| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatbots and conversational AI for support | Customer | 0% | 22 of 106 | 20% | 15 | accepted challenger |
| Customer support and helpdesk | Customer | 0% | 53 of 59 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Freshdesk at 44% |
| Knowledge base and self-service | Customer | 0% | 70 of 96 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Notion at 18% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Full support platform + AI: Zendesk” GPT-5.4 mini · Support chatbots · comparative prompt · first choice
“Native Helpdesk Bots: *Zendesk Advanced AI*, *Intercom Fin*, or *Kustomer KIQ* (great if you want everything in one system).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Support chatbots · scale prompt · alternative
“Mature ecosystem (1,500+ integrations), great for high-volume ticketing/SLAs. More expensive (~2x Intercom) but reliable” Grok 4.1 Fast · Support chatbots · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Teams Already on Zendesk ... Deep native integration but higher total cost; primarily deflection-focused” Kimi K2 · Support chatbots · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Zendesk is significantly more expensive ($55-169/agent/month + AI add-ons) and complex to configure” Kimi K2 · Support chatbots · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Cons: Expensive — $55–$115/agent/month for the platform plus ~$1.50/resolution for AI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Support chatbots · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Helply would cost ~$1,000/month vs. Zendesk AI at ~$2,500+ with add-ons” Mistral Small · Support chatbots · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Zendesk’s AI Agent charges between $1.50 and $2.00 per resolution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Helpdesk · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 56 answers that named Zendesk AI and are not a share of its labels.
Forty-two of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming Zendesk AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zendesk AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zendesk AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zendesk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.