Celigo vs Tray.ai
One of twelve models named Celigo first on the direct prompt; zero named Tray.ai. Celigo was named by eleven of the twelve models and Tray.ai by eight and Celigo carries 18 labels and Tray.ai 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.
By framing
CeligoFirst choices, of twelve modelsTray.ai
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Celigo and Tray.ai were named in the same answer ten times, of the 34 answers naming Celigo and the 44 naming Tray.ai. In those answers Tray.ai took the first choice one time and Celigo four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Celigo Tray.ai first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Celigo on the left and Tray.ai on the right.The direct prompt
Celigo first, Tray.ai an alternative
1 of 12 modelsTray.ai was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Celigo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Best Overall Balance: Celigo ... strikes a perfect middle ground between ease of use and power.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Celigo if you want faster time-to-value and lower operational overhead” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Celigo: Best Overall for ERP-Centric & B2B E-Commerce Operations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Tray.ai
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid MuleSoft, Workato, and Tray.io (unless you are a major enterprise)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“powerful, but often overkill for smaller teams, and pricing/implementation complexity can be a major caution” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Entirely quote-based pricing with no self-serve option—estimated $595+/month starting point” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tier 1 Middleware platforms (like Workato, Tray.io, or Microsoft Fabric)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Default choice: Workato or Tray.ai” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Workato/Tray.io if you are a large company connecting CRMs to ERPs, require audit trails” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.