CPQ
Asked as “CPQ software”, and as “configure, price, quote tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
57%
Consensus
57DealHub15PandaDoc09QuoteWerks19others
57% of first choices, consensus.
Since September 2026▼−4Since September 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.DealHub held the lead, −4 points on 62%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc45%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
DealHub57%Consensus▼−4Since September 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Salesforce Revenue Cloud49%Clear leader▼−12Since September 2026: 61% → 49%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
PandaDoc45%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 54% → 47%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketDealHub57%Consensus▼−4Since September 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseSalesforce Revenue Cloud49%Clear leader▼−12Since September 2026: 61% → 49%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01DealHub57%9%57endorsed leader▼−4Since September 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.62% → 58%
DealHub57%9%57endorsed leader▼−4Since September 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.62% → 58%02PandaDoc15%7%41accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 13% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 16%
PandaDoc15%7%41accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 13% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 16%03
QuoteWerks9%4%23accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 9%
QuoteWerks9%4%23accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 9%04
Conga CPQ4%23%35accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Conga CPQ4%23%35accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%05
HubSpot Commerce Hub2%4%25accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
HubSpot Commerce Hub2%4%25accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%06
Proposify2%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Proposify2%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%07Salesforce Revenue Cloud2%44%66criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Salesforce Revenue Cloud2%44%66criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11SAP CPQ0%38%26criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
12
Oracle CPQ0%38%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle CPQ0%38%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
PROS Smart CPQ0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
PROS Smart CPQ0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Tacton0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Tacton0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Experlogix0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Experlogix0%8%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
DealHub vs HubSpot Commerce HubDealHub vs ProposifyDealHub vs Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDoc vs QuoteWerksPandaDoc vs Conga CPQPandaDoc vs HubSpot Commerce HubPandaDoc vs ProposifyPandaDoc vs Salesforce Revenue CloudQuoteWerks vs Conga CPQQuoteWerks vs HubSpot Commerce HubQuoteWerks vs ProposifyQuoteWerks vs Salesforce Revenue CloudConga CPQ vs HubSpot Commerce HubConga CPQ vs ProposifyConga CPQ vs Salesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hub vs ProposifyHubSpot Commerce Hub vs Salesforce Revenue CloudProposify vs Salesforce Revenue Cloud
One product takes 57% of first choices here, so the chart would put eleven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Three products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Twelve of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini and Mistral Small changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud44%
29 of 66 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Salesforce CPQ is now end of sale for new customers... Any CPQ that is being phased out or has a clear successor you'd be forced to migrate to soon.” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
Oracle CPQ38%
12 of 32 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“avoid enterprise-grade CPQs like Salesforce CPQ, Oracle CPQ Cloud, or DealHub initially” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
SAP CPQ
38%
10 of 26 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“If you are not already deeply embedded in the SAP ecosystem (S/4HANA, ECC), **avoid**.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Conga CPQ23%
8 of 35 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“some Conga products are described as hard to configure and difficult for teams to troubleshoot without vendor support” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
81 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 991 links across 186 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Qobra44 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Albato35 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow33 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Monday.com32 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 70 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Everstage26 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · PandaDoc24 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Conga24 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
vendor site · DealHub23 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · BetterCommerce19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
43 answers · 12 models
35 answers · 12 models
32 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 9 models
23 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cpq software”, “cpq software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DealHub dealhub.io | 57% | 175 | 1,900 | 83 | 319,299 | $372 | 62 | 1 |
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 15% | 527 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | |
| QuoteWerks quotewerks.com | 9% | 84 | 1,300 | 22 | 3,244 | 27 | 5 | |
| Bitrix24 bitrix24.com | 6% | 37 | 5,400 | 90 | 69,160 | 104 | ||
| Conga CPQ conga.com | 4% | 108 | 320 | 19 | 46,363 | $224 | 120 | |
| HubSpot parent site HubSpot Commerce Hub 2% | 2% | 72 | 368,000 | 9,776 | ||||
| Proposify proposify.com | 2% | 274 | 3,600 | 28 | 38,103 | 27 | ||
| Odoo odoo.com | 2% | 23 | 49,500 | 3,053 | 406,262 | $644 | 95 | |
| Zoho parent site Zoho CRM 2%, Zoho CPQ 0% | 2% | 332 | 49,500 | 660 | ||||
| Salesforce parent site Salesforce Revenue Cloud 2% | 2% | 215 | 550,000 | 60,632 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (dealhub.io, g2.com, monday.com). The first result for “best cpq software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best CPQ software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which configure, price, quote tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top CPQ tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best CPQ software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a CPQ software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which CPQ tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DealHubDealHubHeldno first choiceBitrix24, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: DealHub, Epicor CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, PriceFx CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce HubFour alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, Proposify, Salesforce Revenue CloudThree alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Odoo, QuoteWerksGPT-5.4 miniDealHubConga CPQ, DealHubChangedSalesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudOne alternative
Salesforce Revenue CloudFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQOne alternative
Conga Advantage CPQGemini 3.5 FlashDealHubagainst: HubSpot’s built-in CPQ/Revenue Hub, Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubHeldagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, ProposifyQuoteWerksagainst: Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: "In-House" Custom CPQ Systems, Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Five alternatives
Epicor CPQ, Experlogix, NetSuite CPQ, Nue, PandaDocFive alternatives
Epicor CPQ, Experlogix, MonetizeNow, Nue, PandaDocFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, ServiceNow CPQ, TactonFour alternatives
HubSpot Sales Hub, Kickflip, PandaDoc, Zoho CPQThree alternatives
Experlogix, Logik.io, PandaDocPerplexity SonarDealHubDealHubHeldagainst: Oracle CPQno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQBitrix24, QuoteWerksno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BetterCommerce, Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue CloudTwo alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocOne alternative
PandaDocGrok 4.1 FastDealHubagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubHeldagainst: PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choicePandaDocagainst: DealHub, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubagainst: QuoteWerksagainst: Apttus, Bigmachines, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, PandaDocTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, QuoteWerksThree alternatives
Bitrix24, QuoteWerks, QuotientFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue CloudMistral SmallDealHubDealHub, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedSalesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, Proposifyno first choiceagainst: Vendavo
Two alternatives
Proposify, RevalizeFive alternatives
Bitrix24, DealHub, Price f, SAP CPQ, Sculptor CPQTwo alternatives
QuoteWerks, iQuoteXpressDeepSeek V4 FlashDealHubagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubHeldno first choicePandaDoc, QuoteWerksagainst: Conga CPQ, DealHub, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce HubFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue CloudSeven alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudTwo alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, KickflipLlama 4 MaverickDealHubDealHubHeldno first choicePandaDocno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Experlogix, Zuora CPQTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, Zuora CPQQwen 3.7 FlashDealHubDealHubHeldagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocagainst: DealHub, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, ServiceNow CPQ, Zuora CPQ
Four alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQTwo alternatives
Experlogix, PandaDocFive alternatives
Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Tacton, Zoho CPQThree alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, QuoteWerksKimi K2DealHubagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubHeldagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceBitrix24, Odoono first choiceagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocEight alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Experlogix, PandaDoc, ProPricer, QuoteWerks, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudFour alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, MRPeasy, Monday.com, PandaDocFour alternatives
DealHub, PandaDoc, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudGLM 4.7 FlashXDealHubagainst: Conga CPQDealHubHeldno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Dock, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
Combeenation, ExperlogixThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Logik.ioNine alternatives
HubSpot CRM, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Infor CPQ, Monday.com, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, Qwilr, Zoho CPQ, Zoho CRMMiniMax M2.5DealHubDealHubHeldagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudQuoteWerksno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue CloudThree alternatives
Monday.com CPQ, PandaDoc, ProposifyFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQFour alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Jobber, PandaDoc, ProposifyTwo alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Salesforce Revenue CloudGPT-6 LunaDealHubDealHubHeldno first choiceagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudZoho CRMagainst: Conga CPQno first choiceagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue CloudThree alternatives
Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, TactonSix alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TactonOne alternative
Zoho BillingMuse Glimmer 30BDealHubagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubHeldno first choicePandaDoc, QuoteWerksConga CPQ, DealHubagainst: Cincom CPQ, Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Two alternatives
Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue CloudTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud CPQThree alternatives
Kickflip, MRPeasy, ProposifyBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:16 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 15 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:46 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:24 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:19 | yes | 3 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:10 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 8 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 17 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:52 | yes | 12 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 11 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 17 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:28 | yes | 17 | 199 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:21 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 8 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 12 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:45 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:47 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:53 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:25 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 14 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 14 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 12 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:59 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:02 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:50 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 24 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 19 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:28 | yes | 25 | 306 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Cincom read as Cincom CPQ
Conga read as Conga CPQ
HubSpot read as HubSpot Commerce Hub
HubSpot native read as HubSpot Commerce Hub
Oracle read as Oracle CPQ
PROS read as PROS Smart CPQ
PROS CPQ read as PROS Smart CPQ
SAP read as SAP CPQ
Salesforce (Agentforce Revenue Management) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Now Salesforce Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (SteelBrick) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (now Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ / Revenue Cloud read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce Revenue Management read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Zoho CRM CPQ read as Zoho CPQ
Unresolved, counted raw
"In-House" Custom CPQ Systems
Agentforce Revenue Management, formerly Salesforce Revenue Cloud
BetterCommerce CPQ
Combeenation
Datto Commerce (formerly Gluh)
Dealsign
HubSpot’s built-in CPQ/Revenue Hub
Logik.ai
Microsoft Dynamics 365 CPQ
Multiply CPQ
Price f(x)
PriceFx CPQ
ProPricer
ProsperStack
Salesforce Revenue Cloud CPQ
Vendr
altaFlow
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.