GTM AI Index
September 2026 Edition, expanded tier · The six flagship models on every category, as published September 9, 2026. The public index runs on the standard tier; this record is what the Expanded Edition Pack delivers on one category. The category page →
Index Sales September 2026 Edition

Digital sales rooms

Asked as “digital sales room platform”, and as “buyer engagement and deal room tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B software company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, six models each.
Standing
Contested
40% of first choices, contested.

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all six models, for a mid-market B2B software company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Aligned40%8%50endorsed leader
02Trumpet25%15%55accepted challenger
03GetAccept8%20%49accepted challenger
04HummingDeck8%0%17accepted challenger
05Flowla6%9%35accepted challenger
06Dock6%20%45accepted challenger
07Showpad2%20%10accepted challenger
08Seismic2%36%25criticized challenger
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Recapped0%50%10criticized challenger
13Highspot0%37%27criticized challenger
12MindTickle0%25%16criticized challenger
09DealHub0%22%32accepted challenger
11Allego0%17%18accepted challenger
10Accord0%12%16accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Aligned40%
02Trumpet25%
03GetAccept8%
04HummingDeck8%
05Flowla6%
06Dock6%
07Showpad2%
08Seismic2%
09DealHub0%
10Accord0%
11Allego0%
12MindTickle0%
13Highspot0%
14Recapped0%

02What they warned about

A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
GetAccept
20%
10 of 49 labels negative · 8 of 6 models · 5 hard negative
“Trustpilot Rating: 1.7/5 (marked as "Bad")... Platform filled with bugs and usability problems” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Trumpet
15%
8 of 55 labels negative · 8 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“Issues with customization limits... CRM synchronization and content-governance gaps reported” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Highspot
37%
10 of 27 labels negative · 7 of 6 models · 6 hard negative
“**Avoid** platforms like **Dock**, **GetAccept**, or **Highspot** for a limited budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
DealHub
22%
7 of 32 labels negative · 7 of 6 models · 4 hard negative
“If you don't need a full CPQ platform and just want digital sales rooms, this is overkill and potentially problematic. The opaque pricing alone is a major red flag.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: four of the six in this edition.

Sites the answers cite

23 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 202 links across 66 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.

vendor site · Showpad10 answers · 11 citations · 3 models
vendor site · GetAccept10 answers · 10 citations · 2 models
vendor site · MindTickle9 answers · 9 citations · 2 models
8 answers · 13 citations · 2 models
8 answers · 12 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Dock8 answers · 11 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Allego6 answers · 9 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Gartner6 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · HummingDeck6 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
4 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Guideflow4 answers · 6 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Flowla4 answers · 5 citations · 2 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ModelDirect“What is the best digital sales room platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which buyer engagement and deal room tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top digital sales room platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital sales room platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a digital sales room platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital sales room platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Opus 5no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Claude Opus 4.8no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-6 Astrano first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-5.6 Solno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.1 Prono first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Perplexity Sonar Prono first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Zero rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency

Noise floor in this category

Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings
None. Every name in this category resolved on its own.
Unresolved, counted raw
Ansarada
ConnectWise Sell
DataRoom
EnableUs
Firmex
Intralinks
Send.co
Smart Rooms
iCloud / Wetransfer / WeUpload
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Conversation intelLead routing →