| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 2% | 10 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Chatbots and conversational AI for support | Customer | 0% | 31 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom Fin AI Agent at 41% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 38 of 87 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13% | |
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 0% | 52 of 91 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 60 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support chatbots | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 31 of 114 |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 10 of 66, unchanged |
| Conversational mktg | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 87, unchanged |
| Conversation intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 91, unchanged |
| In-app messaging | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 66 → 60 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For tightest budgets: Start with Yesware (free) or Zoho SalesIQ ($7/user)” Kimi K2 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · first choice
“For Growing Businesses: Zoho SalesIQ offers the best value at under $15/month.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Support chatbots · budget prompt · alternative
“Top Pick for Phone Calls (Not Just Video) Tool: Zoho SalesIQ / Zoho CRM” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Conversation intel · budget prompt · alternative
“one of the lowest-cost options at about $7 per operator” Perplexity Sonar · Support chatbots · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named Zoho SalesIQ and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Zoho SalesIQ came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Zoho SalesIQ's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zoho.com/salesiq, zoho.com/salesiq/customers, zoho.com/salesiq/demo.html, zoho.com/salesiq/live-chat-software, zoho.com/salesiq/crm-live-chat.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho SalesIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho SalesIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho SalesIQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: