Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 55 → 39 of 108
2 categories · RankedSegmentStream
34Judge labels
4First choices
6Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Attribution & MMM for enterprise buyers
Rank 26 of 123 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SegmentStream →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business32 of 112
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market26 of 123
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise7 of 110
7%14 labels
accepted challenger
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SegmentStream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 0% | 26 of 123 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 75 of 83 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 40% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SegmentStream held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Attribution & MMM · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 10 → 25 of 112
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution & MMM | 3% | 0% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 26 of 123 |
| Warehouse & ETL | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 75 of 83, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SegmentStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SegmentStream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels1
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SegmentStream, Dreamdata, and HockeyStack are the platforms with the strongest alignment to complex, full-funnel revenue measurement” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Attribution & MMM · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose SegmentStream if your priority is a broader attribution stack” Perplexity Sonar · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“SegmentStream (Best for Cookieless & Predictive Attribution)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Attribution & MMM · direct prompt · alternative
“SegmentStream is the strongest signal in the results” Perplexity Sonar · Attribution & MMM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Only worth it if you're spending $50K+/month on ads (their minimum). Skip if below that.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · hard negative
“*Why avoid?* SegmentStream is only suitable for teams with advanced measurement needs” Mistral Small · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SegmentStream, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SegmentStream was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SegmentStream, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SegmentStream was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SegmentStream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 34 answers that named SegmentStream and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
segmentstream.comYour site27
cometly.com26
improvado.io24
factors.ai17
guideflow.com17
admetrics.io16
usermaven.com14
hockeystack.com11
integrate.com11
mcpanalytics.ai11
147 of the 174 domain citations in answers naming SegmentStream came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
segmentstream.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SegmentStream takes 0% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
segmentstream.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SegmentStream takes 0% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“segmentstream”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 781 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 429 · 16 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 573
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 123 in Attribution & MMM
Segment leader
27%
Dreamdata
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 33 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on segmentstream.com
221
subdomains included
Content
102
counted in the table below
Documentation
82
Product · Integration
0 · 9
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 45 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Comparison | 37 | 0 | 2026-03-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2026-02-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15New integrations amplitude openai ads stackadapt blog
- 2026-06-17Best mcp servers for claude blog
- 2026-06-17Best mcp servers for gemini blog
- 2026-06-17Best mcp servers for perplexity blog
- 2026-06-16Best mcp servers for chatgpt codex blog
- 2026-06-16Best warehouse native attribution tools blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page segmentstream.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SegmentStream
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SegmentStream is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SegmentStream is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Infrastructure that gives AI agents a marketing measurement brain; the marketing measurement engine for teams and AI Agents.
- For
- teams and AI Agents
- Price stated
- Pricing is per project, with no seat cap, so your whole team works from the same numbers. segmentstream.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 30 segmentstream.com
- Certifications
- DPA and GDPR compliance
- Hosting
- US/EUEUUS
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, customers
What SegmentStream's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: segmentstream.com, segmentstream.com/pricing, segmentstream.com/trust, segmentstream.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SegmentStream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SegmentStream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SegmentStream by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SegmentStream is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SegmentStream, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.