GTM AI Index
Index Marketing Attribution & MMM › Recast vs Measured
Attribution and marketing mix modeling · September 2026 Edition

Recast vs Measured

Two of twelve models named Recast first on the direct prompt; zero named Measured. Recast was named by ten of the twelve models and Measured by eleven and Recast carries 35 labels and Measured 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Recast

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Measured

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share9%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 22; printed, not drawn.
Labels3524A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Recast reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Dreamdata was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Dreamdata vs Recast · Dreamdata vs Measured · Google Analytics 4 vs Recast

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the attribution and marketing mix modeling page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
RecastFirst choices, of twelve modelsMeasured
Direct201 against Measured
Paraphrase101 against Recast · 1 against Measured
Comparative01
Budget-constrained001 against Recast
Scale-constrained33
Negative101 against Recast
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Recast and Measured were named in the same answer forty-nine times, of the 79 answers naming Recast and the 70 naming Measured. In those answers Measured took the first choice seven times and Recast four.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Recast and Measured stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Recast Measured first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Recast on the left and Measured on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Recast and Measured stood in it.

Recast first, Measured an alternative

2 of 12 modelsMeasured was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallDreamdata, Recast alternatives: Cometly, HockeyStack, Improvado, Measured, MixModeler, Ruler Analytics
MiniMax M2.5Dreamdata, Recast, SegmentStream alternatives: Analytic Edge, HubSpot Marketing Hub

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastDreamdata alternatives: HockeyStack, Recast, RevSure
DeepSeek V4 FlashDreamdata, HockeyStack, Rockerbox alternatives: Improvado, Recast, Ruler Analytics, SegmentStream, Sellforte
Qwen 3.7 FlashRockerbox alternatives: Alviss AI, Recast
Kimi K2Dreamdata alternatives: Factors.ai, HockeyStack, Recast, Rockerbox
GLM 4.7 FlashXDreamdata, SegmentStream alternatives: Heeet, HockeyStack, Lifesight, Measured, MixModeler, Northbeam, Recast, Ruler Analytics

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Dreamdata alternatives: CaliberMind, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Northbeam
GPT-5.4 miniDreamdata alternatives: Adobe Marketo Measure, CaliberMind, MixModeler
Gemini 3.5 FlashCaliberMind alternatives: Dreamdata, HockeyStack, RevSure
Perplexity SonarDreamdata alternatives: Factors.ai, HockeyStack
Llama 4 MaverickImprovado alternatives: Dreamdata, Rockerbox

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Recast0%#14 of 18
Measured0%#17 of 18
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Recast leads by four points.
Recast9%#3 of 22
Measured4%#4 of 22
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Measured leads at enterprise.
Measured9%#4 of 21
Recast2%#10 of 21
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Recast

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Far too expensive for limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Built for Statisticians, Not Marketers ... Requires a data scientist to translate Bayesian posteriors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Recast/Funnel are solid but more digital-heavy/enterprise (~$50K+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“You likely want to focus on Tier 2 (SaaS-Enabled UMM): Recast, Measured, Lifesight, Mutinex, LiftLab, Haus” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Recast and Measured being more suitable for mid-market digital teams and enterprises, respectively” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · first choice
“Recast is the standout — transparent Bayesian models, weekly refreshes, and a fast setup” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Measured

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid for B2B mid-market: Enterprise heavies (Adobe Mix Modeler, Measured: custom/$50K+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · hard negative
“strong but more enterprise-oriented and stitched-together; pricing scales higher” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Tier 2 | Modern / SaaS-Enabled UMM & Causal MMM | Recast, Measured, Lifesight, Mutinex, LiftLab, Haus” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Measured | Enterprise hybrid; causal MMM + MTA ... Finance-friendly; geo-holdouts.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Measured | Incrementality-first, finance-friendly, enterprise integrations” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.