Every category where a model named ThoughtSpot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Dashboards and data visualization	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	5 of 73	8%	26	accepted challenger
Customer intelligence and data science	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	65 of 158	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ThoughtSpot yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ThoughtSpot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	3	0	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	2	0	4
Kimi K2	0	0	3	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained12 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative69 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ThoughtSpot - Best for AI-powered business intelligence with GenAI-powered self-serve experience.” Llama 4 Maverick · BI & dashboards · direct prompt · first choice

“Choose ThoughtSpot if your goal is to empower *everyone* to self-serve without teaching them to code.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · BI & dashboards · comparative prompt · alternative

“Select ThoughtSpot if: Your leadership team is frustrated because they wait days/weeks for reports” Qwen 3.7 Flash · BI & dashboards · direct prompt · alternative

“If you want AI-powered self-service: ThoughtSpot (natural language query, automated insights)” Mistral Small · BI & dashboards · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ThoughtSpot — Starts at $25/user but balloons quickly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · BI & dashboards · budget prompt · hard negative

“Pricing opacity; consumption model can escalate significantly” Kimi K2 · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ThoughtSpot, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThoughtSpot was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tableau64 of 699Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI62 of 6939Not in the top three

Looker54 of 690Not in the top three

Domo39 of 690Not in the top three

Qlik Sense37 of 690Not in the top three

Sisense33 of 690Not in the top three

Metabase30 of 693Not in the top three

Sigma30 of 691Not in the top three

Looker Studio22 of 698Not in the top three

Zoho Analytics16 of 693Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ThoughtSpot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 69 answers that named ThoughtSpot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qlik.com5

mopinion.com4

ovaledge.com4

tellius.com4

thedigitalprojectmanager.com4

thoughtspot.comYour site4

cio.com3

domo.com3

selecthub.com3

toolradar.com3

Thirty-three of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming ThoughtSpot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mopinion.com/business-intelligence-bi-tools-overview4

ovaledge.com/blog/business-intelligence-tools4

qlik.com/us/business-intelligence/business-intelligence-tools4

tellius.com/resources/blog/best-business-intelligence-platforms-in-2026-13-platforms-compa4

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/business-intelligence-tools4

cio.com/article/222558/top-business-intelligence-bi-tools.html3

domo.com/learn/article/business-intelligence-tools3

ovaledge.com/blog-template-test/the-best-business-intelligence-tools-in-2026-compared-and-3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ThoughtSpot

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ThoughtSpot; a claim can dispute any of them.

ThoughtSpot Free 1

The company

ThoughtSpot.

Website: thoughtspot.com
Headquarters: Palo Alto, United States
Founded: 2012

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ThoughtSpot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ThoughtSpot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thoughtspot.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.