GTM AI Index
September 2026 Edition, expanded tier · The six flagship models on every category, as published September 9, 2026. The public index runs on the standard tier; this record is what the Expanded Edition Pack delivers on one category. The category page →
Index Sales September 2026 Edition

Sales enablement and content

Asked as “sales enablement platform”, and as “sales content management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B software company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, six models each.
Standing
Contested
19% of first choices, contested.

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all six models, for a mid-market B2B software company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Dock19%0%28accepted challenger
02HubSpot Sales Hub19%7%30accepted challenger
03Paperflite12%0%10accepted challenger
04Showpad8%33%43criticized challenger
05Highspot8%49%55criticized challenger
06Seismic8%59%51criticized challenger
07MindTickle4%21%39accepted challenger
08SalesHood4%0%19accepted challenger
09Spekit2%3%29accepted challenger
10Allego2%10%31accepted challenger
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Bigtincan0%50%12criticized challenger
11Gong0%36%22criticized challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Dock19%
02HubSpot Sales Hub19%
03Paperflite12%
04Showpad8%
05Highspot8%
06Seismic8%
07MindTickle4%
08SalesHood4%
09Spekit2%
10Allego2%
11Gong0%
12Bigtincan0%

02What they warned about

A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Highspot
49%
27 of 55 labels negative · 12 of 6 models · 14 hard negative
“Avoid signing new multi-year contracts with Highspot, Seismic, Showpad, or Brainshark until post-integration roadmaps are clear” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Seismic
59%
30 of 51 labels negative · 12 of 6 models · 14 hard negative
“What I'd Avoid for Mid-Market ... Expensive ($75K+ minimums), heavy implementation, built for large enterprises” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
Showpad
33%
14 of 43 labels negative · 11 of 6 models · 4 hard negative
“**Security concerns**: August 2025 security issue with Drift integration led to widespread data exposure” Mistral Small, negative prompt
MindTickle
21%
8 of 39 labels negative · 6 of 6 models · 4 hard negative
“**Integration limitations**: Lack of native ties to tools beyond Salesforce frustrates teams” Mistral Small, negative prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: four of the six in this edition.

Sites the answers cite

20 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 185 links across 85 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.

vendor site · MindTickle7 answers · 7 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Paperflite6 answers · 7 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Salesmotion6 answers · 7 citations · 2 models
6 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Spekit6 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Highspot5 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Showpad5 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Apollo.io5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · CaptivateIQ5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Dock5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Gartner4 answers · 6 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Allego4 answers · 4 citations · 2 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ModelDirect“What is the best sales enablement platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which sales content management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top sales enablement platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best sales enablement platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a sales enablement platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which sales enablement platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Opus 5no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Claude Opus 4.8no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-6 Astrano first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-5.6 Solno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.1 Prono first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Perplexity Sonar Prono first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Zero rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Sales Hub
Salesforce read as Salesforce Sales Programs
Unresolved, counted raw
HubSpot Sales/Content Hub
LetterAI
Microsoft-centered options
Pitch.com
Saba Cloud (formerly Lessonly)
Sales Enablement Collective
Salesforce / Agentforce Sales
Salesforce Sales Enablement
Seismic-Highspot
ServiceAgent
Showpad-Bigtincan
Spekit®
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← DialersSales engagement →