| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 0% | 115 of 123 | 50% | 10 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 126 of 142 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Web analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 37 of 91 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 57% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intel | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 126 of 142 |
| Attribution & MMM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 115 of 123 |
| Web analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 91, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with HockeyStack or Bizible if you need B2B-specific features. HockeyStack offers better value and faster implementation” MiniMax M2.5 · Attribution & MMM · direct prompt · alternative
“"Best for B2B companies with long sales cycles needing pipeline and revenue attribution."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Attribution & MMM · direct prompt · alternative
“If You're Salesforce-First Adobe Marketo Measure - Deep Salesforce integration” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Adobe Marketo Measure - Best for Adobe/Salesforce Ecosystem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Web analytics · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Skip Enterprise (Adobe, Bizible): 3-6 month setups, $15K+/yr minimum—overkill” Grok 4.1 Fast · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise legacy platforms (like Adobe Marketo Measure/Bizible) are often too expensive and require a dedicated data engineering team to maintain” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer intel · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“such as Adobe Analytics and Bizible, because implementation complexity can overwhelm teams that do not have dedicated analytics resources” Perplexity Sonar · Attribution & MMM · negative prompt · soft negative
“ideal if you are Salesforce-native ... though it leans more toward enterprise” Mistral Small · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 60 answers that named Adobe Marketo Measure and are not a share of its labels.
244 of the 244 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Marketo Measure came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Adobe Marketo Measure's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: adobe.com/products/adobeconnect/test-form-marketo.html, adobe.com/accessibility/compliance/adobe-marketo-2020-acr.html, helpx.adobe.com/customer-care-office-hours/aem/Marketo-Smart-Campaigns.html, helpx.adobe.com/customer-care-office-hours/marketo/marketo-smartcampaigns.html, adobe.com/accessibility/compliance/marketo-accessibility-conformance-report-december-2025.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Marketo Measure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Marketo Measure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Marketo Measure by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: