| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 2% | 7 of 69 | 14% | 35 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with ChurnZero or ClientSuccess demos—they're the most commonly recommended for your segment” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer success · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want a simple, clean workspace and need to be up and running by next month: Go with ClientSuccess or Custify.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer success · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Custify or ClientSuccess if: ... startup needing affordable, flexible solutions” Kimi K2 · Customer success · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose ClientSuccess if you want a lighter, simpler mid-market CS platform” Perplexity Sonar · Customer success · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“ClientSuccess has received several concerning reviews highlighting: Limited customization... Poor customer service” MiniMax M2.5 · Customer success · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget ... generally not where you should start” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer success · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Gainsight, ClientSuccess, Salesforce Service Cloud” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer success · negative prompt · hard negative
“cannot afford the $300\u2013$500+/month minimums of competitors like Vitally or ClientSuccess” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer success · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 95 answers that named ClientSuccess and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming ClientSuccess came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClientSuccess's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClientSuccess, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clientsuccess.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.