| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 23% | 2 of 69 | 12% | 50 | accepted challenger |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 17 of 158 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with Vitally for most mid-market companies - it offers the best balance of features, pricing, and modern UX” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer success · direct prompt · first choice
“Vitally is the strongest overall choice and the default pick most CS analysts point mid-market teams to first” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer success · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Go with Vitally if you want the best time-to-value and modern experience at a mid-market price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Vitally — If you want fast time-to-value, modern UX, and strong product analytics integration” Kimi K2 · Customer success · scale prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid pricier options like ... Vitally/ChurnZero (custom, $1K+/month)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Customer success · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget ... generally not where you should start” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer success · budget prompt · hard negative
“Be Cautious If: You want quick, simple setups and do not have technical resources to manage filtering logic.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer success · negative prompt · soft negative
“cannot afford the $300\u2013$500+/month minimums of competitors like Vitally or ClientSuccess” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer success · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 133 answers that named Vitally and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Vitally came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vitally's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vitally, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vitally.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.