Every category where a model named EngageBay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM	Revenue operations	0%	17 of 71	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 41%
Marketing automation and campaign management	Marketing	0%	20 of 53	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 55%
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	58 of 159	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%
Customer success platforms	Customer	0%	44 of 69	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 39%
Lead routing and management	Sales	0%	40 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EngageBay yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EngageBay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	3
Mistral Small	2	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained20 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Free Plan for Teams ... Generous free user limits plus built-in email marketing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CRM · budget prompt · alternative

“HubSpot-like at SMB prices; Growth plan ~$42-65/user/mo unlocks full automation.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Marketing automation · budget prompt · alternative

“Comprehensive CRM covering marketing, sales, and customer support” Mistral Small · CRM · comparative prompt · alternative

“All-in-one (CRM + marketing), segmentation, nurturing.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lead routing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EngageBay, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EngageBay was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zoho CRM20 of 357Not in the top three

HubSpot CRM19 of 355Not in the top three

Pipedrive15 of 351Not in the top three

Freshsales15 of 350Not in the top three

Less Annoying CRM11 of 351Not in the top three

ActiveCampaign9 of 352Not in the top three

Salesflare7 of 353Not in the top three

Brevo7 of 352Not in the top three

Salesforce Sales Cloud7 of 351Not in the top three

Bitrix247 of 350Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EngageBay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 35 answers that named EngageBay and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

abacum.ai1

apollo.io1

avoma.com1

blog.hubspot.com1

business.com1

captivateiq.com1

clicksgeek.com1

cubesoftware.com1

ecosystem.hubspot.com1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming EngageBay came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

abacum.ai/blog/top-revenue-forecasting-software-platforms-for-accurate-projections1

apollo.io/insights/best-sales-enablement-tools1

avoma.com/blog/hubspot-vs-zoho1

blog.hubspot.com/sales/small-business-sales-tools1

business.com/articles/hubspot-vs-zoho1

captivateiq.com/blog/sales-enablement-platform1

clicksgeek.com/best-marketing-channels-for-small-business1

cubesoftware.com/blog/revenue-forecasting-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EngageBay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EngageBay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at engagebay.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.