GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Zendesk AI · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Zendesk AI

56Judge labels
2First choices
14Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Support chatbots for enterprise buyers
Rank 22 of 106 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 15 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In support chatbots · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zendesk AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Chatbots and conversational AI for supportCustomer0%22 of 10620%15accepted challenger
Customer support and helpdeskCustomer0%53 of 59100%1under 10 labels · led by Freshdesk at 44%
Knowledge base and self-serviceCustomer0%70 of 960%1under 10 labels · led by Notion at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zendesk AI yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zendesk AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini10102
Gemini 3.5 Flash03014
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast03003
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels1
Paraphrase16 labels1
Comparative14 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Full support platform + AI: Zendesk” GPT-5.4 mini · Support chatbots · comparative prompt · first choice
“Native Helpdesk Bots: *Zendesk Advanced AI*, *Intercom Fin*, or *Kustomer KIQ* (great if you want everything in one system).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Support chatbots · scale prompt · alternative
“Mature ecosystem (1,500+ integrations), great for high-volume ticketing/SLAs. More expensive (~2x Intercom) but reliable” Grok 4.1 Fast · Support chatbots · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Teams Already on Zendesk ... Deep native integration but higher total cost; primarily deflection-focused” Kimi K2 · Support chatbots · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Zendesk is significantly more expensive ($55-169/agent/month + AI add-ons) and complex to configure” Kimi K2 · Support chatbots · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Cons: Expensive — $55–$115/agent/month for the platform plus ~$1.50/resolution for AI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Support chatbots · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Helply would cost ~$1,000/month vs. Zendesk AI at ~$2,500+ with add-ons” Mistral Small · Support chatbots · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Zendesk’s AI Agent charges between $1.50 and $2.00 per resolution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Helpdesk · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zendesk AI, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zendesk AI was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Intercom49 of 5617Not in the top three
Ada34 of 561Not in the top three
Tidio18 of 566Not in the top three
Kore.ai17 of 563Not in the top three
Salesforce Agentforce15 of 560Not in the top three
Freshdesk14 of 560Not in the top three
Gorgias12 of 561Not in the top three
Sierra11 of 560Not in the top three
Botpress10 of 561Not in the top three
Rasa9 of 562Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zendesk AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 56 answers that named Zendesk AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zendesk.comYour site7
botpress.com5
capterra.com5
eesel.ai5
fin.ai5
lindy.ai5
thecxlead.com5
crescendo.ai4
sitegpt.ai4
teamsupport.com4

Forty-two of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming Zendesk AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Zendesk AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zendesk AI; a claim can dispute any of them.
Zendesk AI (formerly Answer Bot) 1Zendesk Advanced AI 1

The company

Zendesk is the company behind Zendesk AI.
Website
zendesk.com
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
2007
Employees
about 3,830 (2020)
Ownership
Public, zen on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zendesk AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zendesk AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zendesk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack