| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 7% | 5 of 49 | 22% | 55 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 93 of 104 | 43% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% | |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 47 of 142 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer success | 4% | 8% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 of 49, unchanged |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 93 of 104, unchanged |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 87 → 47 of 142 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For the tightest budget, Totango's free tier or HubSpot Service Hub's free plan would be the best starting points.” MiniMax M2.5 · Customer success · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Totango offers the best balance of functionality, ease of implementation, and cost.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Customer success · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Totango (now Totango + Catalyst)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer success · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall on a limited budget: Totango” GPT-5.4 mini · Customer success · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to watch out for: Gainsight, Totango... a primary source of frustration for startups and mid-market teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative
“But I would specifically steer clear of: Totango right now (post-merger uncertainty is a real business risk)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer success · negative prompt · hard negative
“Support quality has declined post-merger, with slow response times and bugs that take weeks to resolve” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Customer success · negative prompt · hard negative
“Weak Reporting... UX Breaks at Scale... Brand Consolidation Uncertainty” Kimi K2 · Customer success · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 158 of the 171 answers that named Totango and are not a share of its labels.
501 of the 501 domain citations in answers naming Totango came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 612 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| News or press | 238 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 103 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 64 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Case study | 8 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2025-01-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-01-01 |
Every page totango.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Totango's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: totango.com, trust.totango.com, totango.com/blog-categories/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Totango's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Totango, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Totango by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: