| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dashboards and data visualization | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 11 of 52 | 29% | 17 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 128 of 159 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Experimentation and personalization | Marketing | 0% | 66 of 71 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by VWO at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI & dashboards | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 of 52, unchanged |
| DMP | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 128 of 159, unchanged |
| Experimentation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 66 of 71, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Sisense if you're a B2B SaaS company wanting to embed analytics in your product.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · BI & dashboards · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Sisense is a more robust, enterprise-grade tool with an API-first architecture” Gemini 3.5 Flash · BI & dashboards · direct prompt · alternative
“Sisense is best for embedded analytics with API-first architecture for developers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · BI & dashboards · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Sisense if you need to embed analytics in your product for customers” Kimi K2 · BI & dashboards · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
““High cost, less suitable for SMBs” and “Limited flexibility; vendor lock-in”” Muse Glimmer 30B · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid implementing any self-service tool (Tableau, Power BI, Sisense) without establishing data governance rules first.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative
“Drawbacks: High costs, performance lags on big data, cumbersome modeling (Elasticube), limited visuals.” Grok 4.20 · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative
“advises small-to-medium businesses to avoid these unless they have dedicated data teams and large budgets” MiniMax M2.5 · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 46 answers that named Sisense and are not a share of its labels.
124 of the 124 domain citations in answers naming Sisense came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 1,765 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | ||
| Blog | 126 | 2 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 65 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| News or press | 48 | 0 | 2026-05-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 44 | 0 | 2024-08-26 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 34 | 2 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 2 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2024-08-26 |
As the event pages on sisense.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page sisense.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Sisense's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sisense.com, sisense.com/plans, trust.sisense.com, sisense.com/solutions, sisense.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sisense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sisense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sisense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: