Every category where a model named Tray.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	4%	7 of 76	13%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tray.ai yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tray.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	0	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	2	0	5
Kimi K2	1	1	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained9 labels2

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tier 1 Middleware platforms (like Workato, Tray.io, or Microsoft Fabric)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · scale prompt · first choice

“Default choice: Workato or Tray.ai” Kimi K2 · Automation & iPaaS · scale prompt · first choice

“Choose Workato/Tray.io if you are a large company connecting CRMs to ERPs, require audit trails” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · comparative prompt · alternative

“Bring in Tray.ai only if you're genuinely API-first or need serious AI agent governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid MuleSoft, Workato, and Tray.io (unless you are a major enterprise)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · hard negative

“powerful, but often overkill for smaller teams, and pricing/implementation complexity can be a major caution” Perplexity Sonar · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · soft negative

“Entirely quote-based pricing with no self-serve option—estimated $595+/month starting point” Kimi K2 · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tray.ai, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tray.ai was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workato44 of 4412Not in the top three

Zapier39 of 446Not in the top three

Make35 of 448Not in the top three

n8n27 of 442Not in the top three

Microsoft Power Automate26 of 442Not in the top three

Boomi24 of 441Not in the top three

MuleSoft21 of 441Not in the top three

Celigo10 of 444Not in the top three

Activepieces8 of 440Not in the top three

Pipedream8 of 440Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tray.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 44 answers that named Tray.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

stacksync.com3

ayautomate.com2

guideflow.com2

munro.agency2

albato.com1

alphabold.com1

analyticsinsight.net1

appseconnect.com1

atlassian.com1

cazoomi.com1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Tray.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ayautomate.com/blog/best-workflow-automation-platforms2

guideflow.com/blog/workflow-automation-platforms2

munro.agency/insights/top-workflow-automation-and-integration-platforms2

stacksync.com/blog/workflow-automation-tools-guide2

albato.com/blog/publications/best-ipaas-solutions-in-2024-comprehensive-guide-to-integrati1

alphabold.com/choosing-the-right-ipaas-platform1

analyticsinsight.net/automation/top-10-workflow-automation-platforms-in-20261

appseconnect.com/top-10-ipaas-platforms-of-2026-for-cios-it-leaders1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Tray.ai

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tray.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.

Tray.io 16Tray.io (Tray.ai) 1Tray.io (or Tray.ai) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tray.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tray.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trayai.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.