GTM AI Index
September 2026 Edition, expanded tier · The six flagship models on every category, as published September 9, 2026. The public index runs on the standard tier; this record is what the Expanded Edition Pack delivers on one category. The category page →
Index Sales September 2026 Edition

Meeting scheduling

Asked as “meeting scheduling tool for sales teams”, and as “appointment scheduling software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B software company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, six models each.
Standing
Clear leader
59% of first choices, clear leader.

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all six models, for a mid-market B2B software company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Calendly59%13%60endorsed leader
02HubSpot Meetings14%7%44accepted challenger
03Chili Piper12%21%34accepted challenger
04Cal.com4%0%36accepted challenger
05RevenueHero4%0%12accepted challenger
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Doodle0%30%20criticized challenger
08Microsoft Bookings0%29%14criticized challenger
07Acuity Scheduling0%21%14accepted challenger
06SavvyCal0%5%20accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

One product takes 59% of first choices here, so the chart would put eight markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category. Jump to the standing

02What they warned about

A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Calendly
13%
8 of 60 labels negative · 8 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“Calendly (Medium-High Concern) ... Extensive data sharing ... Not HIPAA compliant” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Doodle
30%
6 of 20 labels negative · 6 of 6 models · 4 hard negative
“High Caution — Privacy & Security Concerns ... one of the most concerning tools from a privacy standpoint” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Chili Piper
21%
7 of 34 labels negative · 5 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid These for Mid-Market - **Chili Piper:** Now starts at $15,000/year minimum ... overkill for most mid-sized companies” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
Microsoft Bookings
29%
4 of 14 labels negative · 4 of 6 models · 1 hard negative
“it has notable vulnerabilities: Input validation flaws ... allows HTML injection” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: four of the six in this edition.

Sites the answers cite

18 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 147 links across 65 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.

vendor site · Calendly7 answers · 11 citations · 3 models
7 answers · 8 citations · 2 models
vendor site · HubSpot6 answers · 20 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Albato5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Cal.com4 answers · 5 citations · 1 model
vendor site · Guideflow4 answers · 5 citations · 2 models
vendor site · MarketBetter4 answers · 4 citations · 2 models
3 answers · 3 citations · 1 model
vendor site · Doodle3 answers · 3 citations · 1 model
vendor site · Lunacal3 answers · 3 citations · 2 models
vendor site · RevenueHero3 answers · 3 citations · 1 model
3 answers · 3 citations · 1 model

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ModelDirect“What is the best meeting scheduling tool for sales teams for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which appointment scheduling software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top meeting scheduling tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best meeting scheduling tool for sales teams for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a meeting scheduling tool for sales teams. What should we look at?”Negative“Which meeting scheduling tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Opus 5no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Claude Opus 4.8no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-6 Astrano first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-5.6 Solno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.1 Prono first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Perplexity Sonar Prono first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Zero rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Meetings
Unresolved, counted raw
Appointlet
Assistant.to
Bookafy
Bookings/Appointments
Cal Clear
Cal ID
Cal.com with self-hosting
Calendar
CalendarHero
Drift/Salesloft scheduling
Google Calendar + Gmail
Google Calendar / Google Appointment Scheduler
Google Calendar appointment booking
LettuceMeet
Lever
Proton Calendar
Reclaim AI
Salesforce Events
Salesforce native options
ScheduleOnce
Sidekick
Standard and Teams by Lunacal
TimeTap
Topmate / Scheduling.link
Xembly
Zoho
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Lead routingRevenue intel →