Index › Products › Distribute.so · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Distribute.so

4Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Distribute.so was named 2 times in Value selling, where Minoa led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business21 of 130

under the label threshold

Mid-market106 of 116

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In value selling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Distribute.so for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Value selling tools	Sales	0%	106 of 116	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Distribute.so yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Distribute.so across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Distribute.so/HubSpot as a free proof-of-concept” Muse Glimmer 30B · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“limited to lead-gen calculators, not full value selling” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Value selling · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Distribute.so, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Distribute.so was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Minoa3 of 41Not among the top eight

Ecosystems3 of 40Not among the top eight

HubSpot Sales ROI Calculator3 of 40Not among the top eight

Sandler Visualize ROI3 of 40Not among the top eight

Shark Finesse3 of 40Not among the top eight

ValueCore3 of 40Not among the top eight

DecisionLink ValueCloud2 of 40Not among the top eight

Mediafly Value2 of 40Not among the top eight

The ROI Shop2 of 40Not among the top eight

Digital Apple1 of 41Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Distribute.so. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Distribute.so and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

minoa.io4

g2.com3

guideflow.com3

outgrow.co2

roi-selling.com2

sourceforge.net2

thatsgonna.help2

theroishop.com2

topbusinesssoftware.com2

cdn.prod.website-files.com1

No domain is on file for Distribute.so, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

minoa.io/resources/blog/best-sales-roi-calculator-tools-20264

guideflow.com/blog/value-selling-tools3

g2.com/discussions/which-value-selling-tools-provide-the-strongest-roi-calculator-and-busi2

minoa.io/resources/blog/automated-roi-measurement-software-compared2

outgrow.co/blog/roi-calculator-examples-b2b-saas2

thatsgonna.help/blog/sales-roi-calculators-without-spreadsheets2

cdn.prod.website-files.com/65301b2275706bb71eca1aac/655244b1e6e00fb6468a62b8_VSA%20flyer%21

digitalapple.ai/capabilities/lead-gen/roi1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Distribute.so

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Distribute.so's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Distribute.so, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Distribute.so by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Distribute.so is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Distribute.so, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.