GTM AI Index
Index Customer Customer success › HubSpot Service Hub vs Skalin
Customer success platforms · September 2026 Edition

HubSpot Service Hub vs Skalin

Zero of twelve models named HubSpot Service Hub first on the direct prompt; zero named Skalin. HubSpot Service Hub was named by ten of the twelve models and Skalin by seven and HubSpot Service Hub carries 15 labels and Skalin 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

HubSpot Service Hub

accepted challenger

By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in seven categories this edition.

Skalin

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share5%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate13%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels1514A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HubSpot Service Hub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChurnZero was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. ChurnZero vs HubSpot Service Hub · ChurnZero vs Skalin · Vitally vs HubSpot Service Hub

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer success platforms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HubSpot Service HubFirst choices, of twelve modelsSkalin
Direct001 against Skalin
Paraphrase002 against HubSpot Service Hub
Comparative00
Budget-constrained31
Scale-constrained01
Negative02
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HubSpot Service Hub and Skalin stood in it.
ModelDirectSKParaphraseSKComparativeSKBudget-constrainedSKScale-constrainedSKNegativeSK
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashSKSK
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 FastSKSK
Mistral SmallSK
DeepSeek V4 FlashSKSK
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashSK
Kimi K2SKSKSK
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
HubSpot Service HubSK Skalin first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HubSpot Service Hub on the left and Skalin on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HubSpot Service Hub and Skalin stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashChurnZero, ClientSuccess alternatives: Skalin

Neither was named

11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Vitally alternatives: ChurnZero, Custify, Totango
GPT-5.4 miniChurnZero alternatives: Gainsight, Totango
Gemini 3.5 FlashVitally alternatives: ChurnZero, Planhat, Totango
Perplexity SonarChurnZero alternatives: ClientSuccess, Gainsight, Planhat, Vitally
Grok 4.1 FastChurnZero alternatives: ClientSuccess, Custify, Gainsight, Planhat, Vitally
Mistral SmallChurnZero, Vitally alternatives: ClientSuccess, Custify, Gainsight, Planhat
DeepSeek V4 FlashVitally alternatives: Catalyst, ChurnZero, Planhat
Llama 4 MaverickChurnZero alternatives: ClientSuccess, Planhat, Vitally
Kimi K2ChurnZero alternatives: ClientSuccess, Custify, Planhat, Vitally
GLM 4.7 FlashXVitally alternatives: ChurnZero, Custify, Planhat
MiniMax M2.5ChurnZero, Vitally alternatives: ClientSuccess, Planhat

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HubSpot Service Hub leads by eleven points.
HubSpot Service Hub11%#2 of 9
Skalin0%#– of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
HubSpot Service Hub leads by two points.
HubSpot Service Hub5%#4 of 10
Skalin4%#6 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Skalin leads at enterprise.
Skalin5%#– of 7
HubSpot Service Hub2%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about HubSpot Service Hub

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“HubSpot Service Hub - Too lightweight for dedicated health scoring needs” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“HubSpot offers a highly robust free CRM that includes basic ticketing, customer portals, email tracking, and contact management.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“HubSpot Service Hub (Free tier) is the best customer success platform for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Custify or HubSpot Service Hub are top picks for budget-conscious teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Skalin

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Skalin claims #1 on Capterra/G2 (4.92/5), but lower visibility/scale vs. leaders.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · soft negative
“Custify and Skalin offer the best balance of dedicated customer success features and affordability” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Vitally, ChurnZero, Catalyst, Custify, Skalin | Highly Recommended.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“| Skalin | 4.90/5 | Top-rated for 5 years straight |” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.