| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 17 of 116 | 7% | 27 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Prioritize tools like Cuvama, Minoa, or Symbe (if you can handle the curve) for strong ROI/business case builders, but pilot first.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Value selling · negative prompt · first choice
“For AI-driven discovery: Cuvama” MiniMax M2.5 · Value selling · comparative prompt · first choice
“Methodology-native Salesforce integration; embeds your framework from discovery to renewal. Highest-rated methodology tool on G2 (4.9/5).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Value selling · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for Salesforce-Native Teams ... Consideration: Smaller footprint and a real change-management shift to implement well.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Full-scale value management suites (e.g., *Ecosystems*, *Cuvama*)... these platforms often introduce so much administrative overhead” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Real change-management shift" as one G2 reviewer noted for Cuvama” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 63 answers that named Cuvama and are not a share of its labels.
280 of the 280 domain citations in answers naming Cuvama came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 59 | 5 | 2026-08-31 | CRM | |
| News or press | 14 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 11 | 2026-08-31 | Value selling | |
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2024-04-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2024-05-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2022-07-08 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-19 |
Every page cuvama.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cuvama's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cuvama, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cuvama by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: