Every category where a model named Sisense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Dashboards and data visualization	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	11 of 73	18%	22	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sisense yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sisense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	3	0	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Sisense or other embedded-focused platforms if your B2B product needs to embed analytics into a customer-facing application” DeepSeek V4 Flash · BI & dashboards · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“another excellent, more traditional low-code/no-code alternative for embedded BI, though it carries a higher price tag” Gemini 3.5 Flash · BI & dashboards · direct prompt · alternative

“Sisense is often preferred over the big players because its chips allow for fast processing of massive datasets” Qwen 3.7 Flash · BI & dashboards · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“SaaS companies and product teams pick it when the goal is delivering analytics directly to end users.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · BI & dashboards · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Buggy UI and unreliable customer support ... Complex and expensive pricing model” GLM 4.7 FlashX · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · hard negative

“Sisense — ~$21K+/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · BI & dashboards · budget prompt · hard negative

“Exercise caution and perform strict due diligence. In April 2024, Sisense suffered a severe supply-chain data breach.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative

“High implementation overhead; less intuitive UI; enterprise pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sisense, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sisense was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power BI47 of 4927Not in the top three

Tableau46 of 496Not in the top three

Looker46 of 490Not in the top three

Domo35 of 490Not in the top three

ThoughtSpot33 of 491Not in the top three

Qlik Sense31 of 490Not in the top three

Metabase25 of 491Not in the top three

Looker Studio19 of 497Not in the top three

Sigma18 of 490Not in the top three

Zoho Analytics16 of 492Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sisense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 49 answers that named Sisense and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ovaledge.com5

domo.com4

mopinion.com4

qlik.com4

tellius.com4

monday.com3

selecthub.com3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com3

toolradar.com3

cio.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Sisense came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ovaledge.com/blog/business-intelligence-tools5

mopinion.com/business-intelligence-bi-tools-overview4

qlik.com/us/business-intelligence/business-intelligence-tools4

tellius.com/resources/blog/best-business-intelligence-platforms-in-2026-13-platforms-compa4

domo.com/learn/article/business-intelligence-tools3

monday.com/blog/project-management/bi-tools3

ovaledge.com/blog-template-test/the-best-business-intelligence-tools-in-2026-compared-and-3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/business-intelligence-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Sisense.

Website: sisense.com
Headquarters: Tel Aviv, United States
Founded: 2010

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sisense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sisense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sisense.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.