Every category where a model named Bigtincan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales enablement and content	Sales	0%	79 of 81	50%	12	criticized challenger
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	38 of 59	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bigtincan yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bigtincan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative21 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Now all owned by Vector Capital under a new "eOS" packaging... Avoid signing new multi-year contracts” Kimi K2 · Sales enablement · negative prompt · hard negative

“Showpad merged with Bigtincan under Vector Capital ... M&A Integration Risk” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales enablement · negative prompt · hard negative

“Showpad is still actively working to seamlessly blend Bigtincan's legacy training features (like Brainshark) into its own system.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales enablement · negative prompt · soft negative

“Showpad combining with Bigtincan... often overkill for mid-sized organizations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bigtincan, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bigtincan was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Seismic43 of 4414Not in the top three

Highspot43 of 445Not in the top three

Showpad42 of 440Not in the top three

MindTickle33 of 446Not in the top three

Allego27 of 441Not in the top three

Spekit18 of 443Not in the top three

SalesHood16 of 441Not in the top three

Dock15 of 442Not in the top three

Brainshark13 of 440Not in the top three

Gong12 of 440Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bigtincan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 44 answers that named Bigtincan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

showpad.com5

captivateiq.com4

mindtickle.com4

apollo.io3

forrester.com3

itsconvo.com3

nooks.ai3

salesforce.com3

spekit.com3

viewpointanalysis.com3

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Bigtincan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

showpad.com/blog/revenue-effectiveness-platforms-guide-20265

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-enablement-platform4

mindtickle.com/blog/best-sales-enablement-platforms4

apollo.io/insights/best-sales-enablement-tools3

itsconvo.com/blog/sales-enablement-platforms3

nooks.ai/blog-posts/5-best-sales-enablement-platforms-for-outbound-teams-2026-comparison3

salesforce.com/sales/enablement/software3

spekit.com/blog/sales-enablement-platforms-apps3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Bigtincan

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bigtincan; a claim can dispute any of them.

Showpad / Bigtincan 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bigtincan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bigtincan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bigtincan.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.