2 categories · Ranked ClaimedZenABM
47Judge labels
11First choices
0Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in ABM for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business4 of 77
13%32 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 76
5%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In abm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ZenABM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 5% | 4 of 76 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 40 of 62 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bombora at 35% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ZenABM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated ZenABM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative13 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels8
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“start with RollWorks or ZenABM ... ZenABM if you're LinkedIn-focused and want to start as low as $59/month” Kimi K2 · ABM · budget prompt · first choice
“Cheapest full-featured ABM entry point; all core features included” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ABM · budget prompt · first choice
“ZenABM Starter: Low-cost LinkedIn ABM engagement” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ABM · budget prompt · first choice
“If LinkedIn is your primary channel: Consider ZenABM for its focused LinkedIn integration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ABM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ZenABM, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZenABM was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZenABM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 47 answers that named ZenABM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
abmatic.ai2
cleverly.co2
demandbase.com2
g2.com2
gartner.com2
nrich.io2
tofuhq.com2
trustradius.com2
ventureharbour.com2
zenabm.comYour site2
Eighteen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming ZenABM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as ZenABM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZenABM; a claim can dispute any of them.
ZenABM Starter 2
Claimed
Claimed by ZenABM
Verified contact: MJ, Founder, ZenABM, since September 13, 2026. Claiming changes nothing in the data: the labels, shares and verdicts on this page are the models' and the judge's alone.
Run Account Based Marketing Campaigns on LinkedIn more effectively Description supplied by ZenABM.