Index › Revenue operations › CPQ › Enterprise › September 2026 Edition

CPQ for enterprise buyers

Asked as “CPQ software”, and as “configure, price, quote tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.

Standing

Salesforce CPQ

Contested

31% of first choices, contested.

ShowinginAll 73 categories in the September 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

Small business

PandaDoc54%Clear leaderStanding →Mid-market

DealHub62%ConsensusStanding →Enterprise

Salesforce CPQ31%ContestedThis page

01The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.

ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant

Salesforce CPQ29%42criticized default

Salesforce Revenue Cloud6%33accepted challenger

Oracle CPQ14%56accepted challenger

DealHub9%46accepted challenger

05SAP CPQ15%48accepted challenger

PROS Smart CPQ5%21accepted challenger

Conga CPQ7%44accepted challenger

Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate

Experlogix30%10criticized challenger

Tacton5%20accepted challenger

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its vendor page.

Head to head

DealHub vs PandaDoc DealHub vs QuoteWerks PandaDoc vs QuoteWerks

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default

Negative label rate →

S05

Accepted challengerEndorsed leader

0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%

Key

Salesforce CPQ31%

Salesforce Revenue Cloud29%

Oracle CPQ18%

DealHub6%

05SAP CPQ6%

PROS Smart CPQ4%

Conga CPQ2%

Tacton0%

Experlogix0%

02What they warned about

Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.

Salesforce CPQ

29%

12 of 42 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 7 hard negative

“Clunky UX leading to low sales adoption; performance degradation with high-volume or multi-dimensional quotes... Avoid/Be Cautious If: Not fully Salesforce-native” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

Oracle CPQ

14%

8 of 56 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 4 hard negative

“enterprise buyers are advised to avoid **monolithic architectures** if they need a diverse stack and composable integrations” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt

SAP CPQ

15%

7 of 48 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative

“Complex setup/integration outside SAP ecosystem; unintuitive UI for subscriptions/amendments; resource-intensive” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

DealHub

4 of 46 labels negative · 4 of 12 models

“may cost less to deploy, but it is usually not the safest answer for thousands of users with complex enterprise requirements” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt

03What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: four of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

23 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 6 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 212 links across 88 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 8 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.

guideflow.com

vendor site · Guideflow10 answers · 11 citations · 2 models

monday.com

vendor site · Monday.com8 answers · 12 citations · 2 models

cincom.com

vendor site · Cincom7 answers · 11 citations · 2 models

dealhub.io

vendor site · DealHub7 answers · 8 citations · 3 models

mobileforce.ai

7 answers · 8 citations · 2 models

qobra.co

vendor site · Qobra7 answers · 7 citations · 2 models

gartner.com

vendor site · Gartner5 answers · 8 citations · 3 models

salesforce.com

vendor site · Salesforce5 answers · 7 citations · 1 model

blog.alguna.com

vendor site · Alguna5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models

zoovu.com

vendor site · Zoovu5 answers · 5 citations · 2 models

canvaslogic.com

4 answers · 4 citations · 2 models

conga.com

vendor site · Conga4 answers · 4 citations · 2 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

guideflow.com/blog/best-cpq-software

10 answers · 2 models

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq-software

7 answers · 2 models

qobra.co/blog/cpq-software

7 answers · 2 models

cincom.com/blog/cpq/best-cpq-tools

6 answers · 2 models

dealhub.io/blog/cpq/best-cpq-software-2026

6 answers · 2 models

mobileforce.ai/blog/best-cpq-software-in-2025-complete-guide-to-ai-powered-…

6 answers · 2 models

gartner.com/reviews/market/configure-price-quote-applications

5 answers · 3 models

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/cpq

5 answers · 2 models

zoovu.com/blog/best-cpq-software

5 answers · 2 models

canvaslogic.com/best-cpq-software-for-enterprise

4 answers · 2 models

04How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.

ModelDirect“What is the best CPQ software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which configure, price, quote tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade CPQ tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best CPQ software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a CPQ software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which CPQ tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”

Claude Haiku 4.5Oracle CPQ, Salesforce CPQ

One alternative

SAP CPQ

Salesforce CPQChanged

Two alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ

Salesforce CPQ

Five alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, ServiceNow

Salesforce Revenue Cloud

One alternative

DealHub

against: Oracle CPQno first choiceagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ, Vendavo

GPT-5.4 miniSalesforce Revenue Management/CPQ

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ

Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQChanged

One alternative

Salesforce CPQ

no first choice

Seven alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Oracle CPQ

One alternative

Conga CPQ

against: Salesforce CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choicenothing named

Gemini 3.5 FlashDealHub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Tacton

Salesforce CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudChanged

Five alternatives

Conga Smart CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Tacton

no first choice

Seven alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Infor CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton

Conga CPQ

Three alternatives

DealHub, Elfsquad CPQ, Experlogix

against: Salesforce CPQSalesforce Revenue Cloud

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ

against: HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, SAP or Oracle ERP quoting tools, Salesforce CPQ

Perplexity SonarSalesforce CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ

PROS Smart CPQ, Salesforce CPQChangedSalesforce CPQ

Six alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ

SAP CPQ

Two alternatives

Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

against: DealHubno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ

Grok 4.1 FastOracle CPQ, Salesforce CPQ

Two alternatives

Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ

Salesforce CPQChanged

Three alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ

Salesforce CPQ

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ

against: DealHubSalesforce CPQ

Three alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ

Salesforce CPQ

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, PROS, SAP CPQ

against: Apparound, Conga CPQ, Epicor CPQ, FPX, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ, Yagna iQ

Mistral SmallSalesforce Revenue Cloud

Five alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ

Salesforce Revenue CloudHeld

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ

Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Six alternatives

Cincom CPQ, Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ

Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Three alternatives

DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ

no first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ, ServiceNow CPQ

DeepSeek V4 FlashSalesforce Revenue Cloud

Five alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Tacton

Salesforce Revenue CloudHeld

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Tacton

no first choice

Seven alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton

PROS Smart CPQ

Three alternatives

Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

against: Oracle CPQ Cloudno first choiceagainst: Cosential, DealHub, Epicor CPQ, Model N, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Quotient, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ, Tacton

Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceDealHub, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce CPQChangedno first choiceOracle CPQ

Two alternatives

DealHub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

no first choicenothing named

Qwen 3.7 FlashSalesforce CPQ

Four alternatives

Konfig, Microsoft Dynamics 365 CPQ, Oracle CPQ Cloud, Zingier

Oracle CPQ, Salesforce CPQChanged

One alternative

DealHub

against: Zoho Creator/CRM CPQno first choiceConga Smart CPQ, Salesforce CPQ

One alternative

Oracle CPQ

no first choiceagainst: Salesforce CPQ

Kimi K2Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ

Salesforce Revenue CloudHeld

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ

Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Eight alternatives

Conga Smart CPQ, DealHub, Infor, Model N, Oracle CPQ, PROS, SAP CPQ, Tacton

SAP CPQ

One alternative

Oracle CPQ Cloud

against: DealHub, Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Three alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ

against: PROS, Vendavoagainst: Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ

GLM 4.7 FlashXSalesforce Revenue Cloud

Six alternatives

Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Tacton

against: HubSpot Sales Hub, PandaDocSalesforce Revenue CloudHeld

Four alternatives

Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, ServiceNow CPQ with Logik.io

no first choiceOracle CPQ

Three alternatives

Conga CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

no first choiceagainst: Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ

MiniMax M2.5Salesforce CPQ

Two alternatives

Guideflow, Turnstile

against: Monday.com CPQOracle CPQ, Salesforce CPQChanged

One alternative

Conga CPQ

no first choice

Seven alternatives

Conga Smart CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce CPQ, Tacton

Salesforce CPQ

Two alternatives

DealHub, PROS Smart CPQ

no first choiceagainst: Salesforce CPQ

Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

05The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record

Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.

Prompt	Model	Version string	Time (UTC)	Searched	Sources	Latency
Direct recommendation	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-15 00:32	yes	7	6 s
Direct recommendation	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-15 03:26	yes	5	4 s
Direct recommendation	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-15 03:49	yes	10	20 s
Direct recommendation	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-15 03:57	yes	20	4 s
Direct recommendation	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-15 01:20	yes	0	8 s
Direct recommendation	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-14 23:13	yes	0	10 s
Direct recommendation	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-09-14 23:52	yes	0	29 s
Direct recommendation	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-15 02:29	yes	0	2 s
Direct recommendation	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-15 03:10	no	0	34 s
Direct recommendation	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-14 23:38	yes	0	46 s
Direct recommendation	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-15 01:30	yes	0	33 s
Direct recommendation	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-14 22:56	yes	0	10 s
Paraphrase	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-15 02:20	yes	9	9 s
Paraphrase	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-15 00:27	yes	2	5 s
Paraphrase	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-15 03:55	yes	15	19 s
Paraphrase	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-15 01:58	yes	20	5 s
Paraphrase	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-15 03:13	yes	0	8 s
Paraphrase	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-15 04:53	yes	0	7 s
Paraphrase	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-15 03:20	yes	0	21 s
Paraphrase	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-15 02:16	yes	0	2 s
Paraphrase	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-14 23:39	yes	0	14 s
Paraphrase	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-15 00:39	yes	0	32 s
Paraphrase	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-15 01:05	yes	0	164 s
Paraphrase	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-14 23:15	yes	0	11 s
Comparative	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-15 02:26	yes	8	7 s
Comparative	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-15 00:45	yes	6	8 s
Comparative	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-15 01:25	yes	18	39 s
Comparative	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-15 04:04	yes	20	10 s
Comparative	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-15 04:57	yes	0	7 s
Comparative	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-15 00:39	yes	0	8 s
Comparative	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-09-15 00:06	yes	0	47 s
Comparative	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-14 23:41	yes	0	2 s
Comparative	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-15 00:48	yes	0	41 s
Comparative	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-14 23:04	yes	0	54 s
Comparative	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-15 05:01	yes	0	35 s
Comparative	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-15 00:33	yes	0	14 s
Budget constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-14 23:56	yes	16	9 s
Budget constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-15 02:14	yes	3	5 s
Budget constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-14 23:30	yes	26	27 s
Budget constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-15 04:59	yes	20	5 s
Budget constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-15 04:48	yes	0	9 s
Budget constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-14 23:09	yes	0	12 s
Budget constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-09-15 02:13	yes	0	55 s
Budget constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-15 01:52	yes	0	2 s
Budget constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-15 01:08	yes	0	64 s
Budget constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-15 03:20	yes	0	59 s
Budget constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-15 01:15	yes	0	59 s
Budget constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-14 23:34	yes	0	51 s
Scale constrained	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-15 02:46	yes	13	13 s
Scale constrained	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-14 23:49	yes	6	6 s
Scale constrained	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-14 23:24	yes	14	30 s
Scale constrained	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-15 02:47	yes	20	9 s
Scale constrained	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-14 23:13	yes	0	9 s
Scale constrained	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-14 23:38	no	0	10 s
Scale constrained	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra`	2026-09-15 01:56	yes	0	49 s
Scale constrained	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-15 02:27	yes	0	3 s
Scale constrained	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-15 04:36	no	0	38 s
Scale constrained	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-15 04:04	yes	0	74 s
Scale constrained	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-14 23:37	yes	0	84 s
Scale constrained	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-15 01:43	yes	0	19 s
Negative framing	Claude Haiku 4.5	`claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`	2026-09-15 04:13	yes	17	10 s
Negative framing	GPT-5.4 mini	`gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`	2026-09-15 00:55	no	0	5 s
Negative framing	Gemini 3.5 Flash	`gemini-3.5-flash`	2026-09-15 02:01	yes	12	31 s
Negative framing	Perplexity Sonar	`sonar`	2026-09-14 23:59	yes	20	7 s
Negative framing	Grok 4.1 Fast	`spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex`	2026-09-15 05:07	yes	0	11 s
Negative framing	Mistral Small	`mistral/mistral-small via mistral`	2026-09-15 00:35	yes	0	8 s
Negative framing	DeepSeek V4 Flash	`deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks`	2026-09-14 23:33	yes	0	22 s
Negative framing	Llama 4 Maverick	`meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock`	2026-09-14 23:15	yes	0	3 s
Negative framing	Qwen 3.7 Flash	`alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba`	2026-09-15 03:14	yes	0	25 s
Negative framing	Kimi K2	`moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita`	2026-09-15 01:43	yes	0	60 s
Negative framing	GLM 4.7 FlashX	`zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai`	2026-09-15 01:44	yes	0	18 s
Negative framing	MiniMax M2.5	`minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax`	2026-09-15 02:41	yes	0	14 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

Category-scoped readings

Conga read as Conga CPQ

Conga (formerly Apttus) read as Conga CPQ

Epicor read as Epicor CPQ

Oracle read as Oracle CPQ

Salesforce read as Salesforce CPQ

Salesforce (Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce CPQ

Unresolved, counted raw

Apparound

Cogniative

Configure One

Cosential

DeelHub

Elfsquad CPQ

FP10

FPX

Infor/Bit2win

Konfig

Kugamon

Microsoft Dynamics 365 CPQ

Oracle CPQ Cloud

SAP or Oracle ERP quoting tools

Salesforce Revenue Management/CPQ

ServiceNow CPQ with Logik.io

Vendori

Yagna iQ

Zilliant

Zingier

Zoho Creator/CRM CPQ

Discontinued, still offered

No shut-down product was recommended here.

CPQ for enterprise buyers

By buyer segment

01The standing

Recommended versus criticized

02What they warned about

03What they cite

Sites the answers cite

Pages the answers cite

04How they answered

05The record

Normalization in this category

Also in revenue operations