Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 19% → 24%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
24%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 1 of 108, unchanged
6 categories · RankedDreamdata
125Judge labels
44First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
27% in Attribution & MMM for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 123 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
9 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 38 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Dreamdata →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business1 of 112
26%30 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 123
27%38 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 110
12%30 labels
accepted challenger
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Dreamdata for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 27% | 1 of 123 | 8% | 38 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 29% → 26%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 16 of 142 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Web analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 21 of 91 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 57% | |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 50 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 95 of 172 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% | |
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 64 of 117 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Dreamdata held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Attribution & MMM · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 29% → 26%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
26%from 29% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 112, unchanged
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 12% → 13%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution & MMM | 29% | 26% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 29% → 26%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 123, unchanged |
| Customer intel | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 16 of 142 |
| Web analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 21 of 91, unchanged |
| ABM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 71, unchanged |
| Market intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 95 of 172, unchanged |
| Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 81 → 64 of 117 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Dreamdata across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Dreamdata across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct53 labels26
Paraphrase40 labels17
Comparative16 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative125 labels in all, every segment counted; 44 of the 45 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Go with Dreamdata if you are a sales-led B2B business with deep content, long sales cycles, and you want precise, mathematically sound revenue attribution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Dreamdata or Factors.ai for attribution, and Google Meridian or Northbeam for MMM, would be the most balanced and effective choices.” Mistral Small · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Attribution: Dreamdata if your buying cycles are long, account-based, and you want B2B-specific multi-touch attribution tied to revenue” GPT-5.4 mini · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the strongest overall choice is usually Dreamdata if your priority is B2B revenue attribution and customer-journey analysis” Perplexity Sonar · Attribution & MMM · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"losing head-to-head comparisons" against competitors, with users actively seeking alternatives” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Attribution & MMM · negative prompt · soft negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Dreamdata starts at ~$750/month” Kimi K2 · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · soft negative
“but these are better fits when your budget is no longer very limited” Perplexity Sonar · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Dreamdata, over the 125 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dreamdata was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Dreamdata, over the 125 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dreamdata was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dreamdata. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 125 of the 125 answers that named Dreamdata and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cometly.com80
improvado.io66
guideflow.com54
segmentstream.com45
usermaven.com45
factors.ai44
admetrics.io41
hockeystack.com41
thecmo.com35
mcpanalytics.ai33
484 of the 484 domain citations in answers naming Dreamdata came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Dreamdata stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Dreamdata stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“dreamdata”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,088 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,148 · 45 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,103
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
27%
rank 1 of 123 in Attribution & MMM
First choices
44
across its categories
- Named in
- 125 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 125 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on dreamdata.io
1,033
subdomains included
Content
412
counted in the table below
Documentation
295
Product · Integration
9 · 42
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 260 | 6 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Podcast or video | 81 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Case study | 34 | 0 | 2025-10-13 | ||
| Comparison | 24 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2023-01-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Better ai gets more foundation matters blog
- 2026-09-22Scott brinker ai will change what marketers do blog
- 2026-09-07How to build b2b influencer program brianna doe blog
- 2026-08-31Data foundation dreamdata ai blog
- 2026-08-31Introducing dreamdata ai blog
- 2026-07-03Leslie venetz why your b2b outbound is killing your brand blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page dreamdata.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Dreamdata
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Dreamdata; a claim can dispute any of them.
Dreamdata (B2B) 1
Follow Dreamdata
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Dreamdata is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Dreamdata is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic B2B Attribution Platform for Marketers; B2B revenue attribution platform
- For
- B2B marketers
- Price stated
- Free Tier; Custom / Business dreamdata.io
- Starting price
- 0 dreamdata.io
- Free plan or trial
- Free Tier; SIGN UP FREE dreamdata.io
- Certifications
- SSO & SAML login (SCIM available as an add-on)
- Customers named
- FinastraCognismOysterClioECIEftsureGorgiasComplyAdvantage
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Dreamdata's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dreamdata.io, dreamdata.io/pricing, trust.dreamdata.io, dreamdata.io/use-cases/optimize-ad-spend, dreamdata.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dreamdata's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dreamdata, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dreamdata by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Dreamdata is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dreamdata, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Dreamdata is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Dreamdata is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Dreamdata first in Attribution and marketing mix modeling this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.