Contract lifecycle management and e-signature for small business buyers
Asked as “contract lifecycle management platform”, and as “e-signature and contract management tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43PandaDoc25Concord07Zoho Contracts25others
43% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−9Since September 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.PandaDoc held the lead, −9 points on 47%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc43%Clear leader▼−9Since September 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketPandaDoc23%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Icertis Contract Intelligence21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Icertis Contract Intelligence (22%) replaces Ironclad (22% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →
PandaDoc43%Clear leader▼−9Since September 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketPandaDoc23%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseIcertis Contract Intelligence21%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Icertis Contract Intelligence (22%) replaces Ironclad (22% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01PandaDoc43%2%62endorsed leader▼−9Since September 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 38%
PandaDoc43%2%62endorsed leader▼−9Since September 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 38%02
Concord25%7%42accepted challenger▲+20Since September 2026: 8% → 28%, +20 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 28%
Concord25%7%42accepted challenger▲+20Since September 2026: 8% → 28%, +20 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 28%03
Zoho Contracts7%0%13accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%
Zoho Contracts7%0%13accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%04
ContractSafe5%3%37accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 18% → 6%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 6%
ContractSafe5%3%37accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 18% → 6%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 6%05
Juro4%5%22accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Juro4%5%22accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%06
ContractWorks4%14%14accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
ContractWorks4%14%14accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%07
DocuSign4%30%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
DocuSign4%30%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%08
GetAccept2%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
GetAccept2%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%09
SpotDraft2%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
SpotDraft2%8%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%10
Ironclad2%60%30criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Ironclad2%60%30criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Icertis Contract Intelligence0%88%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Icertis Contract Intelligence0%88%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Agiloft0%73%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Agiloft0%73%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
DocuSign CLM0%71%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
DocuSign CLM0%71%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Contractbook0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Contractbook0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
PandaDoc vs Zoho ContractsPandaDoc vs DocuSign CLMPandaDoc vs DocuSignPandaDoc vs Conga CLMConcord vs JuroConcord vs IroncladConcord vs Zoho ContractsConcord vs DocuSign CLMConcord vs DocuSignConcord vs Conga CLMJuro vs IroncladJuro vs Zoho ContractsJuro vs DocuSign CLMJuro vs DocuSignJuro vs Conga CLMIronclad vs Zoho ContractsIronclad vs DocuSign CLMIronclad vs DocuSignIronclad vs Conga CLMZoho Contracts vs DocuSign CLMZoho Contracts vs DocuSignZoho Contracts vs Conga CLMDocuSign CLM vs DocuSignDocuSign CLM vs Conga CLMDocuSign vs Conga CLM
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01PandaDoc43%
PandaDoc43%02Concord25%
Concord25%03Zoho Contracts7%
Zoho Contracts7%04ContractSafe5%
ContractSafe5%05Juro4%
Juro4%06ContractWorks4%
ContractWorks4%07DocuSign4%
DocuSign4%08GetAccept2%
GetAccept2%09SpotDraft2%
SpotDraft2%10Ironclad2%
Ironclad2%11Contractbook0%
Contractbook0%12Agiloft0%
Agiloft0%13DocuSign CLM0%
DocuSign CLM0%14Icertis Contract Intelligence0%
Icertis Contract Intelligence0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
DocuSign CLM71%
17 of 24 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Enterprise CLM suites** such as **Icertis**, **DocuSign CLM**... typically positioned for larger organizations and can be costly and complex to implement.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Ironclad60%
18 of 30 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“**Lengthy, difficult setup** (months, not weeks), geared toward mid-market/enterprise legal teams... overkill for simple needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Icertis Contract Intelligence88%
15 of 17 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“The main categories to avoid or scrutinize closely are: - **Enterprise CLM suites** such as **Icertis**... can be costly and complex to implement.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Agiloft73%
11 of 15 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Agiloft is an enterprise CLM platform requiring substantial budgets and implementation work. It may not be the best fit for small businesses” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 990 links across 179 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 3 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · ContractSafe39 answers · 47 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Bind37 answers · 78 citations · 11 models
vendor site · PandaDoc35 answers · 59 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Conga34 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Zylo29 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GetAccept27 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 48 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Concord26 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HyperStart24 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Juro23 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 12 models
33 answers · 10 models
29 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best contract lifecycle management platform”, “contract lifecycle management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 43% | 527 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 |
| Concord concord.app | 25% | 89 | 246,000 | 58,369 | 18,445 | ||
| Zoho parent site Zoho Contracts 7% | 7% | 26 | 390 | 8 | |||
| ContractSafe contractsafe.com | 5% | 63 | 1,000 | 7 | 38,687 | $687 | 120 |
| Juro juro.com | 4% | 62 | 2,900 | 536 | 44,442 | $168 | 120 |
| ContractWorks contractworks.com | 4% | 33 | 720 | 3 | 1,720 | 1 | |
| DocuSign docusign.com | 4% | 53 | 1,000,000 | 9,641 | 2,280,470 | $20 | 120 |
| GetAccept getaccept.com | 2% | 189 | 590 | 9 | 15,454 | $4,087 | 14 |
| SpotDraft spotdraft.com | 2% | 38 | 1,300 | 17 | 5,760 | 4 | |
| Bind bindlegal.com | 2% | 13 | 33,100 | 99,561 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com). The first result for “best contract lifecycle management platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which e-signature and contract management tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top contract lifecycle management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a contract lifecycle management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which contract lifecycle management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Concord, PandaDocPandaDocChangedagainst: DocuSignConcordagainst: ContractbookConcord, Zoho Contractsagainst: ContractWorksno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, SAP Ariba Contracts
Five alternatives
Aline, ContractWorks, Ironclad, Juro, Zoho ContractsTwo alternatives
Proposify, Zoho ContractsThree alternatives
ContractSafe, Juro, PandaDocOne alternative
PandaDocGPT-5.4 miniJuro, PandaDocagainst: Conga CLM, DocuSign CLMDocuSignChangedContractWorks, Juroagainst: Conga CLM, Icertis Contract IntelligenceContractWorksagainst: Ironclad, SpotDraftno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, Conga CLM, ContractPodAi, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Sirion
One alternative
SpotDraftTwo alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, PandaDocThree alternatives
DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, LinkSquaresTwo alternatives
CLM 365, ContractSafeGemini 3.5 FlashPandaDocagainst: Agiloft, Icertis Contract IntelligencePandaDocHeldagainst: DocuSignno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract IntelligenceZoho Contractsagainst: DocuSign CLM, IroncladContractSafe, ContractWorksagainst: Conga CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Sirionagainst: Agiloft, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Sirion
Three alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, JuroFive alternatives
Dropbox Sign, HubSpot, Juro, SignWell, Zoho ContractsFive alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, Juro, PandaDoc, StackpackThree alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, PandaDocSix alternatives
Contractbook, Hyperstart CLM, Ironclad, Juro, PandaDoc, SpotDraftPerplexity SonarPandaDocPandaDocHeldContractSafe, PandaDocBind, Concordno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, ContractSafe, ContractWorks, ContractZen, Contractbook, Coupa CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Oneflow, PandaDoc, SAP Ariba Contracts, Workday CLM
Three alternatives
ContractSafe, Contractbook, JuroTwo alternatives
Dropbox Sign, SignWellThree alternatives
Concord, ContractWorks, ContractbookOne alternative
PandaDocGrok 4.1 FastPandaDocPandaDocHeldagainst: Adobe Acrobat Sign, DocuSignPandaDocagainst: DocuSign CLM, IroncladContractZenno first choiceagainst: ContractPodAi, Coupa CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Sirion
Three alternatives
Concord, DocuSign CLM, SpotDraftOne alternative
Dropbox SignTwo alternatives
Concord, ContractSafeFour alternatives
Bind, Concord, ContractSafe, PandaDocMistral SmallConcordno first choiceChangedContractSafeZoho Contractsno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad
Three alternatives
ContractSafe, GetAccept, PandaDocThree alternatives
Contractbook, GetAccept, PandaDocThree alternatives
ContractSafe, GetAccept, PandaDocDeepSeek V4 FlashPandaDocagainst: ContractbookPandaDocHeldagainst: DocuSignConcord, PandaDocPandaDocConcordagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Sirionagainst: Agiloft, Concord, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SirionLabs
Three alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, SpotDraftOne alternative
Dropbox SignFour alternatives
Agiloft, ContractSafe, Contractbook, JuroTwo alternatives
Concord, ContractSafeThree alternatives
Bind, ContractSafe, PandaDocLlama 4 MaverickConcord, ContractSafe, GetAccept, PandaDocno first choiceChangedno first choiceConcordno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Bind, ContractSafe, GetAccept, PandaDoc, Zoho ContractsQwen 3.7 FlashConcordPandaDocChangedConcordPandaDocagainst: Concord, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad
Three alternatives
GetAccept, Lark, PandaDocTwo alternatives
DocuSign, Dropbox SignFour alternatives
ContractSafe, Contractbook, GetAccept, PandaDocTwo alternatives
ContractZen, Dropbox SignKimi K2ConcordPandaDocChangedagainst: DocuSignConcordConcord, ContractSafeagainst: Ironclad, JuroConcord, Ironclad, Juro, SpotDraftagainst: Oracle, SAP Ariba Contractsagainst: Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Sirion
Two alternatives
Workday CLM, Zoho ContractsOne alternative
signNowFive alternatives
ContractWorks, Contractbook, Juro, PandaDoc, SpotDraftTwo alternatives
ContractWorks, PandaDocGLM 4.7 FlashXConcordPandaDocChangedagainst: ConcordPandaDocPandaDocno first choiceagainst: DocuSign CLM, Sirion CLM
Four alternatives
Agiloft, Contractbook, Juro, PandaDocTwo alternatives
DocuSign, Dropbox SignSix alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, ContractWorks, DocuSign CLM, Proposify, Zoho ContractsTwo alternatives
Concord, ContractZenMiniMax M2.5Concordagainst: Conga CLMDocuSign, PandaDocChangedPandaDocno first choiceConcordagainst: Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad
Two alternatives
Ironclad, Workday CLMOne alternative
Dropbox SignFour alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, Contractbook, SignWellTwo alternatives
Ironclad, Workday CLMGPT-6 LunaPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocZoho Contractsno first choiceagainst: Agiloft, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad
One alternative
JuroOne alternative
DocuSignFour alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, Juro, SpotDraftOne alternative
PandaDocMuse Glimmer 30BPandaDocPandaDocHeldagainst: DocuSignConcord, ContractbookPandaDocno first choiceagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SAP Ariba Contracts
Three alternatives
Concord, ContractWorks, JuroOne alternative
Dropbox SignThree alternatives
Bind, PandaDoc, Zoho ContractsSix alternatives
Concord, ContractSafe, ContractWorks, ContractZen, Contractbook, Zoho ContractsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 14:13 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:17 | yes | 16 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 17 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:08 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 21 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:55 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 11 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:57 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:42 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 16 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:27 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:05 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:11 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 16 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 8 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:09 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:49 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:55 | yes | 22 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 8 | 51 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:30 | yes | 15 | 62 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:53 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:19 | yes | 15 | 61 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 14 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:18 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:15 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:24 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:35 | yes | 12 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:59 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 19 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:13 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:50 | yes | 9 | 93 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:08 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 7 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:27 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:12 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 22 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:59 | yes | 21 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 4 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conga read as Conga CLM
Coupa read as Coupa CLM
Icertis read as Icertis Contract Intelligence
SAP Ariba read as SAP Ariba Contracts
Unresolved, counted raw
Aline
DocuSign E-Signature
DocuSign Personal
DropboxSign
Google Docs + HelloSign free tier
Hyperstart CLM
Onit
Opstream
Oracle
Qliff
Signaturely
Stackpack
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.