Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 5 → 21 of 108
1 category · Named, not rankedMixModeler
12Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MixModeler was named 5 times in Attribution & MMM, where Dreamdata led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 112
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 123
5%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MixModeler for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 5% | 7 of 123 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 1% → 5%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MixModeler held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Attribution & MMM · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 1% → 5%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 18 → 6 of 112
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution & MMM | 1% | 5% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 1% → 5%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 7 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MixModeler across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MixModeler across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MixModeler (free tier) for marketing mix modeling — it's one of the few options with a genuine free tier for smaller teams” MiniMax M2.5 · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually MixModeler if you specifically want marketing mix modeling (MMM)” GPT-5.4 mini · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · first choice
“MixModeler is the top pick for MMM” Mistral Small · Attribution & MMM · direct prompt · first choice
“Best value pick. ... MixModeler offers unmatched value.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“generally best for mid-sized businesses with significant ad spend” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MixModeler, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MixModeler was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MixModeler, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MixModeler was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MixModeler. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named MixModeler and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cometly.com9
medium.com7
admetrics.io5
improvado.io5
learn.g2.com5
sourceforge.net5
thecmo.com5
usermaven.com5
lifesight.io4
mcpanalytics.ai4
Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming MixModeler came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mixmodeler.com
13
subdomains included
Content
5
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 4 | 0 | 2025-01-15 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2025-01-15 |
Most recent
- 2025-01-15Mmm vs multi touch attribution comparison
- 2025-01-15How to build first marketing mix model blog
- 2025-01-15Death of cookies mmm importance blog
- 2025-01-15Complete guide marketing mix modeling blog
- 2025-01-15Bayesian marketing mix modeling guide blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mixmodeler.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow MixModeler
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MixModeler is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MixModeler is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Advanced marketing mix modeling for modern marketing teams.
- For
- marketing teams
- Price stated
- Free / $149/month / $239/month / Custom mixmodeler.com
- Starting price
- Free mixmodeler.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free forever plan mixmodeler.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What MixModeler's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mixmodeler.com, mixmodeler.com, mixmodeler.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MixModeler's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MixModeler, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MixModeler by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MixModeler is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MixModeler, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.