Every category where a model named Forecastr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Attribution and marketing mix modeling	Marketing	1%	20 of 124	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Forecastr yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Forecastr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform for a company with a limited budget is Forecastr” Llama 4 Maverick · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · first choice

“Forecastr offers a good balance of affordability and ease of use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · alternative

“Consider Forecastr for MMM + a separate attribution tool” MiniMax M2.5 · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · alternative

“lowest barrier among paid MMM tools” Grok 4.1 Fast · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Zero transparency: No access to coefficients, diagnostic plots, or model code” Kimi K2 · Attribution & MMM · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Forecastr, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Forecastr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Triple Whale19 of 255Not in the top three

Cometly19 of 251Not in the top three

Google Meridian19 of 250Not in the top three

Google Analytics 416 of 257Not in the top three

Meta Robyn16 of 250Not in the top three

Ruler Analytics15 of 252Not in the top three

Northbeam14 of 250Not in the top three

Recast14 of 250Not in the top three

Dreamdata12 of 252Not in the top three

Windsor.ai12 of 252Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Forecastr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Forecastr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at forecastr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.