| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value selling tools | Sales | 21% | 1 of 116 | 0% | 27 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-sized B2B teams without a full value-selling team, Minoa gives the best balance of CRM-linked ROI/TCO modeling + AI-assisted case creation” Muse Glimmer 30B · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Minoa if you sell B2B SaaS, want deep CRM integration, and want AI to help your AEs write the business case narrative.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Value selling · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Minoa or The ROI Shop ... if you are selling high-contract-value B2B software/services and need a sales-first tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Value selling · budget prompt · first choice
“Minoa offers the strongest combination of AI-powered value intelligence, reasonable pricing, and enterprise-grade output” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Value selling · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 55 answers that named Minoa and are not a share of its labels.
212 of the 260 domain citations in answers naming Minoa came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 75 | 19 | 2026-09-09 | CRM, Proposals | |
| Comparison | 23 | 22 | 2026-09-01 | CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 16 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2025-12-08 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 2 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page minoa.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Minoa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Minoa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Minoa by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Minoa first in Value selling tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.