Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 104 → 89 of 94
Oracle · 2 categories · Named, not rankedOracle Sales Performance Management
18Judge labels
2First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Sales Performance Management was named 7 times in Territory planning and 1 other category, where CaptivateIQ Planning led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business98 of 103
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market26 of 123
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise10 of 92
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Sales Performance Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 2% | 26 of 123 | 67% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales commissions and incentive compensation | Revenue operations | 0% | 25 of 47 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Sales Performance Management held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Territory planning · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 88 → 25 of 116
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 48 → 10 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Territory planning | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 88 → 26 of 123 |
| Commissions | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 25 of 47 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Sales Performance Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Sales Performance Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“tools like Anaplan, Oracle SPM, or dedicated sales planning platforms that can scale with your organization” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Territory planning · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Oracle Sales Performance Management if you already run on Oracle” GPT-5.4 mini · Commissions · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Oracle SPM if you're already invested in Oracle's ecosystem” GPT-5.4 mini · Territory planning · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid high-cost, enterprise-focused platforms like Anaplan, Varicent, Xactly, and Oracle SPM” Mistral Small · Territory planning · negative prompt · hard negative
“older Xactly or Oracle SPM without modern checks): Reviews note integration brittleness with CRMs” Grok 4.20 · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“Legacy "Heavyweight" SPM Suites (e.g., Xactly, Varicent, Oracle SPM)... extreme complexity” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative
“Varicent / Xactly / Oracle SPM — Full sales-performance suites costing $50K–$100K+/year” Muse Glimmer 30B · Territory planning · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Sales Performance Management, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Sales Performance Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Sales Performance Management, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Sales Performance Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Sales Performance Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named Oracle Sales Performance Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
captivateiq.com13
learn.g2.com11
guideflow.com10
varicent.com9
pipeline.zoominfo.com8
g2.com7
articsledge.com6
prospeo.io6
worldmetrics.org6
qobra.co5
Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Oracle Sales Performance Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Oracle Sales Performance Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Sales Performance Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle SPM 6
Follow Oracle Sales Performance Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle Corporation is the company behind Oracle Sales Performance Management.ShowHide
The company
Oracle Corporation is the company behind Oracle Sales Performance Management.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- oracle.com
- Headquarters
- Bengaluru, India
- Founded
- 1977
- Employees
- about 162,000 (2025)
- Ownership
- Public, ORCL on Nasdaq
- Also from Oracle
- Oracle ATG, Oracle Analytics, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Oracle BI, Oracle BlueKai, Oracle CDX, Oracle CPQ, Oracle CRM and 46 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Oracle Sales Performance Management offers advanced tools for incentive compensation, quota management, and territory management. Fueled by a strong data foundation and machine learning, the solution helps you increase revenue by aligning individual sales goals with your company’s sales strategy.
- For
- sales managers and sales operations staff
- Customers named
- TriNet
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Oracle Sales Performance Management's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: oracle.com/cx/sales/sales-performance-management, oracle.com/ae/performance-management/planning, oracle.com/apac/performance-management/planning, oracle.com/ae/cx/sales/sales-performance-management, oracle.com/apac/cx/sales/sales-performance-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Sales Performance Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Sales Performance Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Sales Performance Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Sales Performance Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Sales Performance Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.