AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Revenue operations › Territory planning › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Territory and quota planning for enterprise buyers

Asked as “sales territory and quota planning tool”, and as “sales performance management platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Varicent Territory and Quota Planning 29%
32Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning29Varicent Territory and Quota Planning05CaptivateIQ Planning34others

32% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning (35%) replaces Varicent Territory and Quota Planning (39% then, 25% now), 10 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning leads at 35%, replacing Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, which led at 39% and stands at 25% now: 10 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning32%19%59endorsed leader▲+1Since September 2026: 33% → 35%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.33% → 35%
02Varicent Territory and Quota Planning29%14%50accepted challenger▼−14Since September 2026: 39% → 25%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.39% → 25%
03CaptivateIQ Planning5%14%37accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
04Xactly5%18%38accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
05Salesforce Sales Planning3%17%18accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 2%
06Salesforce Maps3%50%18criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
07Fullcast2%11%27accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09eSpatial0%40%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
08Workday Adaptive Planning0%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning32%
02Varicent Territory and Quota Planning29%
03CaptivateIQ Planning5%
04Xactly5%
05Salesforce Sales Planning3%
06Salesforce Maps3%
07Fullcast2%
08Workday Adaptive Planning0%
09eSpatial0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
19%
11 of 59 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid: Anaplan and Xactly if cost predictability is critical.” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Salesforce Maps
50%
9 of 18 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Salesforce Maps adds geographic visualization but is positioned as a mapping/visualization layer rather than a full connected quota planning platform” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Xactly
18%
7 of 38 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid: Anaplan and Xactly if cost predictability is critical.” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Spreadsheets
100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“**Spreadsheets as the main planning system**: ... spreadsheet-based territory planning creates significant risk and often produces unbalanced territories” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

81 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1101 links across 182 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 14 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · CaptivateIQ58 answers · 104 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Guideflow53 answers · 100 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ZoomInfo50 answers · 65 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Varicent46 answers · 80 citations · 14 models
31 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
23 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Anaplan21 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Spotio20 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
19 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Prospeo18 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 25 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sales territory and quota planning tool”, “sales territory and quota planning tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning anaplan.com32%132078,17931
Varicent SPM varicent.com
Varicent Territory and Quota Planning 29%, Varicent SPM 2%
31%943,584246
Salesforce parent site
Salesforce Sales Planning 3%, Salesforce Sales Cloud 3%, Salesforce Maps 3%
10%275550,00060,632
CaptivateIQ Planning captivateiq.com5%11410017,85431
Xactly xactlycorp.com5%845,40013525,61923
SAP Territory and Quota3%135,00074,309
Fullcast fullcast.com2%766,600423,5846
Oracle parent site
Oracle Sales Performance Management 2%, Oracle Sales Planning 0%
2%18450,00066,611
Maptive maptive.com2%412,40011462,9067
QuotaPath quotapath.com2%1781,600521,168$1,54634

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 14 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (guideflow.com, prospeo.io, varicent.com). The first result for “best sales territory and quota planning tool” is visdum.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best sales territory and quota planning tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which sales performance management platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade territory and quota planning tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best sales territory and quota planning tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a sales territory and quota planning tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which territory and quota planning tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Five alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast, SAP Territory and Quota, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningChanged
Three alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Salesforce Sales Cloud, Xactly
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Five alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast, SAP Territory and Quota, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
QuotaPath
One alternativeAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning
against: Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
no first choiceagainst: CaptivateIQ Planning, Salesforce Maps, Spreadsheets, Workday Adaptive Planning, eSpatial
GPT-5.4 miniAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Two alternativesOracle Sales Performance Management, Xactly Sales Planning
Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningChanged
Two alternativesSAP Sales Performance Management, Xactly
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Two alternativesSalesforce Sales Planning, Xactly
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
One alternativeXactly
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Five alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast, Salesforce Sales Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningChanged
Four alternativesAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Oracle Sales Performance Management, SAP Commissions, Xactly
against: CaptivateIQ Planning
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Seven alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast, SAP Territory and Quota, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Fintastic
Two alternativesSalesforce Sales Planning, TerraMap
against: Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Three alternativesFullcast, Pigment, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
against: CallidusCloud, CaptivateIQ Planning, Geopointe, HubSpot native territory tools, IBM Cognos, Map My Customers, Qobra, QuotaPath, SAP Commissions, Salesforce Sales Planning, Visdum, eSpatial, legacy Oracle SPM
Perplexity SonarAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, CaptivateIQ Planning
One alternativeVaricent Territory and Quota Planning
Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningChanged
Three alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Everstage, Salesforce Spiff
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Six alternativesClari Align, Esri ArcGIS Business Analyst, Oracle Sales Planning Cloud, Salesforce Maps, Vena, eSpatial
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Two alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
no first choiceagainst: Plotly Dash Enterprise, Spreadsheets
Grok 4.1 FastAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Three alternativesFullcast, Salesforce Revenue Intelligence, Xactly
Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningChanged
Four alternativesAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, SAP Commissions, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Xactly Incent
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Four alternativesFullcast, Optymyze, Oracle Sales Performance Management, Xactly
against: EasyTerritory, eSpatial
Maptive
One alternativeCaptivateIQ Planning
against: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Fullcast, Pigment, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Five alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast, QuotaPath, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly Align
against: CaptivateIQ Planning, EasyTerritory, Oracle Sales Performance Management, SalesRabbit, Salesforce Maps
Mistral SmallSAP Territory and Quota
Two alternativesEnable, Pipeline (ZoomInfo) Territory and Quota Planning
Salesforce Sales CloudChanged
Two alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Salesforce Sales Planning
Three alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Clari Copilot, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning
Two alternativesAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Fullcast
no first choiceagainst: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Salesforce Maps, Spreadsheets, Xactly, Xactly AlignStar
DeepSeek V4 FlashAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Two alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningChanged
Three alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, SAP Commissions, Xactly
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Five alternativesEasyTerritory, SAP Sales Territory and Quota, Salesforce Sales Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
CaptivateIQ Planning
Two alternativesXactly AlignStar, eSpatial
against: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Fullcast, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Fullcast, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
One alternativeCaptivateIQ Planning
against: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Salesforce Maps, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Llama 4 MaverickSAP Territory and Quota
Two alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Guideflow
Salesforce Sales CloudChanged
Three alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
no first choiceAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Oracle Sales Performance Management
One alternativeCaptivateIQ Planning
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Three alternativesSalesforce Sales Cloud, Spotio, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
against: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Qwen 3.7 FlashAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Three alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast, eSpatial
XactlyChanged
Two alternativesForma.ai, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, CaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast
Four alternativesPigment, SAP Territory and Quota, Workday Adaptive Planning, eSpatial
Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
One alternativeOracle Sales Performance Management
against: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
no first choiceagainst: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, SAP Commissions, Spreadsheets, Standalone Lead Routing Tools, Xactly
Kimi K2Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Two alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Xactly
XactlyChanged
Two alternativesSAP Commissions, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, CaptivateIQ Planning
Four alternativesFullcast, SAP Territory and Quota Management, Workday Adaptive Planning, Xactly
against: Salesforce Enterprise Territory Management
Salesforce Sales Performance Management Suite
One alternativeQuotaPath
against: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Varicent SPM
Two alternativesAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Xactly
against: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Salesforce Maps, Spreadsheets, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
GLM 4.7 FlashXAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Three alternativesFullcast, Salesforce Maps, Workday Adaptive Planning
Xactly IncentiveChanged
Three alternativesAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, beqom
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Ten alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Fullcast, Maptive, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales – Territory Management, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Territory Management, Spotio, Workday Adaptive Planning, ZoomInfo, eSpatial
against: HubSpot Sales – Territory & Quota Management
Salesforce Maps
One alternativeAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning
against: Maptive, eSpatial
no first choiceagainst: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Badger Maps, Basic Salesforce Maps add‑on, CaptivateIQ Planning, Clari Copilot, Fullcast, MapInfo, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales – Territory Management, Oracle CX Sales Territory Management, SalesRabbit, Salesforce Enterprise Territory Management, Simple SAP Territory & Quota, Workday Adaptive Planning, Xactly AlignStar, eSpatial
MiniMax M2.5Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Five alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, G2 – Sales Planning, Guideflow, SAP Territory and Quota, ZoomInfo (Pipeline) – Territory & Quota Planning
CaptivateIQ Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningChanged
Two alternativesAnaplan SPM, Salesforce Sales Cloud
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Two alternativesVaricent Territory and Quota Planning, Vena
against: EasyTerritory
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Two alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Salesforce Sales Planning
against: Maptive, QuotaPath
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaVaricent Territory and Quota Planning
Three alternativesAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Salesforce Sales Planning, Xactly
Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningHeld
Two alternativesAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Xactly
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Four alternativesFullcast, Oracle Sales Planning, Pigment, Salesforce Sales Planning
Salesforce Sales Planning
One alternativeVaricent Territory and Quota Planning
no first choice
One alternativeSalesforce\u2019s Territory Planning
against: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Salesforce Maps, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Xactly
Muse Glimmer 30BVaricent Territory and Quota Planning
Three alternativesAnaplan for Sales, Oracle Sales Performance Management, Oracle Sales Planning
Varicent Territory and Quota PlanningHeld
Two alternativesObero SPM, Xactly
Anaplan – Sales Territory & Quota Planning
Four alternativesFullcast, SAP Territory and Quota, Salesforce Sales Planning, Varicent – Sales Performance Management
against: EasyTerritory
Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Four alternativesCaptivateIQ Planning, Lative, Varicent Territory and Quota Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
LINEN Cloud Territory Management
Five alternativesAnaplan Territory & Quota Planning, SAP SPM, Salesforce Territory Management, TerraMap, Vena
against: Salesforce Maps
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:07yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:26yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:31yes1926 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:13yes203 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:54yes218 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:33yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:49yes2025 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:56yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:29yes528 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:18yes1425 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:07yes1740 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:49yes654 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:26yes414 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:46yes2325 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:33yes1710 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:30yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:07yes1625 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:00yes173 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:47yes239 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:23yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:35yes2032 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:25yes51 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:10yes1968 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:57yes1835 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:33yes16227 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:57yes821 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:37yes319 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 07:58yes1220 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:54yes1311 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:20yes510 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:55yes1029 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:51yes194 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:34yes209 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:26yes89 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:48yes2340 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:29yes51 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:36yes743 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:00yes1934 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:51yes1962 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:39yes2032 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:45yes720 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:01yes1436 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:59yes1811 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:54yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:40yes1239 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:59yes203 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:44yes229 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:53yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:35yes2333 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:18yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:32yes1377 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 14:04yes2438 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:13yes1961 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:19yes1750 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:26yes423 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:15yes1638 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:03yes1813 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 13:23yes57 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:32yes2223 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:25yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:31yes188 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:04no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:48yes2138 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:44yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:57no036 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:15yes2426 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:08yes1385 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:54no054 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:11yes220 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:38yes1528 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:06yes1711 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:41yes36 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:23yes1927 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:52yes204 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:11yes167 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:39yes106 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:55yes2349 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:50yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:32yes853 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:12yes2232 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:20yes13248 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:27yes1855 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:19yes421 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:17yes1630 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Anaplan read as Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Anaplan (Connected Planning) read as Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning
Captivate IQ read as CaptivateIQ Planning
CaptivateIQ read as CaptivateIQ Planning
Oracle read as Oracle Sales Planning
Oracle SPM read as Oracle Sales Performance Management
SAP read as SAP Commissions
SAP SuccessFactors Territory and Quota read as SAP Territory and Quota
SAP Territory & Quota (part of SAP Sales Cloud) read as SAP Territory and Quota
Salesforce read as Salesforce Maps
Salesforce (Sales Planning and Territory Planning) read as Salesforce Maps
Salesforce Territory Planning / Maps read as Salesforce Maps
Varicent read as Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Varicent (IBM) read as Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Varicent Sales Planning read as Varicent Territory and Quota Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Agentforce Sales (Salesforce Sales Cloud)
Anaplan SPM
Anaplan – Sales Territory & Quota Planning
ArticSledge
Basic Salesforce Maps add‑on
Enterprise Territory Management
Esri ArcGIS Business Analyst
Fintastic
G2 – Sales Planning (platform)
HubSpot Sales – Territory & Quota Management
HubSpot native territory tools
LINEN Cloud Territory Management
MapInfo
Obero SPM
Oracle CX Sales Territory Management
Oracle Sales Planning Cloud
Pipeline (ZoomInfo) Territory and Quota Planning
SAP SPM
SAP Sales Territory and Quota
SAP Territory and Quota Management
Salesforce Sales Performance Management Suite
Salesforce\u2019s Territory Planning
Simple SAP Territory & Quota
Standalone Lead Routing Tools
Varicent SPM
Varicent Sales Planning, Territory & Quota, and Quota Management
Varicent – Sales Performance Management
Xactly Align
Xactly Incentive
ZoomInfo (Pipeline) – Territory & Quota Planning
legacy Oracle SPM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← CommissionsAddress verification →