GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Vitally · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Vitally

133Judge labels
19First choices
21Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
23% in Customer success for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 69 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 50 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In customer success · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Vitally for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Customer success platformsCustomer23%2 of 6912%50accepted challenger
Customer intelligence and data scienceGTM data and infrastructure2%17 of 1580%2under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vitally yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vitally across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510203
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash23016
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast14016
Mistral Small24006
DeepSeek V4 Flash31127
Llama 4 Maverick12003
Qwen 3.7 Flash12014
Kimi K214016
GLM 4.7 FlashX14005
MiniMax M2.512003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels9
Paraphrase17 labels4
Comparative29 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labelsNone
Scale-constrained19 labels6
Negative22 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative133 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Vitally for most mid-market companies - it offers the best balance of features, pricing, and modern UX” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer success · direct prompt · first choice
“Vitally is the strongest overall choice and the default pick most CS analysts point mid-market teams to first” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer success · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Go with Vitally if you want the best time-to-value and modern experience at a mid-market price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Vitally — If you want fast time-to-value, modern UX, and strong product analytics integration” Kimi K2 · Customer success · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid pricier options like ... Vitally/ChurnZero (custom, $1K+/month)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Customer success · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget ... generally not where you should start” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer success · budget prompt · hard negative
“Be Cautious If: You want quick, simple setups and do not have technical resources to manage filtering logic.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer success · negative prompt · soft negative
“cannot afford the $300\u2013$500+/month minimums of competitors like Vitally or ClientSuccess” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer success · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vitally, over the 133 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vitally was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gainsight106 of 13328Not in the top three
Totango93 of 1332Not in the top three
Planhat82 of 1331Not in the top three
ClientSuccess76 of 1334Not in the top three
HubSpot Service Hub46 of 1335Not in the top three
Catalyst27 of 1330Not in the top three
Akita17 of 1333Not in the top three
Skalin17 of 1333Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vitally. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 133 answers that named Vitally and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

usepylon.com12
userpilot.com12
gartner.com9
coworker.ai8
guideflow.com8
learn.g2.com7
oliv.ai7
appcues.com6
clientsuccess.com6
g2.com6

Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Vitally came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vitally's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vitally, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vitally.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.