| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatbots and conversational AI for support | Customer | 14% | 2 of 114 | 5% | 37 | accepted challenger | ▼−7Since September 2026: 21% → 14%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational marketing platforms | Marketing | 13% | 1 of 87 | 10% | 31 | accepted challenger | |
| Customer support and helpdesk | Customer | 0% | 24 of 55 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Zendesk Support Suite at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 0% | 89 of 91 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 65 of 84 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 0% | 29 of 49 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 69 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational mktg | 0% | 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 13% now. | New this edition | Rank 1 of 87, unchanged |
| Support chatbots | 21% | 14% | ▼−7Since September 2026: 21% → 14%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 114, unchanged |
| Helpdesk | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 24 of 55 |
| Conversation intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 89 of 91, unchanged |
| Feedback | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 65 of 84, unchanged |
| Customer success | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 29 of 49 |
| In-app messaging | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 69 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need one pick for most limited-budget companies needing website conversational marketing today, Tidio is the consensus affordable entry point” Muse Glimmer 30B · Conversational mktg · budget prompt · first choice
“Tidio - Offers a free tier with basic chatbot functionality, live chat, and automation. It's user-friendly and doesn't require coding skills.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Support chatbots · budget prompt · first choice
“Best low-cost standalone option: Tidio — usually easier to justify when you just need website chat and basic automation.” GPT-5.4 mini · Conversational mktg · budget prompt · first choice
“Tidio is the best overall budget-friendly choice because it is repeatedly described as having an affordable entry point” Perplexity Sonar · Conversational mktg · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users frequently cite "billing issues," lack of responsive support, and feelings that they were "misled" during the sales process.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Support chatbots · negative prompt · hard negative
“described as meeting-note or chat tools that appear in CI rankings mainly because they do transcription” Perplexity Sonar · Conversation intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Billing and auto-renewal issues, integration limitations with certain CRMs, steep plan jumps, and conversation overage costs.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Helpdesk · negative prompt · soft negative
“you should be cautious about relying on Tidio if you plan to scale into complex B2B territory” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Conversational mktg · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 228 of the 241 answers that named Tidio and are not a share of its labels.
559 of the 630 domain citations in answers naming Tidio came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 438 | undated | |||
| Case study | 70 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 64 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 16 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 3 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Every page tidio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
What Tidio's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tidio.com, tidio.com/pricing, trust.tidio.com, tidio.com/features, tidio.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tidio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tidio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tidio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Tidio is among the products AI models recommend first in Chatbots and conversational AI for support this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
AI models recommend Tidio first in Conversational marketing platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.