Dashboards and data visualization for small business buyers
Asked as “business intelligence and dashboard tool”, and as “data visualization platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · Looker Studio 35%
37Microsoft Power BI35Looker Studio18Zoho Analytics11others
37% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+1Since September 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Microsoft Power BI held the lead, +1 point on 36%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Power BI37%Contested▲+1Since September 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Power BI52%Clear leader▼−11Since September 2026: 62% → 51%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI58%Clear leader▼−11Since September 2026: 70% → 58%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Microsoft Power BI37%Contested▲+1Since September 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Power BI52%Clear leader▼−11Since September 2026: 62% → 51%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI58%Clear leader▼−11Since September 2026: 70% → 58%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Microsoft Power BI37%9%75endorsed leader▲+1Since September 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.36% → 37%
Microsoft Power BI37%9%75endorsed leader▲+1Since September 2026: 36% → 37%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.36% → 37%02
Looker Studio Lab in the set35%3%66endorsed leader▲+1Since September 2026: 32% → 33%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.32% → 33%
Looker Studio Lab in the set35%3%66endorsed leader▲+1Since September 2026: 32% → 33%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.32% → 33%03
Zoho Analytics18%0%50accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 27% → 20%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 20%
Zoho Analytics18%0%50accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 27% → 20%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 20%04
Metabase9%7%58accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 8%
Metabase9%7%58accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 8%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
06
Sisense0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Sisense0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Looker Lab in the set0%78%23criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Looker Lab in the set0%78%23criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%05
Domo0%67%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Domo0%67%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Tableau0%59%51criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Tableau0%59%51criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice two times of 4; the other thirteen models eighteen times of 52. Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to head
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Microsoft Power BI vs Zoho AnalyticsMicrosoft Power BI vs SigmaMicrosoft Power BI vs DomoLooker Studio vs TableauLooker Studio vs MetabaseLooker Studio vs Zoho AnalyticsLooker Studio vs SigmaLooker Studio vs DomoTableau vs MetabaseTableau vs Zoho AnalyticsTableau vs SigmaTableau vs DomoMetabase vs Zoho AnalyticsMetabase vs SigmaMetabase vs DomoZoho Analytics vs SigmaZoho Analytics vs DomoSigma vs Domo
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Microsoft Power BI37%
Microsoft Power BI37%02Looker Studio35%
Looker Studio35%03Zoho Analytics18%
Zoho Analytics18%04Metabase9%
Metabase9%05Domo0%
Domo0%06Sisense0%
Sisense0%07Tableau0%
Tableau0%08Looker0%
Looker0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Looker78%
18 of 23 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“Why to avoid/be cautious: Looker is a highly sophisticated, developer-centric platform... If you do not have a dedicated data engineering team, Looker will quickly become unusable.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Tableau59%
30 of 51 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Enterprise-Grade BI Tools to Avoid ... **Tableau** | • Starts at $75/user/month ... Overkill for most small-business use cases” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Sisense100%
10 of 10 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Enterprise platforms from Qlik, Sisense, and Looker typically require custom quotes and annual contracts that start in the tens of thousands” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Domo67%
8 of 12 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“should avoid enterprise BI tools such as ... Sisense, and Domo, as they are too expensive and complex for small businesses” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 950 links across 266 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Coefficient31 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zoho27 answers · 52 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Domo19 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Viasocket17 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zite17 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Medium17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Holistics16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · OvalEdge15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 5 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best business intelligence and dashboard tool”, “business intelligence and dashboard tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power BI 37% | 37% | 242 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||
| Google cloud.google.com Looker Studio 35% | 35% | 116 | 40,500 | 452 | 7,405,347 | |
| Zoho parent site Zoho Analytics 18% | 18% | 89 | 2,900 | 23 | ||
| Metabase metabase.com | 9% | 112 | 14,800 | 337 | 60,151 | 1 |
| Databox databox.com | 2% | 19 | 3,600 | 68 | 60,861 | 4 |
| Coefficient coefficient.io | 0% | 6 | ||||
| Klipfolio klipfolio.com | 0% | 6 | 1,600 | 23 | 114,418 | 0 |
| Draxlr draxlr.com | 0% | 2 | 320 | 0 | 684 | 0 |
| Geckoboard | 0% | 880 | 15 | |||
| QuickSight | 0% |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (domo.com). The first result for “best business intelligence and dashboard tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best business intelligence and dashboard tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data visualization platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top business intelligence tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best business intelligence and dashboard tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a business intelligence and dashboard tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which business intelligence tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BILooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIHeldagainst: MetabaseZoho AnalyticsZoho Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Domo, Looker, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAS Visual Analytics, Sisense, Tableau
Three alternatives
Metabase, Tableau, Tableau PublicOne alternative
TableauFour alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, TableauThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Power BIagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIHeldMetabaseMicrosoft Power BIno first choiceagainst: Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Two alternatives
Looker Studio, MetabaseTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, TableauThree alternatives
Apache Superset, Microsoft Power BI, TableauTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, MetabaseGemini 3.5 FlashDataboxagainst: Microsoft Power BILooker StudioChangedLooker Studio, Metabaseagainst: Looker, Sisense, TableauLooker StudioMetabaseagainst: Looker Studioagainst: Domo, IBM Cognos, Looker, Oracle Analytics, SAP BusinessObjects, Sisense, Tableau
Three alternatives
HubSpot, Looker Studio, MetabaseThree alternatives
Databox, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIThree alternatives
Definite, Draxlr, Microsoft Power BIThree alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Equals, Microsoft Power BIPerplexity SonarZoho AnalyticsLooker StudioChangedZoho AnalyticsLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIno first choiceagainst: IBM Cognos, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau
Two alternatives
Databox, Microsoft Power BITwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsFive alternatives
Klipfolio, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, TableauTwo alternatives
Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsGrok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Looker, Sisense, TableauLooker StudioChangedLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: TableauLooker Studioagainst: Apache SupersetMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Tableauagainst: IBM Cognos, Looker, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau
Two alternatives
Looker Studio, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BIThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsMistral SmallZoho Analyticsno first choiceChangedLooker Studio, Zoho AnalyticsLooker Studio, Metabaseno first choiceagainst: Domo, Looker, Qlik Sense, Sisense, Tableau
One alternative
GeckoboardFive alternatives
Domo, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, QuickSight, TableauOne alternative
Zoho AnalyticsDeepSeek V4 FlashZoho Analyticsagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: TableauLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: Looker, TableauMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BI, Zoho Analyticsagainst: Looker, Tableauagainst: Domo, Looker, MicroStrategy, Qlik Sense, Sisense, Tableau
Two alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIOne alternative
Looker StudioTwo alternatives
Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, MetabaseLlama 4 MaverickZoho Analyticsno first choiceChangedCoefficient, Zoho AnalyticsMetabaseno first choiceagainst: Domo, Looker, Sisense, Tableau Creator, ThoughtSpot
Two alternatives
Metabase, ThoughtSpotThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsQwen 3.7 FlashLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: TableauLooker StudioChangedLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIMetabaseno first choiceagainst: Tableauagainst: Apache Superset, Domo, IBM Cognos, Looker, Metabase, Pentaho, SAP BusinessObjects, Sisense, Tableau, ThoughtSpot
Two alternatives
Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Geckoboard, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIThree alternatives
Metabase, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Coefficient, Databox, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIKimi K2Microsoft Power BI, Zoho Analyticsagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BILooker Studioagainst: Sisense, TableauMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Lookeragainst: IBM Cognos, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
One alternative
Looker StudioTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, TableauFive alternatives
Databox, Klipfolio, Looker Studio, Metabase, TableauFour alternatives
Draxlr, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsGLM 4.7 FlashXZoho AnalyticsLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BI, Zoho Analyticsagainst: LookerLooker Studio, Zoho Analyticsagainst: Apache Superset, QlikView Personal Editionno first choiceagainst: Apache Superset, Domo, Sisenseagainst: BigQuery, Domo, IBM Cognos, Microsoft Fabric, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau
Two alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BIOne alternative
Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, TableauThree alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, RedashFive alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsMiniMax M2.5Microsoft Power BI, Zoho Analyticsagainst: TableauLooker StudioChangedagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BI, Zoho Analyticsagainst: LookerLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIno first choiceagainst: Looker, Tableau
One alternative
GrowTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Coefficient, TableauOne alternative
MetabaseGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Qlik Cloud AnalyticsLooker Studiono first choiceagainst: Looker, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Two alternatives
Looker Studio, MetabaseTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, TableauThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, TableauTwo alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BIFour alternatives
Looker, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, TableauMuse Glimmer 30BMetabaseLooker StudioChangedagainst: TableauMetabase, Microsoft Power BIagainst: Looker, TableauLooker StudioLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Cloud Analytics, Qlik Sense, Tableau
Two alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIOne alternative
Microsoft Power BIOne alternative
Looker StudioTwo alternatives
Metabase, Power BI DesktopOne alternative
Zoho AnalyticsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:06 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:17 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:15 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 19 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 19 | 103 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:50 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 14:09 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:28 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:57 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:14 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 20 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:32 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:32 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:10 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:30 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 10 | 62 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 13 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:41 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 16 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:49 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:11 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:10 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:14 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:43 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:30 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:08 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:41 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:56 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 14 | 73 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:25 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 25 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 24 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 24 | 100 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:38 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
Unresolved, counted raw
Datapine
Grow
Hex Community
QlikView Personal Edition
SAS Visual Analytics
Salesforce
ThoughtSpot Free Edition
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.