Nine of twelve models named Dreamdata first on the direct prompt; zero named Measured. Dreamdata was named by twelve of the twelve models and Measured by eleven and Dreamdata carries 43 labels and Measured 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the attribution and marketing mix modeling page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Dreamdata and Measured were named in the same answer thirty-eight times, of the 128 answers naming Dreamdata and the 70 naming Measured. In those answers Measured took the first choice four times and Dreamdata eight.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Steep learning curve, rigid/non-customizable dashboards, slow data syncs, clunky reporting.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve with overwhelming reports; Integration challenges” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Too narrow for most enterprise needs” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“For B2B SaaS, top choices include Dreamdata (B2B pipeline attribution)... strong fit for pipeline- and revenue-focused B2B measurement.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The recommended attribution and MMM tool for a mid-sized B2B company is Dreamdata, HockeyStack, or Factors.ai” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Dreamdata is the strongest default — it's purpose-built for the multi-person buying committee problem” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid for B2B mid-market: Enterprise heavies (Adobe Mix Modeler, Measured: custom/$50K+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · hard negative
“strong but more enterprise-oriented and stitched-together; pricing scales higher” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Tier 2 | Modern / SaaS-Enabled UMM & Causal MMM | Recast, Measured, Lifesight, Mutinex, LiftLab, Haus” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Measured | Enterprise hybrid; causal MMM + MTA ... Finance-friendly; geo-holdouts.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Measured | Incrementality-first, finance-friendly, enterprise integrations” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.