AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Sisense · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Sisense

46Judge labels
1First choices
22Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in BI & dashboards for enterprise buyers
Rank 11 of 52 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Sisense →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In bi & dashboards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sisense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Dashboards and data visualizationGTM data and infrastructure0%11 of 5229%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Data management platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%128 of 1590%1under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing0%66 of 71100%1under 10 labels · led by VWO at 27%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Sisense held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · BI & dashboards · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 53 → 47 of 49
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 49, unchanged
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 39 → 4 of 48

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
BI & dashboards0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 of 52, unchanged
DMP0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 128 of 159, unchanged
Experimentation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 66 of 71, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Sisense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000112
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash00112
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500022
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Sisense if you're a B2B SaaS company wanting to embed analytics in your product.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · BI & dashboards · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Sisense is a more robust, enterprise-grade tool with an API-first architecture” Gemini 3.5 Flash · BI & dashboards · direct prompt · alternative
“Sisense is best for embedded analytics with API-first architecture for developers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · BI & dashboards · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Sisense if you need to embed analytics in your product for customers” Kimi K2 · BI & dashboards · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

““High cost, less suitable for SMBs” and “Limited flexibility; vendor lock-in”” Muse Glimmer 30B · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid implementing any self-service tool (Tableau, Power BI, Sisense) without establishing data governance rules first.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative
“Drawbacks: High costs, performance lags on big data, cumbersome modeling (Elasticube), limited visuals.” Grok 4.20 · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative
“advises small-to-medium businesses to avoid these unless they have dedicated data teams and large budgets” MiniMax M2.5 · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sisense, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sisense was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Power BI43 of 4623Not among the top eight
Tableau41 of 469Not among the top eight
Looker34 of 461Not among the top eight
Qlik Sense27 of 460Not among the top eight
Domo25 of 460Not among the top eight
ThoughtSpot20 of 460Not among the top eight
Metabase17 of 463Not among the top eight
Looker Studio13 of 466Not among the top eight
Zoho Analytics13 of 461Not among the top eight
Sigma8 of 461Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sisense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 46 answers that named Sisense and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

sisense.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sisense takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Power BI takes 52%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “business intelligence and dashboard tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best business intelligence and dashboard tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,400 a month (“sisense”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
140 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 29,511 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,798 · 343 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,560
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 18 clicks and $243 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
44 ads · 44 text · 15 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2022, as Sisense Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 19 in the year, 25 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 52 in BI & dashboards
Segment leader
52%
Microsoft Power BI
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
46 answers
Its own site cited
in 45 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sisense.com
5,167
subdomains included
Content
2,095
counted in the table below
Documentation
10
Product · Integration
10 · 209
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook1,76512026-08-03
Blog12622026-09-25
Glossary or explainer6512026-09-25
News or press4802026-05-04
Conference or event4402024-08-26
Webinar or virtual event3422026-09-17
Comparison1122026-08-25
Case study202024-08-26

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on sisense.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sisense.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Sisense

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sisense.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Tel Aviv, United States
Founded
2010

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered embedded analytics platform
For
customers with customer-facing products
Free plan or trial
Try free sisense.com/plans
Certifications
HIPAA-ready complianceHIPAA readinessSOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27701ISO/IEC 42001:2023HIPAA
Hosting
SaaSdedicated cloudon-premAWSAzureGCP
Customers named
CropinBigtincanTessituraBarriosFunraiseiQuantivWalMartPepsiCo
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations

What Sisense's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sisense.com, sisense.com/plans, trust.sisense.com, sisense.com/solutions, sisense.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sisense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sisense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sisense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sisense is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sisense, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sisense.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.