1 category · RankedEcosystems
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 18 of 116 | 24% | 17 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Ecosystems across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Collaborative enterprise value management and CFO-grade business cases... highly rated (4.9/5 on G2)” Mistral Small · Value selling · comparative prompt · first choice
“Ecosystems emphasizes deep financial modeling” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Value selling · comparative prompt · first choice
“Strong for collaborative value assessments; good alternatives if buyer co-building is key.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Collaborative customer value management | SaaS platform focused on *joint* value creation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Value selling · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Full-scale value management suites (e.g., *Ecosystems*, *Cuvama*) designed for global enterprises with massive headcounts... Why to Be Cautious” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
“Legacy leader, white-glove services | Opaque, premium, bundled with services | Companies with 10+ dedicated value engineers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Value selling · scale prompt · soft negative
“usually out of reach, as they often require five-figure annual contracts and extensive implementation times” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Value selling · budget prompt · soft negative
“The legacy leader; requires dedicated value engineering team (10+ people)” Kimi K2 · Value selling · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ecosystems, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ecosystems was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 43 answers that named Ecosystems and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
180 of the 180 domain citations in answers naming Ecosystems came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ecosystems.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ecosystems takes 0% of first choices and Minoa takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 135,000 a month (“ecosystems”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 37,365 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 976 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 311 · 31 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 174
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 43 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 43 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 183 | undated | Customer success, Value selling | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 40 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 27 | undated | |||
| Case study | 15 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 10 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ecosystems.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Ecosystems
Follow Ecosystems
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ecosystems's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ecosystems, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ecosystems by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ecosystems is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ecosystems, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.