Every category where a model named Qlik Sense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Dashboards and data visualization	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	7 of 73	16%	25	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qlik Sense yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qlik Sense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	2	2	1	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels2

Comparative22 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Qlik Sense is a powerful tool for associative analysis and is a good fit for mid-market and enterprise organizations.” Llama 4 Maverick · BI & dashboards · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you have complex data relationships: Qlik Sense (associative analytics model)” Mistral Small · BI & dashboards · scale prompt · alternative

“Qlik Sense: Choose if you need associative analytics and free-form exploration” MiniMax M2.5 · BI & dashboards · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose Qlik if you need deep, associative data exploration capabilities.” Mistral Small · BI & dashboards · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Performance degradation with large datasets (slow around 5GB) ... Steep learning curve” GLM 4.7 FlashX · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative

“Steeper learning curve; performance degradation with large datasets” Kimi K2 · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative

“Qlik Sense (but consider strategic uncertainty)” Mistral Small · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative

“Steeper learning curve than competitors” MiniMax M2.5 · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qlik Sense, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qlik Sense was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power BI70 of 7047Not in the top three

Tableau68 of 709Not in the top three

Looker56 of 700Not in the top three

Domo42 of 700Not in the top three

ThoughtSpot37 of 700Not in the top three

Sisense31 of 700Not in the top three

Metabase21 of 701Not in the top three

Sigma21 of 701Not in the top three

Looker Studio17 of 704Not in the top three

SAP Analytics Cloud15 of 700Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qlik Sense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 70 answers that named Qlik Sense and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

holistics.io4

ovaledge.com4

qlik.com4

tellius.com4

thedigitalprojectmanager.com4

thoughtspot.com4

toolradar.com4

cio.com3

domo.com3

improvado.io3

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Qlik Sense came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

holistics.io/blog/business-intelligence-bi-tools4

ovaledge.com/blog/business-intelligence-tools4

tellius.com/resources/blog/best-business-intelligence-platforms-in-2026-13-platforms-compa4

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/business-intelligence-tools4

cio.com/article/222558/top-business-intelligence-bi-tools.html3

domo.com/learn/article/business-intelligence-tools3

mopinion.com/business-intelligence-bi-tools-overview3

ovaledge.com/blog-template-test/the-best-business-intelligence-tools-in-2026-compared-and-3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Qlik Sense

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Qlik Sense; a claim can dispute any of them.

Qlik Sense / Qlik Cloud Analytics 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qlik Sense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qlik Sense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qliksense.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.