Contract lifecycle management and e-signature
Asked as “contract lifecycle management platform”, and as “e-signature and contract management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
23%
Contested · Concord 19%
23PandaDoc19Concord17Juro40others
23% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.PandaDoc held the lead, ±0 points on 25%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc43%Clear leader▼−9Since September 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc23%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Icertis Contract Intelligence21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Icertis Contract Intelligence (22%) replaces Ironclad (22% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →
PandaDoc43%Clear leader▼−9Since September 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc23%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseIcertis Contract Intelligence21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Icertis Contract Intelligence (22%) replaces Ironclad (22% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01PandaDoc23%6%35accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 25%
PandaDoc23%6%35accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 25%02
Concord19%3%35accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 6% → 18%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 18%
Concord19%3%35accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 6% → 18%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 18%03
Juro17%3%33accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 16% → 18%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 18%
Juro17%3%33accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 16% → 18%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 18%04
Ironclad15%20%59accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 12% → 14%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 14%
Ironclad15%20%59accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 12% → 14%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 14%05
Zoho Contracts8%8%12accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 7%
Zoho Contracts8%8%12accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 12% → 7%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 7%06
DocuSign CLM4%32%38criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
DocuSign CLM4%32%38criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%07
DocuSign2%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
DocuSign2%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%08
Conga CLM2%30%33criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Conga CLM2%30%33criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%09
ContractWorks2%20%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
ContractWorks2%20%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Icertis Contract Intelligence0%42%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Icertis Contract Intelligence0%42%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Agiloft0%28%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Agiloft0%28%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14
Sirion0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Sirion0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
ContractSafe0%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
ContractSafe0%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%11
SpotDraft0%6%16accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 0%
SpotDraft0%6%16accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 0%10
LinkSquares0%0%25accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
LinkSquares0%0%25accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
PandaDoc vs Zoho ContractsPandaDoc vs DocuSign CLMPandaDoc vs DocuSignPandaDoc vs Conga CLMConcord vs JuroConcord vs IroncladConcord vs Zoho ContractsConcord vs DocuSign CLMConcord vs DocuSignConcord vs Conga CLMJuro vs IroncladJuro vs Zoho ContractsJuro vs DocuSign CLMJuro vs DocuSignJuro vs Conga CLMIronclad vs Zoho ContractsIronclad vs DocuSign CLMIronclad vs DocuSignIronclad vs Conga CLMZoho Contracts vs DocuSign CLMZoho Contracts vs DocuSignZoho Contracts vs Conga CLMDocuSign CLM vs DocuSignDocuSign CLM vs Conga CLMDocuSign vs Conga CLM
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01PandaDoc23%
PandaDoc23%02Concord19%
Concord19%03Juro17%
Juro17%04Ironclad15%
Ironclad15%05Zoho Contracts8%
Zoho Contracts8%06DocuSign CLM4%
DocuSign CLM4%07DocuSign2%
DocuSign2%08Conga CLM2%
Conga CLM2%09ContractWorks2%
ContractWorks2%10LinkSquares0%
LinkSquares0%11SpotDraft0%
SpotDraft0%12ContractSafe0%
ContractSafe0%13Agiloft0%
Agiloft0%14Sirion0%
Sirion0%15Icertis Contract Intelligence0%
Icertis Contract Intelligence0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
DocuSign CLM32%
12 of 38 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“A well-known name, but with notable recurring complaints... The biggest cautions are around **Conga CLM** and **DocuSign CLM**” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Conga CLM30%
10 of 33 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Customer reviews show high levels of dissatisfaction with feature usability, interface design and overall scalability” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Ironclad20%
12 of 59 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid vendors like Ironclad, Agiloft, Icertis, and ContractPodAI if budget predictability matters” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Icertis Contract Intelligence42%
10 of 24 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Implementation is lengthy and demanding... dramatically overkill for organizations under 500 employees.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1066 links across 202 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 3 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Conga42 answers · 44 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Bind39 answers · 91 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 57 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Oneflow29 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
29 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sirion22 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zylo22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Concord21 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
vendor site · PandaDoc20 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ContractSafe19 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 12 models
30 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 11 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best contract lifecycle management platform”, “contract lifecycle management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 23% | 527 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 |
| Concord concord.app | 19% | 89 | 246,000 | 58,369 | 18,445 | ||
| Juro juro.com | 17% | 62 | 2,900 | 536 | 44,442 | $168 | 120 |
| Ironclad ironcladapp.com | 15% | 133 | 49,500 | 3,365 | 128,319 | 120 | |
| Zoho parent site Zoho Contracts 8% | 8% | 26 | 390 | 8 | |||
| DocuSign docusign.com DocuSign CLM 4%, DocuSign 2% | 6% | 110 | 1,000,000 | 9,641 | 2,280,470 | $20 | 120 |
| Bind bindlegal.com Bind 2%, Bind Legal 2% | 4% | 13 | 33,100 | 99,561 | |||
| Conga CLM conga.com | 2% | 77 | 480 | 11 | 46,363 | $224 | 120 |
| Oneflow oneflow.com | 2% | 18 | 1,000 | 11 | 39,547 | 13 | |
| ContractWorks contractworks.com | 2% | 33 | 720 | 3 | 1,720 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com). The first result for “best contract lifecycle management platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which e-signature and contract management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top contract lifecycle management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a contract lifecycle management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which contract lifecycle management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Concordno first choiceChangedno first choiceZoho Contractsno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, Conga CLM, Contractbook, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SAP Ariba Contracts, SpotDraft
Two alternatives
Ironclad, LinkSquaresFour alternatives
CLM 365, Concord, ContractWorks, PandaDocGPT-5.4 miniIroncladagainst: Icertis Contract IntelligenceDocuSignChangedIcertis Contract IntelligencePandaDocagainst: DocuSignno first choiceagainst: Corcentric / Determine, Malbek, SAP CLM, Summize, Workday CLM
Two alternatives
Conga CLM, DocuSign CLMTwo alternatives
Ironclad, PandaDocSix alternatives
Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, LinkSquares, SirionGemini 3.5 FlashIroncladagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, SirionJuroChangedagainst: Agiloft, Icertis Contract Intelligenceno first choiceZoho Contractsagainst: Agiloft, Ironclad, Sirionno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, Coupa CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SAP Ariba Contracts
Three alternatives
Gatekeeper, Juro, LinkSquaresThree alternatives
Concord, Ironclad, PandaDocSeven alternatives
Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, LinkSquares, SirionFour alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, ContractZen, PandaDocFive alternatives
Contractbook, Ironclad, Juro, LinkSquares, SpotDraftPerplexity SonarJuroPandaDocChangedno first choiceConcord, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, ContractSafe, ContractWorks, ContractZen, Contractbook, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Oneflow, PandaDoc, Sirion
Two alternatives
Ironclad, OneflowThree alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, DocuSign, signNowTwo alternatives
Agiloft, Zoho ContractsGrok 4.1 FastIroncladagainst: Conga CLM, ContractPodAi, DocuSign CLMPandaDocChangedagainst: IroncladIroncladContractZenConga CLM, Ironcladagainst: Conga CLM, ContractWorks, DocuSign CLM, SAP Ariba Contracts, SharePoint
Two alternatives
Concord, JuroTwo alternatives
Concord, DocuSignSix alternatives
Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, LinkSquares, SirionFour alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, OpenCLM, PandaDocThree alternatives
Agiloft, LinkSquares, SirionMistral SmallConcordPandaDocChangedIroncladConcordno first choiceagainst: PandaDocagainst: Agiloft, DocuSign CLM
Two alternatives
Conga CLM, IroncladThree alternatives
Concord, Ironclad, OneflowThree alternatives
Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, SirionTwo alternatives
ContractSafe, Zoho ContractsDeepSeek V4 FlashJuroPandaDocChangedagainst: IroncladIcertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SirionConcord, PandaDocagainst: Agiloft, Google Docs + HelloSign/SignWell, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, CobbleStone, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Zoho Contracts
Four alternatives
Concord, DocuSign CLM, LinkSquares, PandaDocThree alternatives
Concord, DocuSign, JuroSix alternatives
Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Juro, LinkSquares, Zoho ContractsThree alternatives
Bind, ContractSafe, ContractZenSix alternatives
Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, LinkSquares, SpotDraftLlama 4 MaverickJurono first choiceChangedno first choiceConcordno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Conga CLM, OneflowTwo alternatives
Bind, SpotDraftQwen 3.7 FlashJuroPandaDocChangedDocuSign CLMBind LegalIronclad, Juroagainst: DocuSign Contract Insightsagainst: Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence
Two alternatives
Ironclad, PandaDocTwo alternatives
DocuSign, IroncladFour alternatives
Conga CLM, Ironclad, Seal Software, Workday CLMFour alternatives
Agiloft, OpenCLM, PandaDoc, Zoho ContractsFour alternatives
Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, PandaDoc, Thomson Reuters CoCounselKimi K2DocuSign CLMPandaDocChangedagainst: DocuSign CLM, Ironcladno first choiceConcordagainst: Agiloft, ContractPodAi, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence
Three alternatives
Concord, Ironclad, LinkSquaresThree alternatives
Concord, Juro, SpotDraftEight alternatives
Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Juro, LinkSquares, SirionLabsThree alternatives
ContractSafe, ContractZen, PandaDocSix alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, Ironclad, Juro, LinkSquares, SpotDraftGLM 4.7 FlashXJuroPandaDocChangedIroncladContractWorksno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, BoloSign, ContractZen, Ironclad, Juro, SAP Ariba Contracts
Two alternatives
Concord, PandaDocFour alternatives
ContractSafe, GetAccept, Ironclad, JuroSeven alternatives
Agiloft, Conga CLM, ContractPodAi, GEP, Juro, LinkSquares, SirionFour alternatives
Concord, DocuSign CLM, PandaDoc, Zoho ContractsMiniMax M2.5Concord, Ironclad, JuroDocuSign CLM, PandaDocChangedagainst: Ironcladno first choiceBind, Zoho Contractsno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
DocuSign CLM, PandaDocOne alternative
ConcordFour alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, GetAccept, PandaDocGPT-6 LunaJuroIroncladChangedIroncladZoho Contractsno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, SAP Ariba Contracts, Sirion
Three alternatives
Ironclad, LinkSquares, SpotDraftTwo alternatives
DocuSign CLM, PandaDocSix alternatives
Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Sirion, Workday Contract IntelligenceTwo alternatives
Concord, PandaDocMuse Glimmer 30BIroncladConcord, Oneflow, PandaDocChangedagainst: DocuSign CLMIcertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladConcordno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, BoloSign, Concord, Conga CLM, Ironclad
Two alternatives
Agiloft, ConcordTwo alternatives
Agrello, IroncladTwo alternatives
Concord, DocuSign CLMThree alternatives
ContractZen, PandaDoc, TrackadoBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 17 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 14:00 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:39 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:29 | yes | 11 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 22 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 18 | 216 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 4 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 12 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:01 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 14:10 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:35 | yes | 25 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 21 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:15 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 12 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:03 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:53 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:34 | yes | 7 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 24 | 54 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:25 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 24 | 55 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 14:12 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 23 | 53 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 17 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 15 | 58 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 14:10 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:25 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:42 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:13 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:07 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 14 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:35 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:24 | yes | 17 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:28 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:49 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 22 | 181 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 1 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conga read as Conga CLM
Coupa read as Coupa CLM
Icertis read as Icertis Contract Intelligence
SAP Ariba read as SAP Ariba Contracts
Workday read as Workday Contract Intelligence
Workday (Evisort) read as Workday Contract Intelligence
Unresolved, counted raw
Agiloft Contract Management Suite
Ariba Contract Management (SAP)
Bind Legal
Corcentric / Determine
DocuSign Contract Insights
Everlaw
Exari
Google Docs + HelloSign/SignWell
Legistify
Seal Software
Thomson Reuters CoCounsel
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.