AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Customer › Customer success › Vitally vs HubSpot Service Hub
Customer success platforms · October 2026 Edition

Vitally vs HubSpot Service Hub

Three of fourteen models named Vitally first on the direct prompt; zero named HubSpot Service Hub. Vitally was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and HubSpot Service Hub by eleven and Vitally carries 57 labels and HubSpot Service Hub 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Vitally

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

HubSpot Service Hub

criticized challenger

By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in eight categories this edition.

First-choice share19%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%26%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels5727A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Vitally reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChurnZero was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. ChurnZero vs Vitally · ChurnZero vs HubSpot Service Hub · Vitally vs Custify

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer success platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
VitallyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHubSpot Service Hub
Direct301 against HubSpot Service Hub
Paraphrase30
Comparative103 against HubSpot Service Hub
Budget-constrained061 against Vitally
Scale-constrained50
Negative104 against Vitally · 3 against HubSpot Service Hub
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Vitally and HubSpot Service Hub were named in the same answer sixty times, of the 146 answers naming Vitally and the 255 naming HubSpot Service Hub. In those answers HubSpot Service Hub took the first choice nine times and Vitally ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Vitally and HubSpot Service Hub stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Vitally HubSpot Service Hub first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Vitally on the left and HubSpot Service Hub on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Vitally and HubSpot Service Hub stood in it.

Vitally first, HubSpot Service Hub an alternative

3 of 14 modelsHubSpot Service Hub was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Vitally alternatives: ChurnZero, ClientSuccess
Qwen 3.7 FlashChurnZero, Vitally alternatives: Custify, HubSpot Service Hub, Skalin, Totango
GLM 4.7 FlashXChurnZero, Vitally alternatives: Totango

Neither was the first choice, one was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashChurnZero alternatives: Planhat, Totango, Vitally
Perplexity SonarChurnZero alternatives: Vitally
Grok 4.20ChurnZero alternatives: Custify, Vitally
Mistral SmallSkalin alternatives: ChurnZero, Custify, Gainsight Customer Success, Planhat, Vitally
DeepSeek V4 FlashSkalin alternatives: ChurnZero, ClientSuccess, Custify, Totango, Vitally
Llama 4 MaverickChurnZero alternatives: Skalin, Userpilot, Vitally
Kimi K2ChurnZero alternatives: Totango, Vitally
MiniMax M2.5ChurnZero, Skalin alternatives: Totango, Vitally
GPT-6 LunaChurnZero alternatives: Planhat, Vitally
Muse Glimmer 30BChurnZero alternatives: ClientSuccess, Custify, Planhat, Skalin, Totango, Vitally

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniChurnZero, Planhat alternatives: Gainsight Customer Success

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HubSpot Service Hub leads by nine points.
HubSpot Service Hub20%#2 of 9
Vitally11%#3 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Vitally leads at mid-market.
Vitally19%#2 of 10
HubSpot Service Hub10%#3 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Vitally leads by two points.
Vitally4%#3 of 9
HubSpot Service Hub2%#6 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Vitally

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Account-Based Pricing Models (Planhat, Vitally, ChurnZero)... costs can escalate quickly without corresponding value” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Opaque Enterprise Pricing: Mid-market teams routinely see quotes exceeding $100K/year” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Unlike Vitally (~$299+/mo, great for growth metrics but pricier)” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Top pick for mid-market and fast-growing teams: ChurnZero or Vitally, depending on whether you prioritize usage-based health scoring or modern UX.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“ChurnZero or Vitally, depending on whether you prioritize usage-based health scoring or modern UX.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Prioritize high-rated, user-loved options like Vitally, Custify, or Skalin” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice

What the models said about HubSpot Service Hub

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Avoid the "Let's Just Build It in Our CRM" Trap (Salesforce / HubSpot Customization)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Not a dedicated customer success platform — lacks the deep health scoring, churn prediction, and journey orchestration of the specialists.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“For the tightest budget, Totango's free tier or HubSpot Service Hub's free plan would be the best starting points.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best customer success platform is usually HubSpot Service Hub Starter if you want an all-in-one option” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.