Index › Products › DecisionLink ValueCloud · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

DecisionLink ValueCloud

8Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. DecisionLink ValueCloud was named 6 times in Value selling, where Minoa led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business87 of 130

under the label threshold

Mid-market31 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprise42 of 97

under the label threshold

In value selling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DecisionLink ValueCloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Value selling tools	Sales	0%	31 of 116	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DecisionLink ValueCloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DecisionLink ValueCloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong for collaborative value assessments; good alternatives if buyer co-building is key.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“good at quantifying business value at any stage of the customer journey” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“buying heavy, expensive platforms like *DecisionLink ValueCloud* or *Mediafly Value360* that require dedicated value engineering teams and months of implementation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Value selling · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DecisionLink ValueCloud, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DecisionLink ValueCloud was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ecosystems8 of 80Not among the top eight

ValueCore7 of 82Not among the top eight

Minoa6 of 82Not among the top eight

Mediafly Value6 of 80Not among the top eight

The ROI Shop4 of 82Not among the top eight

Cuvama4 of 80Not among the top eight

Symbe3 of 81Not among the top eight

Shark Finesse3 of 80Not among the top eight

Distribute.so2 of 81Not among the top eight

HubSpot Sales ROI Calculator2 of 81Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DecisionLink ValueCloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named DecisionLink ValueCloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

minoa.io7

g2.com6

sourceforge.net6

theroishop.com6

guideflow.com5

outgrow.co3

slashdot.org3

thatsgonna.help3

valuevisualizer.com3

capterra.com2

No domain is on file for DecisionLink ValueCloud, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

g2.com/discussions/which-value-selling-tools-provide-the-strongest-roi-calculator-and-busi5

guideflow.com/blog/value-selling-tools5

minoa.io/resources/blog/automated-roi-measurement-software-compared5

theroishop.com/blogs/roi-software-comparison5

minoa.io/resources/blog/best-sales-roi-calculator-tools-20264

outgrow.co/blog/roi-calculator-examples-b2b-saas3

sourceforge.net/software/value-selling3

sourceforge.net/software/value-selling/integrates-with-salesforce3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as DecisionLink ValueCloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DecisionLink ValueCloud; a claim can dispute any of them.

DecisionLink / ValueCloud (by XFactor.io) 1

Follow DecisionLink ValueCloud

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DecisionLink ValueCloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DecisionLink ValueCloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DecisionLink ValueCloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where DecisionLink ValueCloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name DecisionLink ValueCloud, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.