GTM AI Index
Index Vendors Factors.ai › Alternatives · September 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Factors.ai, as AI models named them

In the September 2026 Edition, 398 of the 432 answers collected in the two categories where Factors.ai holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 398 answers that did not name Factors.ai, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Account-based marketing platforms

Marketing. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Factors.ai is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessFactors.ai is #6 of 13 here at 2% of first choices, 11 labels.

Sixty-three of the seventy-two answers did not name Factors.ai; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those sixty-three answers, twenty-one products in all, the eight most named:

13 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketFactors.ai is #8 of 11 here at 2% of first choices, 11 labels.

Sixty-four of the seventy-two answers did not name Factors.ai; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those sixty-four answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:

4 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseFactors.ai holds 2 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-one of the seventy-two answers did not name Factors.ai; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-one answers, eight products in all:

The full enterprise standing →

Attribution and marketing mix modeling

Marketing. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Factors.ai is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessFactors.ai is #8 of 18 here at 4% of first choices, 12 labels.

Sixty-three of the seventy-two answers did not name Factors.ai; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those sixty-three answers, twenty-four products in all, the eight most named:

16 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketFactors.ai is #15 of 22 here at 1% of first choices, 13 labels.

Sixty-five of the seventy-two answers did not name Factors.ai; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those sixty-five answers, twenty-five products in all, the eight most named:

17 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseFactors.ai holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name Factors.ai; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, twenty-eight products in all, the eight most named:

20 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of twelve models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is seventy-two answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Factors.ai neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Factors.ai only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Factors.ai's side.

Every answer and every label is in the free record. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Factors.ai was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.