Index › Products › DecisionLink · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

DecisionLink

16Judge labels

1First choices

8Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. DecisionLink was named 7 times in Value selling, where Minoa led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business130 of 130

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprise26 of 97

under the label threshold

In value selling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DecisionLink for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Value selling tools	Sales	2%	12 of 116	29%	7	under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DecisionLink yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DecisionLink across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A very mature, robust enterprise platform focused on automating the creation of value assets at scale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Value selling · scale prompt · first choice

“DecisionLink and Mediafly offer the broadest enterprise coverage for post-sale value tracking” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Value selling · comparative prompt · alternative

“DecisionLink (Value realization focus)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Value selling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“not recommended for mid-sized companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“usually out of reach, as they often require five-figure annual contracts and extensive implementation times” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Value selling · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DecisionLink, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DecisionLink was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ValueCore9 of 160Not among the top eight

Minoa8 of 162Not among the top eight

Mediafly8 of 160Not among the top eight

Symbe7 of 162Not among the top eight

The ROI Shop7 of 162Not among the top eight

Mediafly Value7 of 161Not among the top eight

Ecosystems6 of 162Not among the top eight

Cuvama6 of 160Not among the top eight

Xfactor.io5 of 160Not among the top eight

Outgrow4 of 161Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DecisionLink. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named DecisionLink and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com11

gartner.com9

guideflow.com9

valuevisualizer.com9

minoa.io8

roi-selling.com7

theroishop.com7

enablism.com6

slashdot.org6

valuenova.ai6

No domain is on file for DecisionLink, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/value-selling9

guideflow.com/blog/value-selling-tools9

valuevisualizer.com/articles/best-value-selling-tools9

theroishop.com/blogs/roi-software-comparison7

g2.com/discussions/which-value-selling-tools-provide-the-strongest-roi-calculator-and-busi6

valuenova.ai/resources/articles/value-selling-software-comparison-20256

g2.com/categories/value-selling-tools5

roi-selling.com/5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as DecisionLink

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DecisionLink; a claim can dispute any of them.

DecisionLink (ValueCloud) 2DecisionLink (ValueCloud®) 1

Follow DecisionLink

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DecisionLink's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DecisionLink, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DecisionLink by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where DecisionLink is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name DecisionLink, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.