GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Mediafly · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Mediafly

29Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Sales enablement for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 81 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sales enablement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mediafly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Sales enablement and contentSales0%17 of 810%8under 10 labels · led by Dock at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mediafly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mediafly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mediafly - Best for mid-market to enterprise teams, with custom pricing, value selling and ROI tools” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Primary Strength: Value selling and revenue intelligence” Mistral Small · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · alternative
“Mediafly: The Specialist in Value Selling & ROI Assessment” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · alternative
“Mediafly if you need value selling and ROI tools” Perplexity Sonar · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mediafly, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mediafly was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Showpad22 of 290Not in the top three
Seismic20 of 2911Not in the top three
Highspot19 of 297Not in the top three
MindTickle18 of 293Not in the top three
Allego14 of 290Not in the top three
SalesHood10 of 290Not in the top three
Dock9 of 293Not in the top three
Gong7 of 290Not in the top three
Pitcher7 of 290Not in the top three
Spekit7 of 290Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mediafly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 29 answers that named Mediafly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

showpad.com8
highspot.com5
dock.us4
gartner.com3
seismic.com3
apollo.io2
bigtincan.com2
captivateiq.com2
federicopresicci.com2
mindtickle.com2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Mediafly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Mediafly.
Website
mediafly.com
Headquarters
Chicago, United States
Founded
2006

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mediafly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mediafly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mediafly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack