Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 30 → 13 of 108
1 category · RankedCassandra
19Judge labels
3First choices
3Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Attribution & MMM for small business buyers
Rank 15 of 123 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 112
3%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market15 of 123
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise92 of 110
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Cassandra for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 2% | 15 of 123 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Cassandra held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Attribution & MMM · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 33 → 16 of 112
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 18 → 84 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution & MMM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 15 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Cassandra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Cassandra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Cassandra (no-code Robyn wrapper from ~$1K/mo) is likely the most accessible entry point” Kimi K2 · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · first choice
“AI-native SaaS MMM, automated data ingestion & model calibration... no coding needed” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Attribution & MMM · comparative prompt · first choice
“It is not "cheap" in absolute terms, but it is highly cost-effective compared to traditional enterprise agencies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“❌ $1,000+/month starting price | Designed for significant ad spend ($50K+/month)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cassandra, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cassandra was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cassandra, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cassandra was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cassandra. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named Cassandra and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cometly.com14
segmentstream.com13
improvado.io12
mcpanalytics.ai12
thecmo.com11
activecampaign.com8
admetrics.io8
guideflow.com8
matomo.org8
owox.com8
102 of the 102 domain citations in answers naming Cassandra came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cassandra.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cassandra takes 2% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cassandra.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cassandra takes 2% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 33,100 a month (“cassandra”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13,992 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 429 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 395 · 9 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 198
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 123 in Attribution & MMM
Segment leader
27%
Dreamdata
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 19 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cassandra.app
305
subdomains included
Content
169
counted in the table below
Documentation
47
Product · Integration
50 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 77 | 4 | 2026-10-04 | ||
| Blog | 40 | 28 | 2026-10-05 | ||
| Comparison | 32 | 31 | 2026-10-04 | ||
| Case study | 18 | 6 | 2026-10-04 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-05Ai marketer blog
- 2026-10-04Academy glossary or explainer
- 2026-10-04Compare comparison
- 2026-10-04Gina tricot v3 draft case study
- 2026-10-04Treedom v3 draft case study
- 2026-10-04Charity water v3 draft case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cassandra.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Cassandra
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cassandra is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Cassandra is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Marketing Decision Intelligence Platform
- For
- CMO, VP Marketing, Head of Growth, Performance Marketing Director, Marketing Analytics Manager
- Price stated
- €0 cassandra.app
- Starting price
- 0 cassandra.app
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial — no credit card required cassandra.app
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2
- Customers named
- Gina TricotCura of SwedenBoscolo ViaggiVelascacharity: waterTreedomSpedire.comAskRally
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Cassandra's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cassandra.app, cassandra.app/pricing, trust.cassandra.app, cassandra.app/platform, cassandra.app/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cassandra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cassandra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cassandra by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cassandra is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cassandra, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.