM data and infrastructure | 12% | 3 of 67 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 58 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% | |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 35 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Celigo held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Automation & iPaaS · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 63
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 17 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automation & iPaaS | 12% | 15% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 67 |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 104, unchanged |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Celigo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Celigo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase20 labels8
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative7 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Celigo and Workato are top picks due to their balance of ease of use, scalability, and strong B2B-focused features” Mistral Small · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“→ Start with Celigo. It hits the sweet spot of capability, cost, and usability for mid-market B2B.” Kimi K2 · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Celigo for most NetSuite‑centric or SaaS‑heavy stacks with a mix of IT and business users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Automation & iPaaS · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Celigo specifically wins if your core pain is ERP-centric operational integration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Celigo, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Celigo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Celigo, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Celigo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Celigo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 48 answers that named Celigo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
celigo.comYour site17
albato.com16
reply.com16
g2.com15
thedigitalprojectmanager.com14
appseconnect.com13
zapier.com13
blog.n8n.io12
frends.com12
expertbeacon.com10
121 of the 138 domain citations in answers naming Celigo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
celigo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Celigo takes 12% of first choices and Workato takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
celigo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Celigo takes 12% of first choices and Workato takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workflow automation and integration platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best workflow automation and integration platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“celigo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 140 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 9,670 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,721 · 127 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,008
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 42 clicks and $1,097 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
12%
rank 3 of 67 in automation & ipaas
Segment leader
28%
Workato
- First choices
- 10 across its categories
- Named in
- 48 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 44 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on celigo.com
2,243
subdomains included
Content
792
counted in the table below
Documentation
88
Product · Integration
54 · 1,044
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 450 | 36 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Case study | 110 | 3 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 86 | 5 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 82 | 9 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 27 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Conference or event | 12 | 3 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| News or press | 6 | 2 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-01-08 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Celigo topics native publish subscribe without a separate broker blog
- 2026-09-28End user credentials for mcp tools blog
- 2026-09-25Ipaas tools integration specialists blog
- 2026-09-25Celigo managed file transfer mft hosted sftp blog
- 2026-09-24Celigo on celigo cfo insider with steve sutter webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-24Data entry automation blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page celigo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Celigo
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Celigo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Celigo (integrator.io) 1
Follow Celigo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Celigo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Celigo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 rated iPaaS for enterprise automation
- For
- enterprise
- Free plan or trial
- 30-day free trial with full platform access celigo.com
- Integrations claimed
- 1000 celigo.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2SOC 2 complianceCCPAGDPRSOC 2 Type 2SOC 1 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- Hosting
- USA/EUUSA
- Customers named
- TherabodyPeak DesignWalmartRad Power BikesAmazonFactor BikesYamazaki USAThe Fruit Box Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price
What Celigo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: celigo.com, celigo.com, trust.celigo.com, celigo.com/platform, celigo.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Celigo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Celigo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Celigo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Celigo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Celigo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Celigo is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Celigo is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideCeligo is among the products AI models recommend first in Workflow automation and iPaaS this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.