Every category where a model named ValueCore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Value selling tools	Sales	12%	3 of 116	4%	26	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ValueCore yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ValueCore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	1	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	1	1	0	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels1

Paraphrase23 labels8

Comparative20 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative69 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“This is a veteran in ROI modeling... making it a robust choice for mid-sized B2B sales teams that need flexibility and depth in their business cases.” Mistral Small · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend ValueCore (formerly VisualizeROI) as a strong starting point for an ROI calculator and business case platform.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend ValueCore (formerly VisualizeROI) as the strongest first choice” Perplexity Sonar · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“the best *value selling tool* is usually The ROI Shop or ValueCore” Perplexity Sonar · Value selling · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ValueCore: Limited functionality/integrations, non-intuitive backend (hard for live meetings), poor multi-offer support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ValueCore, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ValueCore was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Symbe39 of 6912Compare →

Minoa34 of 695Compare →

The ROI Shop32 of 696Compare →

Mediafly32 of 695Not among the top eight

Cuvama31 of 693Not among the top eight

Ecosystems21 of 693Not among the top eight

Mediafly Value18 of 695Not among the top eight

LeveragePoint11 of 691Compare →

Guideflow9 of 694Not among the top eight

DecisionLink9 of 691Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ValueCore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 69 answers that named ValueCore and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com60

minoa.io49

guideflow.com45

sourceforge.net43

us.fitgap.com27

gartner.com23

mediafly.com19

slashdot.org19

outgrow.co17

prospeo.io16

318 of the 318 domain citations in answers naming ValueCore came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/value-selling-tools44

g2.com/discussions/which-value-selling-tools-provide-the-strongest-roi-calculator-and-busi40

g2.com/categories/value-selling-tools30

gartner.com/reviews/market/value-selling23

sourceforge.net/software/value-selling/integrates-with-salesforce23

minoa.io/resources/blog/automated-roi-measurement-software-compared20

minoa.io/resources/blog/best-sales-roi-calculator-tools-202619

us.fitgap.com/search/value-selling-tools/small-business18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

valuecore.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ValueCore takes 12% of first choices and Minoa takes 21%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “value selling tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best value selling tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 320 a month (“valuecore”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 5,835 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,038 · 19 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 212
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

12%

rank 3 of 116 in value selling

Segment leader

21%

Minoa

First choices: 9 across its categories
Named in: 69 answers
Its own site cited: in 69 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on valuecore.ai

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	39	0	2026-06-02
Glossary or explainer	3	0	2025-10-04
Template or tool	2	0	2022-12-15
Case study	1	0	2022-10-22
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Report or ebook	1	0	2022-10-20
Comparison	1	0	2025-08-26

Most recent

2026-06-02How one cs team pushed their renewal rate from 75 to 89 blog
2026-04-09Pe madness final four recap productivity separates the contenders blog
2026-04-09Pe madness elite 8 recap defense wins deals blog
2026-04-03Pe madness round of 32 recap where value creation gets real blog
2026-04-03Pe madness sweet 16 recap putting up points with revenue and time to market blog
2026-03-18Pe madness blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page valuecore.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as ValueCore

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ValueCore; a claim can dispute any of them.

ValueCore (formerly VisualizeROI) 11

Follow ValueCore

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ValueCore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ValueCore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ValueCore by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ValueCore is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ValueCore, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where ValueCore is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

ValueCore is among the products AI models recommend first in Value selling tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/sales/value-selling-tools/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/valuecore--value-selling-tools-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Value selling tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Value selling tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/sales/value-selling-tools/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/valuecore--value-selling-tools-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Value selling tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Value selling tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/sales/value-selling-tools/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/valuecore--value-selling-tools-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Value selling tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Value selling tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.