| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 6% | 7 of 142 | 25% | 12 | criticized challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 103 of 104 | 83% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% | |
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 51 of 84 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Loyalty, advocacy and referrals | Marketing | 0% | 52 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| RFP response software | Sales | 0% | 68 of 82 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25% | |
| Sales gamification | Sales | 0% | 56 of 64 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intel | 2% | 5% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 7 of 142 |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 103 of 104, unchanged |
| Feedback | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 51 of 84 |
| Loyalty | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 110, unchanged |
| RFP response | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 68 of 82, unchanged |
| Sales gamification | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 56 of 64, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The most frequently cited all-around options for mid-market B2B are HubSpot's customer platform ... and Gainsight for customer-success / revenue intelligence.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Customer intel · direct prompt · first choice
“If your primary goal is managing existing relationships, reducing churn, and upselling, Gainsight is the industry standard for B2B companies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Factors.ai or Gainsight paired with your existing CRM is a strong starting point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Customer intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Best if customer success and retention are the goal more than classic loyalty/referrals: Gainsight” Perplexity Sonar · Loyalty · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Gainsight is notoriously difficult and time-consuming to configure... Who should avoid them: Teams without dedicated IT/Ops support” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative
“you cannot afford the 6-month implementation times, heavy coding requirements, or dedicated operations teams required by enterprise-level beasts like Gainsight or Adobe Real-Time CDP” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer intel · direct prompt · soft negative
“These are fantastic for massive organizations but are often considered "overkill" for small-to-mid-size businesses. They can be expensive, difficult to configure” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales gamification · negative prompt · soft negative
“Worth evaluating if you need a broader customer-retention platform and have the resources to implement and manage it.” GPT-6 Luna · Customer intel · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 61 of the 71 answers that named Gainsight and are not a share of its labels.
170 of the 170 domain citations in answers naming Gainsight came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,394 | 5 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1,146 | 16 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| News or press | 377 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 343 | 12 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 266 | 0 | 2026-04-13 | ||
| Case study | 92 | 8 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 49 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | ||
| Comparison | 42 | 4 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 17 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-23 |
Every page gainsight.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Gainsight's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gainsight.com, gainsight.com/pricing, trust.gainsight.com, gainsight.com/platform, gainsight.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gainsight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gainsight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gainsight by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: