AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Marketing › Marketing CMS › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Content management systems for marketing sites for enterprise buyers

Asked as “marketing website CMS”, and as “CMS for a marketing site”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · HubSpot Content Hub 18%
22Adobe Experience Manager18HubSpot Content Hub10Sitecore Experience Platform50others

22% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Adobe Experience Manager (23%) replaces Contentful (37% then, 9% now), 14 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Adobe Experience Manager leads at 23%, replacing Contentful, which led at 37% and stands at 9% now: 14 points clear, past the floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the October 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Adobe Experience Manager22%28%54criticized challenger▲+11Since September 2026: 12% → 23%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 23%
02HubSpot Content Hub18%10%30accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 6% → 18%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 18%
03Sitecore Experience Platform10%29%51criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 6% → 11%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 11%
04Contentful8%23%57accepted challenger▼−28Since September 2026: 37% → 9%, −28 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.37% → 9%
05WordPress8%35%49criticized challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 9%
06Contentstack4%6%17accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 5%
07Webflow4%11%18accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
08Optimizely CMS4%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09Storyblok4%21%19accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%
10Drupal2%28%32criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Sanity0%21%29accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Adobe Experience Manager22%
02HubSpot Content Hub18%
03Sitecore Experience Platform10%
04Contentful8%
05WordPress8%
06Contentstack4%
07Webflow4%
08Optimizely CMS4%
09Storyblok4%
10Drupal2%
11Sanity0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
WordPress
35%
17 of 49 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid for This Scale - WordPress/Drupal: Lacks native enterprise governance/security without heavy plugins.” Grok 4.1 Fast, paraphrase prompt
Adobe Experience Manager
28%
15 of 54 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid Adobe AEM and Sitecore unless you're already deeply invested in those ecosystems, as their pricing opacity makes budgeting difficult.” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Sitecore Experience Platform
29%
15 of 51 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Sitecore has a reputation for being expensive, complex, and requiring significant developer involvement” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Squarespace
100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Proprietary builders like Wix and Squarespace for mission-critical marketing sites due to limited advanced SEO control, scalability caps and lock-in.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1103 links across 310 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 5 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

35 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow33 answers · 54 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CoreMedia31 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · HubSpot21 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Webflow21 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · LinkedIn20 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Brightspot18 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Elcom15 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Agility CMS14 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · dotCMS14 answers · 24 citations · 10 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best marketing website cms”, “marketing website cms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Adobe parent site
Adobe Experience Manager 22%
22%991,220,000117,563
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Content Hub 18%
18%278368,0009,776
Sitecore Experience Platform sitecore.com10%6150432,655$10931
Contentful contentful.com8%13912,100128,66899,73075
WordPress wordpress.com8%203201,00042,40649,847,649$1813
Agility CMS agilitycms.com6%7
Contentstack contentstack.com4%242,9005441,27454
Webflow webflow.com4%19274,0002,193714,656$69059
Optimizely optimizely.com
Optimizely CMS 4%
4%23760,50036,211200,757 company$21206
Storyblok storyblok.com4%424,4005717,0557

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.hubspot.com, coremedia.com). The first result for “best marketing website cms” is lilbigthings.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best marketing website CMS for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CMS for a marketing site would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade content management systems for marketing websites and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best marketing website CMS for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a marketing website CMS. What should we look at?”Negative“Which content management systems for marketing websites should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Content Hub, Storyblok
Four alternativesBuilder.io, Contentful, Contentstack, Sitecore Experience Platform
Adobe Experience ManagerChanged
Three alternativesContentful, HubSpot Content Hub, Sitecore Experience Platform
HubSpot Content Hub
Four alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Kontent.ai, Sitecore Experience Platform, WordPress
Brightspot, Kontent.ai
One alternativedotCMS
against: Contentful, Storyblok
no first choiceagainst: Contentful, Prismic, Sanity, WordPress
GPT-5.4 miniAdobe Experience Manager
Three alternativesContentful, Sanity, Sitecore Experience Platform
Adobe Experience ManagerHeld
One alternativeSitecore Experience Platform
no first choiceStoryblok
One alternativeOptimizely CMS
against: Contentful, Sitecore Experience Platform
no first choice
Two alternativesContentful, Sanity
against: WordPress
Gemini 3.5 FlashHubSpot Content Hub, Webflow
Three alternativesContentful, Storyblok, WordPress
against: Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore Experience Platform
ContentfulChanged
Three alternativesOptimizely CMS, Storyblok, WordPress
against: Adobe Experience Manager, Drupal
no first choice
Seven alternativesAcquia Drupal, Adobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Contentstack, Optimizely CMS, Sitecore Experience Platform, WordPress
WordPress
Three alternativesCraft CMS, Drupal via Acquia or Pantheon, Payload CMS
against: Contentful, Sanity
no first choice
Two alternativesContentful, Sanity
against: Drupal, WordPress
against: Adobe Commerce, Adobe Experience Manager, Joomla, Self-hosted WordPress.org, Sitecore Experience Platform, Squarespace, Standard Shopify, Weebly, Wix
Perplexity SonarContentful
Five alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentstack, HubSpot Content Hub, Sitecore Experience Platform, Webflow
ContentstackChanged
Two alternativesContentful, CoreMedia
against: Adobe Experience Manager
no first choiceagainst: DrupalAdobe Experience Manager
Two alternativesHubSpot Content Hub, Webflow
no first choiceagainst: Squarespace, WordPress
Grok 4.1 Fastno first choice
Five alternativesAcquia DXP, Adobe Experience Manager, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely CMS, Sitecore Experience Platform
Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore Experience PlatformChanged
One alternativeContentful
against: Drupal, HubSpot Content Hub, Storyblok, WordPress
no first choiceAgility CMS
One alternativeKontent.ai
against: Acquia Drupal, Adobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Sanity, Sitecore Experience Platform, Storyblok
Contentful
Three alternativesContentstack, Sanity, Storyblok
against: WordPress
against: Contentful, Squarespace, Webflow, Wix, WordPress
Mistral SmallHubSpot Content Hub
Two alternativesWebflow, WordPress
Adobe Experience ManagerChanged
Three alternativesDrupal, Sitecore Experience Platform, WordPress
against: Optimizely CMS
no first choiceCoreMedia
One alternativeDrupal
against: Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore Experience Platform
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Contentstack, Drupal, Sitecore Experience Platform, WordPress
DeepSeek V4 FlashHubSpot Content Hub
Four alternativesContentful, Sanity, Sitecore Experience Platform, WordPress
against: Adobe Experience Manager
ContentstackChanged
Two alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, HubSpot Content Hub
against: Contentful
no first choice
Six alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Drupal, HubSpot Content Hub, Sitecore Experience Platform, Webflow
Agility CMS
Two alternativesOptimizely CMS, WordPress
against: Adobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Sanity, Sitecore Experience Platform, Storyblok
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager, Drupal, Joomla, Liferay, Optimizely CMS, Self-Managed WordPress, Sitecore Experience Platform, Squarespace, Wix
Llama 4 MaverickContentfulno first choiceChangedno first choiceCoreMedia, HubSpot Content Hubno first choiceagainst: Adobe Commerce, Drupal, HubSpot Content Hub, Joomla
Qwen 3.7 FlashSitecore Experience Platform
Four alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Drupal, WordPress
Adobe Experience ManagerChanged
Two alternativesContentful, Sitecore Experience Platform
against: Squarespace, Wix, WordPress
Adobe Experience Manager
Three alternativesDrupal, Oracle Content Management, Sitecore Experience Platform
Webflow, WordPressno first choiceagainst: Joomla, WordPress
Kimi K2HubSpot Content Hub
Four alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Sanity, Sitecore Experience Platform
Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore Experience PlatformChanged
One alternativeContentful
no first choice
Six alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Drupal, HubSpot Content Hub, Sitecore Experience Platform, WordPress
WordPress
Two alternativesContentful, Sitecore Experience Platform
against: Adobe Experience Manager, Optimizely CMS, Sanity, Sitecore Experience Platform
no first choiceagainst: Sitecore Experience Platform, Squarespace, Weebly, Wix, WordPress
GLM 4.7 FlashXSitecore Experience Platform
Four alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Drupal, HubSpot Content Hub
Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore Experience PlatformChanged
One alternativeDrupal
no first choiceAgility CMS
Two alternativesDrupal, HubSpot Content Hub
against: Contentful, WordPress
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager, HubSpot Content Hub, Shopify, Sitecore Experience Platform, Squarespace, Wix, WordPress
MiniMax M2.5HubSpot Content Hub
One alternativeContentful
against: Webflow
Adobe Experience ManagerChanged
Two alternativesDrupal, Sitecore Experience Platform
no first choice
Three alternativesSanity, Storyblok, Strapi
HubSpot Content Hub, WordPress
One alternativeWebflow
against: Contentful, Sitecore Experience Platform
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Drupal, Sanity, Sitecore Experience Platform, WordPress
GPT-6 LunaOptimizely CMS
Three alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Webflow
Optimizely CMSHeld
Two alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentful
no first choiceDrupalagainst: Contentful, WordPressno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager, Drupal, Sitecore Experience Platform, Squarespace, WordPress
Muse Glimmer 30BHubSpot Content Hub
Three alternativesAdobe Experience Manager, Contentful, Sitecore Experience Platform
Adobe Experience ManagerChanged
Four alternativesContentful, HubSpot Content Hub, Sitecore Experience Platform, WordPress
Adobe Experience Manager
Nine alternativesContentful, Contentstack, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely CMS, Prismic, Sanity, Storyblok, Strapi, Webflow
against: Sitecore Experience Platform
dotCMS
One alternativeSitecore Experience Platform
against: Adobe Experience Manager
no first choiceagainst: Shopify, Squarespace, Umbraco, Wix, WordPress
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:48yes99 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:32yes54 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:26yes1625 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:03yes204 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:46yes217 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:10yes57 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:08yes2327 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:52yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:45yes523 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:31yes1725 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:39yes2535 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:46yes1030 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:01yes516 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:21yes1338 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:24no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:31yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:17no018 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:50yes173 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:44yes187 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:44no06 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:46yes2145 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:41yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:53yes1030 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:13no07 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:55yes2170 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:54no041 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:21yes321 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:58yes1416 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:40yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 13:55no08 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:02yes2330 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:52yes207 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:38yes238 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:21yes1016 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:08yes2477 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:37yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:48yes1036 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:27yes2531 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:22yes2569 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:28yes1528 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 14:15yes726 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:48yes1228 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:38yes189 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:11yes48 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:25yes1632 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:32yes204 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:13yes219 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:54yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:03yes2523 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:00yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:29yes1036 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:49yes2523 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:03yes2282 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:53yes2579 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:24yes210 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:56yes2433 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:27yes1812 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:26yes311 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:33no014 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:50yes245 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:27yes157 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:49no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:29yes2362 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:59yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:29yes528 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:06yes2230 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 14:02yes2438 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:29yes517 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:19yes223 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 14:13yes1425 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:57yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:48yes49 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:57yes824 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:55yes195 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:42yes2311 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:31yes1944 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:29yes2553 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:28yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:58yes1960 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:51yes2528 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:24yes2535 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:04yes1447 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:03yes527 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:43yes1426 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acquia read as Acquia Drupal
Acquia (Drupal) read as Acquia Drupal
Adobe read as Adobe Experience Manager
Adobe AEM read as Adobe Experience Manager
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Sites read as Adobe Experience Manager
Adobe Experience Manager, AEM read as Adobe Experience Manager
HubSpot read as HubSpot Content Hub
Kentico read as Kentico Xperience
Magnolia read as Magnolia CMS
Sitecore read as Sitecore Experience Platform
Sitecore (XM Cloud) read as Sitecore Experience Platform
Sitecore (specifically XM Cloud) read as Sitecore Experience Platform
Sitecore XM Cloud read as Sitecore Experience Platform
Sitecore XP/XM read as Sitecore Experience Platform
Unresolved, counted raw
Acquia DXP (Drupal-based)
Acquia Drupal Cloud / Acquia DXP
CraftCMS
Drupal via Acquia or Pantheon
Hyland OnBase
Kentico Kontent.ai
Liferay
OpenText Content Management
Self-Managed WordPress
Self-hosted WordPress.org
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Competitive intelContent marketing →