Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 13% → 6%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 4 of 71, unchanged
1 category · Ranked ClaimedZenABM
21Judge labels
6First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in ABM for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 74
5%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 71
6%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In abm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ZenABM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 6% | 5 of 71 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ZenABM held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ABM · by segment
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 4 of 64, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABM | 5% | 7% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 5 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ZenABM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ZenABM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained10 labels6
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ZenABM (starting at $59/mo) is the most cost-effective and modern tool on the market for small teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ABM · budget prompt · first choice
“my top pick would be ZenABM if you want the lowest-cost option” GPT-5.4 mini · ABM · budget prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Recommendation: ZenABM (from $59/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ABM · budget prompt · first choice
“A niche, LinkedIn-focused ABM tool starting at ~$59/month, ideal for teams wanting to prove ROI quickly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ABM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ZenABM, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZenABM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ZenABM, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZenABM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZenABM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named ZenABM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
zenabm.comYour site18
pipeline.zoominfo.com12
abmatic.ai10
prospeo.io10
blog.hubspot.com8
relydigital.com8
demandbase.com7
albato.com6
marketbetter.ai6
apollo.io5
Seventy-two of the ninety domain citations in answers naming ZenABM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
zenabm.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ZenABM takes 6% of first choices and AdRoll ABM takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
zenabm.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ZenABM takes 6% of first choices and AdRoll ABM takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “account-based marketing platform”
5
Position for “best account-based marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“zenabm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,020 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 368 · 14 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 322
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 5 of 71 in ABM
Segment leader
53%
AdRoll ABM
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on zenabm.com
3,689
subdomains included
Content
674
counted in the table below
Documentation
38
Product · Integration
45 · 20
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 385 | 31 | 2026-09-13 | ABM, CRM | |
| Comparison | 224 | 2 | 2026-09-21 | ABM, CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 21 | 0 | 2026-04-03 | ABM, CRM | |
| Case study | 12 | 0 | 2026-05-06 | ABM | |
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2026-02-01 | ABM | |
| Template or tool | 10 | 1 | 2026-08-01 | ABM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | ABM | |
| Report or ebook | 5 | 0 | 2026-02-01 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2025-11-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Fibbler vs zenabm for abm comparison
- 2026-09-20Fibbler alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-13Cheap linkedin ad formats abm on small budget blog
- 2026-08-30Building a linkedin ads full funnel structure for abm blog
- 2026-08-30An ai workflow for linkedin abm reporting four loops one source of truth blog
- 2026-08-27Optimize linkedin ads with chatgpt blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page zenabm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ZenABM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ZenABM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ZenABM is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- All-in-one platform for ABM on LinkedIn
- For
- B2B marketers, demand gen teams, sales teams, and RevOps professionals
- Price stated
- Pricing starts from $59 per month and does not depend on your ad spend. No markups, no hidden fees. zenabm.com
- Starting price
- 59 zenabm.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try ZenABM free for 37 days — no setup fees, no credit card required. zenabm.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 zenabm.com/pricing
- Customers named
- ProductiveSpeargrowthValueshipsFlowfuse
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What ZenABM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zenabm.com, zenabm.com/pricing, zenabm.com/use-cases/abm-agencies, zenabm.com/case-studies, zenabm.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claimed
Claimed by ZenABM
Verified contact: MJ, Founder, ZenABM, since September 13, 2026. Claiming changes nothing in the data: the labels, shares and verdicts on this page are the models' and the judge's alone. The edition's vendor brief for ZenABM goes to the verified contact by email.
Run Account Based Marketing Campaigns on LinkedIn more effectively Description supplied by ZenABM.