Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
“Trustpilot Rating: 1.7/5 (marked as "Bad")... Platform filled with bugs and usability problems” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
“Issues with customization limits... CRM synchronization and content-governance gaps reported” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
“**Avoid** platforms like **Dock**, **GetAccept**, or **Highspot** for a limited budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
“If you don't need a full CPQ platform and just want digital sales rooms, this is overkill and potentially problematic. The opaque pricing alone is a major red flag.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
23 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 202 links across 66 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|
Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.